On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:07:26 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/05/07 17:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:06:07 -0600
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> You need linux-image-2.6.18-4-686.
>
On Mon February 5 2007 15:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:06:07 -0600
>
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You need linux-image-2.6.18-4-686.
>
> ^^^
> Are you sure? I just updated and I still only see the -3- image.
Etch is still at -3. If
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:07:26PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/05/07 17:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:06:07 -0600
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> You need linux-image-2.6.18-4-686.
> > ^^^
> > Are you sure? I just update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/07 17:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:06:07 -0600
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You need linux-image-2.6.18-4-686.
> ^^^
> Are you sure? I just updated and I still only see the -
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:06:07 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need linux-image-2.6.18-4-686.
^^^
Are you sure? I just updated and I still only see the -3- image.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
On 2007-02-05, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:32:01 GMT
> Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've upgraded my RAM from 512M to 1.5G, ... Google tells me that I
>> need a kernel with highmem support. ... which one?
>>
>> Linux blackbart 2.6.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/07 11:32, Tyler Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've upgraded my RAM from 512M to 1.5G, (the original 512 plus a new
> 1GB chip). I've installed it correctly, as verified by the BIOS and
> WinXP on the same machine. Debian testing only sees 906792kb v
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:32:01 GMT
Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've upgraded my RAM from 512M to 1.5G, (the original 512 plus a new
> 1GB chip). I've installed it correctly, as verified by the BIOS and
> WinXP on the same machine. Debian testing only sees 906792kb vs
> 1563056k
Hi,
I've upgraded my RAM from 512M to 1.5G, (the original 512 plus a new
1GB chip). I've installed it correctly, as verified by the BIOS and
WinXP on the same machine. Debian testing only sees 906792kb vs
1563056kb in WinXP. Google tells me that I need a kernel with highmem
support. I can't sort o
thanks
perhaps i got a older version.
but i hope the debian developer's group include kernel source code at
new version
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 05:28:07PM +0200, Romain Marciel wrote:
> monky wrote:
> >hello,everybody
> >i download debian sarge Disk 1 from internet and install it.
> >everything is
monky wrote:
hello,everybody
i download debian sarge Disk 1 from internet and install it.
everything is successful.but i download other software in my computer.
when i compile there softwares,the system promt me "your must have
kernel header file".
i run 'uname -r' at my computer,i get some message
hello,everybody
i download debian sarge Disk 1 from internet and install it.
everything is successful.but i download other software in my computer.
when i compile there softwares,the system promt me "your must have
kernel header file".
i run 'uname -r' at my computer,i get some message "2.6.8-1-686
"Mark D. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can I tell which Linux kernel is running on my Debian machine?
> Thanks.
uname -a
pgphsKWjYxG0T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server.postinst: /etc/init.d/mysql: No such file
or directory
update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/mysql: file does not exist
dpkg: error processing mysql-server (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
Hello
Mark D. Hansen (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> How can I tell which Linux kernel is running on my Debian machine?
Use uname.
best regards
Andreas Janssen
--
Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 ICQ #17079270
Registered Linux User #267976
http://www.andreas
Justin -
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:13:22PM +0100, Justin Cassidy wrote:
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server.postinst: /etc/init.d/mysql: No such file
> or directory
(as root):
touch /etc/init.d/mysql && chmod 755 /etc/init.d/mysql
*then* re-run the apt-get command I gave you in my last e-mail.
> How can I tell which Linux kernel is running on my Debian machine? Thanks.
type 'uname -a'
Cheers,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:32:25PM -0400, Mark D. Hansen wrote:
> How can I tell which Linux kernel is running on my Debian machine? Thanks.
uname -r
-- Thomas Adam
--
"Frankly, Mr. Shankly, since you ask. You are a flatulent pain in
the arse." -- Morrissey.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
How can I tell which Linux kernel is running on my Debian machine? Thanks.
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> What is the correct procedure to 2.6 kernel and utilities?
apt-get install kernel-image
This will show a list of all available kernel images. Pick a 2.6 kernel
image for your processor and install it.
If you are on Sarge or Sid, 2.6 kernels will be in the repository. If y
What is the correct procedure to 2.6 kernel and utilities?
-ihswar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Aube wrote:
> On Friday 06 February 2004 04:23 am, David Baron wrote:
> > The new kernel image would not boot up because of "missing" modules.dep
> > references. Does one need to build the whole thing or is there a way to
> > simply use the newer kernel with the modules that are already on the
On Friday 06 February 2004 04:23 am, David Baron wrote:
> The new kernel image would not boot up because of "missing" modules.dep
> references. Does one need to build the whole thing or is there a way to
> simply use the newer kernel with the modules that are already on the
> system?
Try running "
On Friday 06 February 2004 08:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> You can boot to a console and use "apt-get install kernel-image" to see a
> list of available kernel images (with versions). Pick a newer kernel from
> the list and install that.
I tried that. The new kernel image would not boot up beca
On Thursday 05 February 2004 05:44 pm, Matt Richardson wrote:
> Sorry to ask such a silly question, but I haven't found a good answer
> for it on google. I've got a Dell GX115 box running a basic Debian
> system from the 3.0r2 installation cds, with kernel 2.2. I tried the
> bf24 install, but it
On Thursday February 5 at 02:44pm
Matt Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to ask such a silly question, but I haven't found a good answer
> for it on google. I've got a Dell GX115 box running a basic Debian
> system from the 3.0r2 installation cds, with kernel 2.2. I tried the
> bf24
Hi all,
Sorry to ask such a silly question, but I haven't found a good answer
for it on google. I've got a Dell GX115 box running a basic Debian
system from the 3.0r2 installation cds, with kernel 2.2. I tried the
bf24 install, but it failed with a bad eic value, which after some
searching seems
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Charles Parker wrote:
> I don't see a 2.4 kernel in the stable Debian packages. I've been told it's
> usually NOT a good idea to take a kernel directly from kernel.org because it
> won't contain the customizations provided by your distribution, and things
> will likely break. I
"Charles" == Charles Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> I don't see a 2.4 kernel in the stable Debian
Charles> packages. I've been told it's usually NOT a good idea to
Charles> take a kernel directly from kernel.org because it won't
Charles> contain the customizations
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 20:49, Scott Henson wrote:
> You need to dist-upgrade to woody if you want a 2.4.x kernel.
Wrong. See other post in thread
Also
> cooking your own kernel from kernel.org sources work just fine. There
> shouldn't be anything wrong with it.
You need new modutils and pos
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 19:52, Charles Parker wrote:
> I don't see a 2.4 kernel in the stable Debian packages.
http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html
--
I did not vote for the Austrian government
begin Charles Parker quotation:
> I don't see a 2.4 kernel in the stable Debian packages. I've been told it's
> usually NOT a good idea to take a kernel directly from kernel.org because
> it won't contain the customizations provided by your distribution, and
> things will likely break.
Not t
begin Rich Puhek quotation:
> I don't believe Debian "customizes" the kernel at all. There are
> pre-compiled versions available with different options set (see things
> like "kernel-image-2.2.19-compact" and "kernel-image-2.2.19-ide"
There are also usually some extra patches applied, which I p
* Charles Parker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
... I've been told it's
> usually NOT a good idea to take a kernel directly from kernel.org because
> it won't contain the customizations provided by your distribution, and
> things will likely break.
This is usually the case with DeadRat, but
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 13:52, Charles Parker wrote:
> I don't see a 2.4 kernel in the stable Debian packages. I've been told it's
> usually NOT a good idea to take a kernel directly from kernel.org because it
> won't contain the customizations provided by your distribution, and things
> will like
Charles Parker wrote:
>
> I don't see a 2.4 kernel in the stable Debian packages. I've been told it's
> usually NOT a good idea to take a kernel directly from kernel.org because it
> won't contain the customizations provided by your distribution, and things
> will likely break. I've also been told
I don't see a 2.4 kernel in the stable Debian packages. I've been told it's
usually NOT a good idea to take a kernel directly from kernel.org because it
won't contain the customizations provided by your distribution, and things
will likely break. I've also been told to use a 2.4 kernel for bette
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 23:34, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have just done dist-upgrade from Potato to Woody. I have been using/learning
> Debian for a few months. This was the first serious change from my initial
> installation. The upgrade went smoothly, but took a while at 56k. I found many
> nice imp
- Jordan
- Original Message -
From: "Paul E Condon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: woody kernel question
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:56:29PM -0800, Geoff Ludwiczak wrote:
> > I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past
Go to http://www.kernel.org and you should see the 2.4.18-pre9 patch.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:18:55PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:56:29PM -0800, Geoff Ludwiczak wrote:
> > I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past couple days and see no
> > problems with it
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:56:29PM -0800, Geoff Ludwiczak wrote:
> I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past couple days and see no
> problems with it so far. I was using 2.4.17 before, and had no troubles with
> it either. Try 2.4.17, but if you're going to use 2.2, then just use 2.2.20.
I have used 2.4.17 without problems. If 2.2.18 is what comes with woody
now, then I guess it looks like favourite for the woody release.
Tom
Geoff Ludwiczak wrote:
>
> I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past couple days and see no
> problems with it so far. I was using 2.4.17 before,
I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past couple days and see no
problems with it so far. I was using 2.4.17 before, and had no troubles with
it either. Try 2.4.17, but if you're going to use 2.2, then just use 2.2.20.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:34:00PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I ha
I have just done dist-upgrade from Potato to Woody. I have been using/learning
Debian for a few months. This was the first serious change from my initial
installation. The upgrade went smoothly, but took a while at 56k. I found many
nice improvements, but saw that the kernel had not been upgraded.
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 16:40:56 -0500
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:23:06AM +0800, csj wrote:
> | On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:28:28 -0500
> | "Eric C. Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> | > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:07:18AM +0800, csj wrote:
> | > > In what file is t
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:23:06AM +0800, csj wrote:
| On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:28:28 -0500
| "Eric C. Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:07:18AM +0800, csj wrote:
| > > In what file is the definitive documentation for ALL possible kernel
| > > boot parameters locate
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:28:28 -0500
"Eric C. Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:07:18AM +0800, csj wrote:
> > In what file is the definitive documentation for ALL possible kernel
> > boot parameters located? Things like "hdc=ide-scsi" or "apm=on" which
> > you stick in
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:07:18AM +0800, csj wrote:
> In what file is the definitive documentation for ALL possible kernel
> boot parameters located? Things like "hdc=ide-scsi" or "apm=on" which
> you stick in your favorite bootloader.
If you have a kernel source tree in /usr/src/linux, it's in
/
In what file is the definitive documentation for ALL possible kernel
boot parameters located? Things like "hdc=ide-scsi" or "apm=on" which
you stick in your favorite bootloader.
--
Humanity's future is in the stars:
support a manned mission to Mars!
http://www.thinkmars.net/petition/addpetition.h
"JACKSON, DEAN" wrote:
>
> Help my hard drive has sustained very large physical damage. it boots sort
> of. as I use a multi processor system I would like to keep my kernel (it was
> a pain to configure)
> what is the best way of backing up my kernel? and restoring it!
>
> Dean Jackson
> TeleWare
ssage-
From: JACKSON, DEAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 27 maart 2001 16:33
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: kernel question
Help my hard drive has sustained very large physical damage. it boots sort
of. as I use a multi processor system I would like to keep my ke
Help my hard drive has sustained very large physical damage. it boots sort
of. as I use a multi processor system I would like to keep my kernel (it was
a pain to configure)
what is the best way of backing up my kernel? and restoring it!
Dean Jackson
TeleWare
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telephone 019
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 04:02:45PM +0100, c-3 wrote:
>
> And is there a way to compile a non compressed kernel image?
whenever you build a kernel (using any target zImage bzImage or
vmlinux) you will always have a uncompressed ELF kernel in the top
level kernel source directory at the end of the
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, c-3 wrote:
> Date sent:Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:57:59 -0500
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Erik van Roode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: general kernel question
> Forwarded by
Date sent: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:57:59 -0500
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
From: Erik van Roode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: general kernel question
Forwarded by: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> At 10:32 P
At 10:32 PM 2/16/01 +0100, c-3 wrote:
I just wondered why the kernel is always compressed. Couldn't you
save boot time, if it's not???
Depends on the speed of the medium from which you read the kernel,
and the speed of the processor.
If the processor can decompress faster than the medium ca
Hi!
I just wondered why the kernel is always compressed. Couldn't you
save boot time, if it's not???
Christian
Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 03:07:14PM +, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> > I am glad to see I am not the only oldie on the list :)
> > Bring back paper tape and drum storage I say...
>
> You had paper tape? You lucky bastard, we had to toggle switches:)
This is turning into a M
Decwriters (hard copy terminal behaviour)
Jeez you must be bored.
Cliff
On Tuesday 09 January 2001 22:31, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've been using linux for years and years, but I have never figured
> this odd little corner out. Perhaps someone here will know.
>
> If you type when the kernel is bootin
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 03:07:14PM +, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> I am glad to see I am not the only oldie on the list :)
> Bring back paper tape and drum storage I say...
You had paper tape? You lucky bastard, we had to toggle switches:)
--
groetjes, carel
> On Wed 10 Jan 01, 3:07 PM, Cliff Sarginson said...
> > I am glad to see I am not the only oldie on the list :)
> > Bring back paper tape and drum storage I say...
>
> in which case you should join the united states air force. computer
> operators are still being trained on papertape / card d
On Wed 10 Jan 01, 3:07 PM, Cliff Sarginson said...
> I am glad to see I am not the only oldie on the list :)
> Bring back paper tape and drum storage I say...
in which case you should join the united states air force. computer
operators are still being trained on papertape / card drives and dru
I am glad to see I am not the only oldie on the list :)
Bring back paper tape and drum storage I say...
Cliff
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Carel Fellinger wrote:
> > > it's because on a teletype you couldn't erase, so backspacing wouldn't
> > > help in keeping things readea
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Carel Fellinger wrote:
> > it's because on a teletype you couldn't erase, so backspacing wouldn't
> > help in keeping things readeable:)
>
> Hm, ok, that makes sense. I was thinking in the context of dumb
> terminals; teletypes were slightly before my ti
Carel Fellinger wrote:
> it's because on a teletype you couldn't erase, so backspacing wouldn't
> help in keeping things readeable:)
Hm, ok, that makes sense. I was thinking in the context of dumb
terminals; teletypes were slightly before my time.
--
see shy jo
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:31:04PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've been using linux for years and years, but I have never figured this
> odd little corner out. Perhaps someone here will know.
>
> If you type when the kernel is booting up, it echos to the screen.
> That's normal for linux of course.
Joey Hess wrote:
It doesn't often matter, since there is
> little point to type at the kernel while it's booting, unless you are
> extremely bored during a long fsck. :-)
i think there is a fsck patch to play tetris or something while
the system fscks ...
http://www.movement.uklinux.net/fscktris
I've been using linux for years and years, but I have never figured this
odd little corner out. Perhaps someone here will know.
If you type when the kernel is booting up, it echos to the screen.
That's normal for linux of course. The interesting behavior that
puzzles me is that if you hit the back
1:08 AM
> To: Jay Kelly
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: Basic Kernel Question
>
>
> However for that to work you need to either a) compile support for the
> common
> file systems into the kernel or b) auto load all of those modules at boot.
> [
> you should do mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /floppy. Replace vfat with whatever
> format your floppy is in -- minix, ext2, msdos, etc.
>
> There is a auto option you can place in /etc/fstab for the floppy device.
> However for that to work you need to either a) compile support for the
common
> file sys
On 25-Oct-2000 Jay Kelly wrote:
> Hello All,
> I keep running into a problem everytime I upgrade my kernel. Before I
> upgrade I can place a floppy into the drive and type mount /dev/fd0 /floppy
> with no errors. After the upgrade I do the same command I get an error about
> needing to specifiy th
Hello All,
I keep running into a problem everytime I upgrade my kernel. Before I
upgrade I can place a floppy into the drive and type mount /dev/fd0 /floppy
with no errors. After the upgrade I do the same command I get an error about
needing to specifiy the file format. What am I missing when I upg
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 02:30:15PM -0400, Tim Jump wrote:
> My apologies if this is an rtfm situation, but I haven't been able to
> find the answer in my all-too-brief search.
>
> Do I need to download the kernel-headers package to compile a
> new version of the kernel? What the heck is that fo
"Tim Jump" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My apologies if this is an rtfm situation, but I haven't been able to
> find the answer in my all-too-brief search.
>
> Do I need to download the kernel-headers package to compile a
> new version of the kernel?
No, just download the debianized kernel-s
Nope. You can do this:
apt-get install kernel-source-2.2.17
That will install a bzipped file in /usr/src which you can unzip with
tar Ixvf
Believe me - been there, done that, SEVERAL times in the last week.
john
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Tim Jump wrote:
> My apologies if this is an rtfm situatio
My apologies if this is an rtfm situation, but I haven't been able to
find the answer in my all-too-brief search.
Do I need to download the kernel-headers package to compile a
new version of the kernel? What the heck is that for, anyway?
Thanks in advance...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [] Bababooey D
:: On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 21:22:06 +0300, Heikki Vatiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> In my experience, it is. The laptop I'm using has a 2.4.0-test3
> kernel and the machine at home,
Where did you get a "2.4.0-test3" kernel? The last one I saw was
test2.. There was also a "test2-ac22", in Alan's
Walter Williams wrote:
>
> Greetings
>
> I have subscribed to this list server to find
> out more about non-Red Hat derivatives.
> Is the Debian distribution of the type that I
> can, when I want to update the kernel,
> download a complete kernel tar ball or a patch
> file from what ever web sit
Walter Williams wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I have subscribed to this list server to find
> out more about non-Red Hat derivatives.
> Is the Debian distribution of the type that I
> can, when I want to update the kernel,
> download a complete kernel tar ball or a patch
> file from what ever web site
Walter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have subscribed to this list server to find
> out more about non-Red Hat derivatives.
> Is the Debian distribution of the type that I
> can, when I want to update the kernel,
> download a complete kernel tar ball or a patch
> file from what ever we
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 12:14:13PM -0600, Walter Williams wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I have subscribed to this list server to find
> out more about non-Red Hat derivatives.
> Is the Debian distribution of the type that I
> can, when I want to update the kernel,
> download a complete kernel tar ball
Greetings
I have subscribed to this list server to find
out more about non-Red Hat derivatives.
Is the Debian distribution of the type that I
can, when I want to update the kernel,
download a complete kernel tar ball or a patch
file from what ever web site I choose, install it,
and have things
Dean wrote:
>
> Hi Eric:
> Thanks for the reply. I checked and there is no ppp.o
> in /lib/modules/2.2.15/net, but there is in my old
> kernel at /lib/modules/2.0.36/net. Can I just
> copy that to my 2.2.15 file? Or do I need to
> make up a module? Dean
You need to make a module (and tell th
Hi Eric:
Thanks for the reply. I checked and there is no ppp.o
in /lib/modules/2.2.15/net, but there is in my old
kernel at /lib/modules/2.0.36/net. Can I just
copy that to my 2.2.15 file? Or do I need to
make up a module? Dean
"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:08:29AM -
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:08:29AM -0500, Dean wrote:
> Hi:
>I recently upgraded to potato and decided to upgrade kernel to 2.2.15
>
> same time. Everything went smoothly except I no longer have ppp
> in the kernel. I still have the old kernel to boot to which has ppp.
You sure it's not a
Thanks Ron Dean
>
The kernel doesn't matter AT ALL where the packages install, this is
specified in the debian package.
Ron Rademaker
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Dean wrote:
> Hi:
>I recently upgraded to potato and decided to upgrade kernel to 2.2.15
>
> same time. Everything went smoothly except I no longer have p
Hi:
I recently upgraded to potato and decided to upgrade kernel to 2.2.15
same time. Everything went smoothly except I no longer have ppp
in the kernel. I still have the old kernel to boot to which has ppp.
My question is if I use the old kernel to apt-get something, will
this put whatever I in
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
rickma >So I went back into the xconfig and found that I had somehow turned off
rickma >the virtual and vga consoles. It wasn't hanging at all, the messages
just
rickma >had nowhere to go.
rickma >
rickma >I've built and installed 2.2.14 with gcc 2.95 and
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> > > However, I just recompiled the 2.2.14 kernel (had to change gcc to gcc272
> > > in 3 places in the Makefile), but it still hangs when I boot it.
> > >
> > > It hangs after:
> > > "Decompressing Linux. OK, now boot the kernel".
>
> > Your compiler h
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 04:52:24PM -0700, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> Yes, that's pretty well my next step.
>
> Only one other thought that I have first.
>
> My root partition is 1023 cylinders for the well-known lilo/int13 issue.
> However, this cylinder numbering is the translated LBA stuff. Those
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > However, I just recompiled the 2.2.14 kernel (had to change gcc to gcc272
> > in 3 places in the Makefile), but it still hangs when I boot it.
> >
> > It hangs after:
> > "Decompressing Linux. OK, now boot the kernel".
> Your compiler has nothing t
Also unfortunately many people either have no idea about CMOS setup, or never
fiddle with it. It should be a must to play with CMOS settings whenever you
have a hardware problem or for performance/setup reasons. Check your devices
i.e IDE slave/master, cabling e.t.c.
> timshel:~$ gcc272 -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.7.2.3/specs
> gcc version 2.7.2.3
> timshel:~$ gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/specs
> gcc version 2.95.2 2116 (Debian GNU/Linux)
>
> However, I just recompiled the 2.2.14 kernel (had to ch
Hi,
1. The processor type option is to allow for a) some optimizations and
b) using extensions to the cpu's instruction set that comes with the
processor eg. amd k6 stuff or pentium stuff.
The practical upshot of all this is that you can compile for a 486 and
it should work on an amd k6 or an a
> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 08:51:17 -0800 (PST)
> From: aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Unstable kernel question
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; c
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, aphro wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>
> rickma >I wonder if this is my problem? I just built 2.2.14 on potato, but it
> rickma >fails to boot. It just hangs after saying "OK, boot kernel now". I
> built
> rickma >it with 2.95. Maybe I'll see if the gcc272
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 07:20:44AM -0800, aphro wrote:
> 2.2.14 should work with the athlon, what cpu arch are you telling the
> config program you have? you probably need to tell it Pentium (unless
> there is an athlon option). from what i saw 2.3.x didn't have all the
> athlon patches from 2.2 y
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
rickma >I wonder if this is my problem? I just built 2.2.14 on potato, but it
rickma >fails to boot. It just hangs after saying "OK, boot kernel now". I built
rickma >it with 2.95. Maybe I'll see if the gcc272 package can co-exist with the
rickma >gcc (2.9
> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 08:43:23 -0700 (MST)
> From: Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Unstable kernel question
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; c
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
