On 25 Jun 1998 10:24:02 +0200, Brederlow wrote: >I compiled a lot of packages on my system and often I see that >programms don't use cc as their compiler. Thus they don't use >/etc/alternatives/cc.
>Unless somebody tells me a good reason for not using cc I will open >bugs against any Packages that just uses gcc for fun. I know that some >Packages need gcc explicitly, but that should be a realy small number. Uhm, aside from the fact that gcc is now the de facto standard and cc is considered an aniquated POS? -- Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions! ---------------------------------------+------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]