Re: KDE : why not in Debian?

1999-07-07 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 16:46:45 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Probably because Debian doesn't want to force KDE on people who like GNOME. Definitely not. The whole of the X environment (with the exception of xlib6g), is optional, let alone any particular applications or desktop environments

Re: KDE : why not in Debian?

1999-07-06 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 6 Jul, Attila Csosz wrote about "KDE : why not in Debian?" > Why not the KDE in the Debian distribution? It distributed with its source > code and licensed with GPL( as I read in the KDE FAQ ) > > Attila > > Read http://www.debian.org/News/1998/19981008. W

Re: KDE : why not in Debian?

1999-07-06 Thread Morgoth3
Probably because Debian doesn't want to force KDE on people who like GNOME. Is there a page that discusses the merits of each system? I've only used GNOME so far, and I've found it to be rather slow. Colin Winters

Re: KDE : why not in Debian?

1999-07-06 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 20:58:37 +0200, Attila Csosz wrote: > Why not the KDE in the Debian distribution? It distributed with its source > code and licensed with GPL( as I read in the KDE FAQ ) See http://www.debian.org/News/1998/19981008 . Basically, KDE's license (the GPL) interacts with the lic

KDE : why not in Debian?

1999-07-06 Thread Attila Csosz
Why not the KDE in the Debian distribution? It distributed with its source code and licensed with GPL( as I read in the KDE FAQ ) Attila -- --- - Debian 2.1 Linux / 2.2.9 / qmail - - Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-