I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
I am getting really annoyed. What are you guys using?
Thanks,
Jake Johnson
http://www.plutoid.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm using Mozilla for X and lynx for console
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Jake Johnson wrote:
> I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
> weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
> I am getting
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 00:26, Jake Johnson wrote:
> I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
> weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
> I am getting really annoyed. What are you guys using?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jake Johnson
> http://www.
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 00:26, Jake Johnson wrote:
> I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
> weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
> I am getting really annoyed. What are you guys using?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jake Johnson
> http://www.
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 01:07, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 00:26, Jake Johnson wrote:
> > I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
> > weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
> > I am getting really annoyed. What are you g
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 01:10, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> I'm finding Epiphany impressive if you are using GTK2 oriented
> applications, if you have Mozilla already on the system for the Gecko
> portion. Otherwise, Mozilla Firebird has Gecko (or its own version
> thereof) bundled in. If you are KDE-orien
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 13:15, Mark Roach wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 01:10, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> > I'm finding Epiphany impressive if you are using GTK2 oriented
> > applications, if you have Mozilla already on the system for the Gecko
> > portion. Otherwise, Mozilla Firebird has Gecko (or its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:26:10PM -0700, Jake Johnson wrote:
> I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
> weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
> I am getting really annoyed. What are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:28:04AM -0400, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> The next step heavier would be VMWare with Windows XP and MSIE ;)
Actually, the next step heavier would be winex3 with MSIE, and after
that, winex3 running the Windows version of Netscap
on Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:26:10PM -0700, Jake Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
> weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
> I am getting really annoyed. What are you guys using?
Galeon on
On Monday 16 June 2003 17:49, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
> > weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
> > I am getting really annoyed. What are you guys using?
>
> Galeon on reasonable HW. Dill
Frank Van Damme wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2003 17:49, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
I am getting really annoyed. What are you guys using?
Galeon on re
on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 05:57:22PM +0200, Frank Van Damme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2003 17:49, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > I don't want to get into any long debate, but I am looking for a light
> > > weight browser. I am currently using Opera, but crashes occasionally and
>
On Monday 16 June 2003 21:39, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I don't believe the PII was shipped less than 200MHz, so what I'm saying
> is: pre-PII HW, you're going to want a lighter-weight option.
Opera then.
--
Frank Van Dammehttp://www.openstandaarden.be
~~~~~~
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:55:05PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2003 21:39, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > I don't believe the PII was shipped less than 200MHz, so what I'm saying
> > is: pre-PII HW, you're going to want a lighter-weight option.
>
> Opera then.
i wouldnt say oper
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 20:57, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:55:05PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> > On Monday 16 June 2003 21:39, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > I don't believe the PII was shipped less than 200MHz, so what I'm saying
> > > is: pre-PII HW, you're going to want a
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 04:38, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> IIRC, the OP was asking this question BECAUSE Opera was too resource
> demanding.
Er no, because it was too unstable :-)
(I don't have problems with opera's stability... if only it used fontconfig...
)
to the OP: maybe it's your qt libraries
17 matches
Mail list logo
