On Sunday 28 April 2013 13:57:02 Richard Owlett wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 23 apr 13, 10:06:18, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> Dan Ritter wrote:
> >>> By the way, you have an unusually brusque way of stating
> >>> conditions rather than asking questions, which comes across as
> >>> sligh
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 23 apr 13, 10:06:18, Richard Owlett wrote:
Dan Ritter wrote:
By the way, you have an unusually brusque way of stating
conditions rather than asking questions, which comes across as
slightly rude.
Apologies, I've just been chastised by relatives and friends for
go
On Ma, 23 apr 13, 10:06:18, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> >By the way, you have an unusually brusque way of stating
> >conditions rather than asking questions, which comes across as
> >slightly rude.
>
> Apologies, I've just been chastised by relatives and friends for
> going in
Jhon Edison Castañeda Lozano wrote:
Hi!,
Read this documents
http://www.pello.info/filez/firewall/iptables.html or this
http://www.pello.info/filez/IPTABLES_en_21_segundos.html
Explained this quite practical examples.
The problem is that this in Spanish, but nothing that google
translator can
Hi!,
Read this documents http://www.pello.info/filez/firewall/iptables.html or
this http://www.pello.info/filez/IPTABLES_en_21_segundos.html
Explained this quite practical examples.
The problem is that this in Spanish, but nothing that google translator can
not fix.
Greetings.
Jhon Castañeda.
Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:10:03 +0200
Lisi Reisz wrote:
That seems to be his whole approach.
Holistic maybe ☺
Yes, with a additional complication of keeping in mind
requirements of different sets of machines.
Requirements of Set A conflict with requirements of Set C
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:10:03 +0200
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> That seems to be his whole approach.
Holistic maybe ☺
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/
On Thursday 25 April 2013 17:39:14 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I think I'm happier for having looked for shoals first.
Looking for shoals is one thing. But you are creating them.
And I always read manuals first. It isn't that unusual. ;-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lis
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 11:40:17 Richard Owlett wrote:
One thing perhaps wasn't clear. I was referring to my
Windows experience
Sorry, Richard. :-( I didn't take in that you had actually _said_ that.
You simply can't use your Windows experience to predict the problems t
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 11:40:17 Richard Owlett wrote:
> One thing perhaps wasn't clear. I was referring to my
> Windows experience
Sorry, Richard. :-( I didn't take in that you had actually _said_ that.
You simply can't use your Windows experience to predict the problems that you
will have
On Thursday 25 April 2013 16:48:53 Charles Kroeger wrote:
> > I have never noticed my free version of 9 updating itself. :-/
>
> That's good, it won't. If you occasionally try:
Thanks for the reply, Charles!
I am quite happy with things as they are, for now. The OP was worried about
his copy of
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:40:01 +0200
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I have never noticed my free version of 9 updating itself. :-/
That's good, it won't. If you occasionally try:
#apt-get autoremove
you will probably see it is trying to rid itself of 'acroread' files. If you
want
to upgrade Adobe reader y
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 12:13:07 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I've the free version of 9.00. Listed option to disable
> updating not available.
The Linux version of 9 (I have 9.5.4) has nothing at all of any kind about
updating. So far as I can see it is not an option. Are you sure that you
are
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 12:13:07 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I've the free version of 9.00. Listed option to disable
> updating not available.
I have never noticed my free version of 9 updating itself. :-/
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Jochen Spieker wrote:
Richard Owlett:
Adobe Reader wants to update itself and I haven't found a way to
disable it. If view pdf with it when I also happen be connected it
just barges in and consumes my bandwidth.
http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/disable-automatic-updates-acrobat-reader.html
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
A little bit OT:
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 04:49 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Adobe Reader
Why not using document viewer, aka Evince or something else? I'm not
against proprietary software, drivers etc., but I'm using Linux for good
reasons and I don't know why I should instal
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
downloading.
Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
I want all programs to access the internet after explicitly asking
for permission.
Richard Owlett:
>
> Adobe Reader wants to update itself and I haven't found a way to
> disable it. If view pdf with it when I also happen be connected it
> just barges in and consumes my bandwidth.
http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/disable-automatic-updates-acrobat-reader.html
:)
But I understa
A little bit OT:
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 04:49 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Adobe Reader
Why not using document viewer, aka Evince or something else? I'm not
against proprietary software, drivers etc., but I'm using Linux for good
reasons and I don't know why I should install any software from Ad
Jochen Spieker wrote:
[snip]
But I still don't completely understand your situation. You said you are
on dialup and want to prevent unnecessary traffic. Can't you just
disable auto-dialling? Which specific programs use the network without
your consent?
Auto dialing has been disabled for years
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:02 +0200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> When I had shorewall running the console was flooded with messages about
> access attempts.
I like shorewall, lots of separate configurable files, or if you're lazy just
run
it configured by way of example files that come with it. Sho
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
> downloading.
> Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
> I want all programs to access the internet after explicitly asking
> for permission.
> The response t
Richard Owlett:
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>
>> Also, I had to do a double take to work out which bit was a question, rather
>> than a statement. I think that he is asking us to recommend some reading
>> matter.
>>
>
> I intended the subject line to convey request for reading material.
Hrmmh, it app
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 17:32:34 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I couldn't ask a specific question as I don't know anything
> about it in the Linux world.
The problem is, if you don't ask a specific question, we cannot give a
specific answer. The result of what you did "ask" is that you have had quite
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 15:43:23 Dan Ritter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
downloading.
Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
I want all programs to access the i
On 04/23/2013 11:06 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Dan Ritter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
downloading.
Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
I want all programs to access the interne
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
> downloading.
> Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
> I want all programs to access the internet after explicitly asking
> for permission.
> The response t
Richard Owlett:
>
> Apologies, I've just been chastised by relatives and friends for
> going in the other direction.
Never mind.
> I was trying to make clear I want only minimal connectivity.
> As to the per program feature, I want to prevent an app from
> deciding to update on its schedule not
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 16:06:18 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I want to prevent an app from
> deciding to update on its schedule not mine.
I don't have any applications set to update automatically. That is the simple
solution to that problem!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 15:43:23 Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
> > downloading.
> > Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
> > I want all programs to access the inter
Richard Owlett:
>
> I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
> downloading.
> Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
> I want all programs to access the internet after explicitly asking
> for permission.
> The response to the request may be:
>No
>Always YES
Dan Ritter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
downloading.
Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
I want all programs to access the internet after explicitly asking
for permission.
The r
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
> downloading.
> Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
> I want all programs to access the internet after explicitly asking
> for permission.
> The response t
I will be using email, Usenet, browser and occasionally file
downloading.
Nothing on my system should look/act like a server.
I want all programs to access the internet after explicitly
asking for permission.
The response to the request may be:
No
Always YES
Ask each occurrence
--
34 matches
Mail list logo
