On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:52:12 -0700
David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>
> > As long as I use iptables I was not able to use policies of reject. I
> > even remember the target 'REJECT' being a selectable kernel option.
> > Rej
David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>
>> As long as I use iptables I was not able to use policies of reject. I
>> even remember the target 'REJECT' being a selectable kernel option.
>> Reject requires some ICMP action whereas DROP doesn't.
>
> Bu
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
As long as I use iptables I was not able to use policies of reject. I
even remember the target 'REJECT' being a selectable kernel option.
Reject requires some ICMP action whereas DROP doesn't.
But be aware that DROP can cause unexpec
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:11:12AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> As long as I use iptables I was not able to use policies of reject. I
> even remember the target 'REJECT' being a selectable kernel option.
> Reject requires some ICMP action whereas DROP doesn't.
I can understand the reaso
As long as I use iptables I was not able to use policies of reject. I
even remember the target 'REJECT' being a selectable kernel option.
Reject requires some ICMP action whereas DROP doesn't.
> I am just going through my firewall setup and I notice I can no longer
> do iptables -P INPUT R
On 09/10/2007 04:55 PM, Alex Samad wrote:
Hi
I am just going through my firewall setup and I notice I can no longer
do iptables -P INPUT REJECT
On 9/10/07, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am just going through my firewall setup and I notice I can no longer
> do iptables -P INPUT REJECT
iptables -P INPUT DROP
I use DROP. I guess it is not a good idea to send ICMP packets back
by default (But I don't know if it can be don
Hi
I am just going through
8 matches
Mail list logo
