Re: It Must be the Matrox G400

2000-09-10 Thread Paul T. McNally
on 9/10/00 4:03 PM, Philipp Schulte at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One possible solution is to find somebody with the same mouse and ask > him hor his config. You could just copy the "pointer" section. I could reinstall Redhat and look at it's config looks.. and then, well that would be ti

Re: It Must be the Matrox G400

2000-09-10 Thread Philipp Schulte
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:13:44PM -0500, William Jensen wrote: > I've seen this type of mouse behavior before when gdm(?) is being run. If > you check the archives just a couple weeks ago you will see a fair amount > of usefull fixes for this situation. It's called "gpm". It sucks ;) Phil

Re: It Must be the Matrox G400

2000-09-10 Thread Philipp Schulte
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:12:08PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote: > I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was > all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to > com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the > screen. When that happene

Re: It Must be the Matrox G400

2000-09-10 Thread William Jensen
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:12:08PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote: > I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was > all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to > com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the > screen. When that happened,

It Must be the Matrox G400

2000-09-10 Thread Paul T. McNally
I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the screen. When that happened, I ran XF86Setup and changed a couple settings on the mouse and I think t