Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
You're much better off simply changing sources.list right
before your next distribution upgrade. This is what Debian recommends,
oddly enough
Oddly ?
The recommended upgrade path described in the Release notes is usually
more complex than just running apt-get update
On 02/06/11 01:07, R. Clayton wrote:
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
non-commented
appearances of squeeze with stable in sources.list; do I need to do
anything else? Is this the
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:07:40AM +0100, R. Clayton wrote:
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
non-commented
appearances of squeeze with stable in sources.list; do I need to do
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:07:40 -0400, R. Clayton wrote:
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the
stable release independent of what the release is called.
That seems a contradictory selection of words :-)
Stable is _now_ squeeze but it will be wheezy as soon as
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
You're much better off simply changing sources.list right
before your next distribution upgrade. This is what Debian recommends,
oddly enough
Oddly ?
It's another of the strange idioms of the
On 06/02/11 at 02:08pm, Tom Furie wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
You're much better off simply changing sources.list right
before your next distribution upgrade. This is what Debian recommends,
oddly enough
On Jun 2, 2011 2:19 PM, William Hopkins we.hopk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/02/11 at 02:08pm, Tom Furie wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
You're much better off simply changing sources.list right
before your next
On 06/01/2011 04:07 PM, R. Clayton wrote:
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
release independent of what the release is called. I changed all non-commented
appearances of squeeze with stable in sources.list; do I need to do
anything else? Is this the
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:39:15AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 6/1/2011 6:07 PM, R. Clayton wrote:
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the
stable
release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
non-commented
appearances of squeeze
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
release independent of what the release is called. I changed all non-commented
appearances of squeeze with stable in sources.list; do I need to do
anything else? Is this the right approach to take for a perpetually
Yes that's all.
On Jun 1, 2011 7:15 PM, R. Clayton rvclay...@verizon.net wrote:
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the
stable
release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
non-commented
appearances of squeeze with stable in sources.list; do I
R. Clayton writes:
Is this the right approach to take for a perpetually stable system?
Probably not (though I don't know exactly what you are trying to
achieve). When the next release occurs the stable link will be
abruptly changed to point to Wheezy (which is now testing). Squeeze
will then
On 6/1/2011 6:07 PM, R. Clayton wrote:
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
non-commented
appearances of squeeze with stable in sources.list; do I need to do
anything else? Is this
13 matches
Mail list logo
