On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 09:16:23PM -0700, s. keeling said
> Could someone please 'splain to me what goes with what here? I've
> updated to 3.0r2. The plan so far is:
>
> (i) Install kernel-image-2.4.18-686
> (ii) Go for updated kernel sources and re-build.
>
&
s. keeling wrote:
Could someone please 'splain to me what goes with what here? I've
updated to 3.0r2. The plan so far is:
(i) Install kernel-image-2.4.18-686
(ii) Go for updated kernel sources and re-build.
I see there's kernel-source-2.4.18 and:
kernel-headers-2.4.18
Could someone please 'splain to me what goes with what here? I've
updated to 3.0r2. The plan so far is:
(i) Install kernel-image-2.4.18-686
(ii) Go for updated kernel sources and re-build.
I see there's kernel-source-2.4.18 and:
kernel-headers-2.4.18 - Header files r
n of Debian? Which kernel, exactly?
> Then I'm trying to compile one for it. The result ... compile fine
> but it's give me error while probe the module and after look into,
> this is because the kernel image is 2.4.20 and the kernel source I
> have in /usr/src/ and /usr/include
e but it's give me error while probe the module and after look into,
this is because the kernel image is 2.4.20 and the kernel source I have
in /usr/src/ and /usr/include is 2.4.18
So download the kernel-source-2.4.20.deb and patch it, it's seem like
it's the package only patch the so
386bf (2.4.18-5woody5) stable-security;
urgency=high
* Security update
* Build against kernel-source-2.4.18 2.4.18-14:
^
- Added TASK_SIZE check to do_brk in mm/mmap.c (DSA-403-1)
The README.Debian file (not sure where to find the "changelog&quo
sed). The announcement says ...
>
> -snip-
>
> For Debian it has been fixed in version 2.4.18-12 of the kernel source
> packages . . .
>
> -snip-
>
> When I try "apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18-12" I get "E:
> Couldn't find package kernel-s
n fixed in version 2.4.18-12 of the kernel source packages . . .
-snip-
When I try "apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18-12" I get "E: Couldn't
find package kernel-source-2.4.18-12".
When I try "apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18" I end up with
2.4.18-14, and
Thomas H. George wrote:
My system is testing fully up-to-date. I just ran apt-get update and
apt-get dist-upgrade which installed kernel-source-2.4.18..
My current kernel was built from kernel-source-2.4.22 but I have been
experiencing irratic behavior - specifically many
p80211/knetdev_hard
My system is testing fully up-to-date. I just ran apt-get update and
apt-get dist-upgrade which installed kernel-source-2.4.18..
My current kernel was built from kernel-source-2.4.22 but I have been
experiencing irratic behavior - specifically many
p80211/knetdev_hard-start_xinit: messages
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:23:02 -0600, Kent West wrote:
>Mark Healey wrote:
>
>>There is no networking. I need to build a module for my nic which
>>doesn't have a .deb package. I have the source but need the kernel
>>source which wasn't installed. I discovered th
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:44:14AM +, Sam Bashton wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:53:05AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > I compiled a new kernel from kernel-source-2.6.0-test9 and, after
> > installing module-init-tools, most of my modules are loaded and working
> &
Hi,
I have compiled the Kernel-source-2.6.0-test9 from testing. All is working
well with the exception of my smartmedia. This is giving me a 'wrong fs
type' 99 time out of 100 mounts. From what I've managed to find out 2.6 does
FAT checking that 2.4 (my previous kernel) didn'
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:53:05AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I compiled a new kernel from kernel-source-2.6.0-test9 and, after
> installing module-init-tools, most of my modules are loaded and working
> except for my pci wireless networking card. This has always been
> so
Hi Thomas,
* Thomas H. George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031113 08:18]:
> I compiled a new kernel from kernel-source-2.6.0-test9 and, after
> installing module-init-tools, most of my modules are loaded and working
> except for my pci wireless networking card. This has always been
&
I compiled a new kernel from kernel-source-2.6.0-test9 and, after
installing module-init-tools, most of my modules are loaded and working
except for my pci wireless networking card. This has always been
something of a problem even with the 2.4.xx kernels. apt-get install
linux-wlan-ng
Hello Ron!
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:09:26AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 05:50, Florian Ernst wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:59:05PM -0800, mbc wrote:
>First, I tried copying /boot/config-2.4.22-1-686 to
>/usr/src/linux/.config then doing make mrproper && make oldconfig &&
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 05:50, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Hello mbc!
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:59:05PM -0800, mbc wrote:
> >First, I tried copying /boot/config-2.4.22-1-686 to
> >/usr/src/linux/.config then doing make mrproper && make oldconfig &&
> >make dep && make bzImage && make install && ma
Hello mbc!
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:59:05PM -0800, mbc wrote:
First, I tried copying /boot/config-2.4.22-1-686 to
/usr/src/linux/.config then doing make mrproper && make oldconfig &&
make dep && make bzImage && make install && make modules && make
modules_install. [...]
AFAIR make mrproper re
ppreciated, as I've been
> trying to do this
> for 3 days now so that I can install debian on my
> laptop. Without
> network access, thats rather hard. I've built
> kernels before. I even
> built the lindows kernel debian packages. But right
> now I'm having a
&g
* Please reply to me as I'm not on this list *
Hi. So, I'm trying to build a kernel so that I can compile some modules
I need for my wireless card to work. I want to disable modversions in my
kernel so that the madwifi modules and the bcm4400 module won't complain
about unresolved symbols just be
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 04:32, Herbert Xu wrote:
> David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, well, `even with the same config', meaning that I used the config
> > from kernel-image-2.4.22. That should work, shouldn't it?
>
> No it's not. The precompiled images put vesafb in /lib/modul
David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, well, `even with the same config', meaning that I used the config
> from kernel-image-2.4.22. That should work, shouldn't it?
No it's not. The precompiled images put vesafb in /lib/modules/*/initrd
which means that it is loaded automatically by
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 06:05:23PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Installing kernel-image-2.4.22 I can boot with vga=834 resulting in a
> > nice 1400x1050 framebuffer display with the vesa driver. However,
> > com
David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Installing kernel-image-2.4.22 I can boot with vga=834 resulting in a
> nice 1400x1050 framebuffer display with the vesa driver. However,
> compiling a fresh kernel from kernel-source-2.4.22 (even with the same
> config) results
on driver bug resulting in black
> > screens with standard drivers, though I don't know if this is related...
> >
> > Installing kernel-image-2.4.22 I can boot with vga=834 resulting in a
> > nice 1400x1050 framebuffer display with the vesa driver. However,
> > com
t know if this is related...
>
> Installing kernel-image-2.4.22 I can boot with vga=834 resulting in a
> nice 1400x1050 framebuffer display with the vesa driver. However,
> compiling a fresh kernel from kernel-source-2.4.22 (even with the same
> config) results in a black screen. I can
lting in a
nice 1400x1050 framebuffer display with the vesa driver. However,
compiling a fresh kernel from kernel-source-2.4.22 (even with the same
config) results in a black screen. I can use vga=normal, so I know it
works. I took the time to compile from the sources of
kernel-image-2.4.22 which
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 05:38:18PM -0700, A R wrote:
[quoted from subject]
| No soundcore.o in kernel-source.2.4.21 distributed in SID
Naturally. Object files (.o) are not provided in source packages.
They are found in binary packages only.
[...]
| When I compiled my kernel image, I made sure
After "updatedb"
hpd:~# locate soundcore
/lib/modules/2.4.20-bf2.4/kernel/drivers/sound/soundcore.o
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18/drivers/sound/soundcore.o
/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/utils/patches/soundcore.2.4.20.patch
/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/utils/patches/soundcore.2.4.patch
hp
At Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:38:42 -0400,
Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:57, csj wrote:
> > At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
> > John Hasler wrote:
> > >
> > > csj writes:
> > > > Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
> > >
> > > No. "make config" and "make menuconfig
--- Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:38:42 -0400,
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:57, csj wrote:
> > > At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
> > > John Hasler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > csj
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:38:42 -0400,
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:57, csj wrote:
> > At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
> > John Hasler wrote:
> > >
> > > csj writes:
> > > > Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
> > >
>
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:57, csj wrote:
> At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
> John Hasler wrote:
> >
> > csj writes:
> > > Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
> >
> > No. "make config" and "make menuconfig" still work.
>
> Well, of course ;-). I assume by your statement that "make
> xc
csj writes:
> I assume by your statement that "make xconfig" now requires qt.
I assume so, but I've never tried it.
> And why not gtk (do I see flame war coming)?
Why would you need any GUI at all for configuring a kernel? (Menuconfig is
not a GUI).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Has
At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
John Hasler wrote:
>
> csj writes:
> > Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
>
> No. "make config" and "make menuconfig" still work.
Well, of course ;-). I assume by your statement that "make
xconfig" now requires qt. And why not gtk (do I see flame war
csj writes:
> Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
No. "make config" and "make menuconfig" still work.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
At 12 Sep 2003 23:30:19 -0400,
Neal Lippman wrote:
>
> Has anyone been able to successfully use this package? I
> installed it but make xconfig just dies with a million errors,
> all coming out of scripts/kconfig/qconf.o.
>
> For reference, I have installed libqt-dev, so I thought I would
> be go
Has anyone been able to successfully use this package? I installed it
but make xconfig just dies with a million errors, all coming out of
scripts/kconfig/qconf.o.
For reference, I have installed libqt-dev, so I thought I would be good
to go
Debian version is testing, btw.
Thanks.
nl
--
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 01:00:13PM -0700, M.Forbes wrote:
> I need to know what the name and location would be as for the kernel-source in
> order to get my Ethernet card working.
> I was getting an error in line 27 that the kernel source was not able to be found.
> I was able to
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:00:13 -0700,
"M.Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I need to know what the name and location would be as for the
> kernel-source in order to get my Ethernet card working. I was getting
..ok, you told us
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:00:13 -0700
"M.Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to know what the name and location would be as for the
> kernel-source in order to get my Ethernet card working.
> I was getting an error in line 27 that the kernel source was not able
* M.Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030823 22:00]:
> I am currently running the woody 3 distro of Debian with kernel
> 2.4.18.
> Can someone throw me a clue? (I tried #ksrc
> :=/usr/src/kernel-source-2.x.xx but there are no files that are
> showing in my usr directory or the su
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:20:14 +0200, M.Forbes wrote:
> I need to know what the name and location would be as for the
> kernel-source in order to get my Ethernet card working.
> I was getting an error in line 27 that the kernel source was not able to
> be found. I was able to find th
I need to know what the name and location
would be as for the kernel-source in order to get my Ethernet card working.
I was getting an error in line 27 that the
kernel source was not able to be found.
I was able to find that I have to adjust the
following line of code:
#ksrc
:=/usr/sr
I can not see the configuration files that are mentioed in
kernel-source-2.6.0-test2/Documentation/pnp.txt. As a result, I can not
configure the isa pnp cards in the way I want them to be.
In praticular, should /driver be under the root fs or is it to be
found in /proc? If it is under /root
installing
X in "Woody" before doing the upgrade to "Sid."
(from an earlier post)
>Do you have your kernel's header or source?
Kernel headers. I'm not sure where to get the source... currently don't care either
if things can be taken care of with the headers.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 06:40:39AM -0400, Michael Bonert wrote:
>
> MODIFY '/etc/X11/XF86Config-4':
> Section "Module"
> # Load "GLcore" # REMOVED nvidia
> Load "bitmap"
> Load "dbe"
> Load "ddc"
> # Load "dri"# REMOVED nvidia
This may not be rel
de the
output of "ps axf > /tmp/ps.log" at the time? It might help to so what
is running (or not) at the time.
> Newbie Question:
> Why wasn't the "nvidia-glx" package installed when I grabbed
> 'nvidia-kernel-source'?
>
> I thought that the whol
h a square cursor at the top left.
-
Newbie Question:
Why wasn't the "nvidia-glx" package installed when I grabbed 'nvidia-kernel-source'?
I thought that the whole idea of 'apt-get' was to avoid having to think about
dependencies and thus avoid the dependency
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:53:13AM +0200, Engosh wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 05:14:55 -0400 (EDT) Michael Bonert wrote:
>
> > I'm still having some problems and I think it lies somewhere with the
> > module configuration.
> >
> > Screen capture from 'startx':
> > ---SNIP---
> > (==) Using config
nused)
> keybdev 1664 0 (unused)
> usbkbd 2848 0 (unused)
> input 3040 0 [keybdev usbkbd]
> usb-ohci 17472 0 (unused)
> usbcore48000 0 [usbkbd usb-ohci]
> -
>
> I don't und
tand where I'm going wrong and I feel that I'm stuck. :(
Answering my own question from earlier:
>> What is the difference between 'nvidia-kernel-source' and
>> 'nvidia-kernel-src'?
'nvidia-kernel-src' is older
I did my first bug report--related to was
Package:
kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurityVersion: 1.9.4-3
the patch gives a conflict when trying to
apply to nesest kernel-source(2.4.18-12). The patch probably solves a bug
that was solved in last updateof kernel-source.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18
I followed the instructions on the 'nvidia-kernel-source 1.0.4496-2' page
(http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/nvidia-kernel-source.html).
It suggusts working through instructions in a file called 'README.Debian'
(full path '/usr/share/doc/nvidia-ke
On Sunday 10 August 2003 17:58, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> On Sunday 10 August 2003 15:40, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> > * Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030810 14:51]:
> > > I got the kernel-source-2.4.21 package (wich is the debian patched
> > > version of
On Monday 04 August 2003 4:20 pm, Rich Puhek wrote:
>
> Very handy to compile on one machine, scp kernal_image.servername.1
> servername:/usr/local/src and dpkg -i the image...
>
There is no doubt about the advantages of compiling in one machine for many...
but if you only have one, then I do not
Hi
I got the kernel-source-2.4.21 package (wich is the debian patched version of
the official kernel). I also got the XFS patch from SGI for the 2.4.21 kernel
(ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/2.4.21/xfs-2.4.21-all-i386.bz2).
As i tried to patch the kernel i run into
On Sunday 10 August 2003 15:40, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030810 14:51]:
> > I got the kernel-source-2.4.21 package (wich is the debian patched
> > version of the official kernel). I also got the XFS patch from SGI for
> >
this approved
> by someone before i spend time in destroying my system :))
Note that you can use "kernel-package" to build a kernel from most any
kernel source, not just those in Debian. I've used it to build
kernels from sources I downloaded from kernel.org dozens of times.
Michael Bonert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I followed the instructions on the 'nvidia-kernel-source 1.0.4496-2' page
> (http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/nvidia-kernel-source.html).
> It suggusts working through instructions in a file called 'README.Debian
* Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030810 14:51]:
> I got the kernel-source-2.4.21 package (wich is the debian patched version of
> the official kernel). I also got the XFS patch from SGI for the 2.4.21 kernel
> (ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/2.4.21/xfs-
* Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030810 17:52]:
> > If you use Debians Kernel-Sources, why don't you use Debian xfs-patch,
> > too?
> OOPS is there one?
:-)
Yes it ist:
$ apt-cache search xfs patch
kernel-patch-xfs - XFS Filesystem support for Linux 2.4.20 and 2.4.21
Works grate, if y
On Monday 04 August 2003 3:43 pm, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:29:51PM -0500, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> > I cannot help you with the debian way... that I found more complex than
> > the regular way.
> >
> > Download a pristine kernel (get 2.6.0-test2)
> > cd /usr/src
> > Un
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:29:51PM -0500, Marino Fernandez wrote:
I cannot help you with the debian way... that I found more complex than the
regular way.
Download a pristine kernel (get 2.6.0-test2)
cd /usr/src
Untar kernel in /usr/src
mv linux linux~
ln -s linux-2.6.0-
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:29:51PM -0500, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> I cannot help you with the debian way... that I found more complex than the
> regular way.
>
> Download a pristine kernel (get 2.6.0-test2)
> cd /usr/src
> Untar kernel in /usr/src
> mv linux linux~
> ln -s linux-2.6.0-test2 linu
Depends dependency for kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386 cannot be
> satisfied because the package kernel-source-2.6.0-test1 cannot be found
>
>
I cannot help you with the debian way... that I found more complex than the
regular way.
Download a pristine kernel (get 2.6.0-test2)
cd /usr/src
Untar
doesn't work :-|
tanna:~/tmp/kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386-2.6.0-test1# apt-get build-dep
kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Build-Depends dependency for kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386 cannot be satisfied
because the package k
Hello,
Is this working with test2 flavour ??
François
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 21:46:22 CEST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Le Dimanche 3 Août 2003 21:26, Travis Crump a écrit :
> > Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
> >
#include
* Travis Crump [Sun, Aug 03 2003, 03:26:07PM]:
> Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
apt-get source kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386
apt-get build-dep kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386
MfG,
Eduard.
--
Labello und kein Kuß quietscht mehr.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 22:26, Travis Crump wrote:
> Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
> kernel-source-2.6.0-test1 doesn't exist as far as I can determine[and
> apt-get source kernel-source-2.6.0-test1-i386 and/or apt-get build-dep
> ke
Le Dimanche 3 Août 2003 21:26, Travis Crump a écrit :
> Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
> kernel-source-2.6.0-test1 doesn't exist as far as I can determine[and
> apt-get source kernel-source-2.6.0-test1-i386 and/or apt-get build-dep
> ke
Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
kernel-source-2.6.0-test1 doesn't exist as far as I can determine[and
apt-get source kernel-source-2.6.0-test1-i386 and/or apt-get build-dep
kernel-source-2.6.0-test1 suggest that is where the source should be and
As an update with my inability to unarchive my copy of the
kernel-source**.deb.
Since I wasn't having any luck on this machine, I copied the *.bz file
to my other machine (RH 7.3), and proceeded to "bzip2 -d" & "tar xvf"
resulting in a good archive.
I again tried on
What's not clear to me (unless I just missed in my coffee-less state) is
what is required, if anything since I'm using:
ii kernel-source- 2.4.21-2 Linux kernel source for version 2.4.21 with
The advisory mentions 2.4.21 a few places, not not for all problems.
For example
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:28:03 -0700
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030730 13:50]:
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:44:49 -0700
> > Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > * Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030729 21:12]:
> > > > Well, on of
* Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030730 13:50]:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:44:49 -0700
> Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030729 21:12]:
> > > Well, on of the maintainers closed the report. Seems it's supposed
> > > to be a bad download.
> >
rror has a bad deb?
>
> wingnut:/usr/src% ls -l kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 31380359 2003-05-07 04:29
> kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2 wingnut:/usr/src% md5sum !$
> md5sum kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2
> 6dd321baccff1dc26b56bcdabcadf285 kernel-sour
* Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030729 21:12]:
> Well, on of the maintainers closed the report. Seems it's supposed to be
> a bad download.
Works for me. Maybe your mirror has a bad deb?
wingnut:/usr/src% ls -l kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r--1 root root 31
Well, on of the maintainers closed the report. Seems it's supposed to be
a bad download.
Just tried again, and the file size is the same, and the same result.
Oh well, I guess tinkering with building kernels' wasn't meant to be
--
Rodney D. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Registered Linux User #9
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:36:04 +0200
Tobias Bär <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodney D. Myers schrieb:
> > Who do I contact about a bad *.deb file?
> >
> > Everytime I try to "bzip2 d" the above file I get;
> >
> > bzip2 --test kernel-source-2.5.6
Rodney D. Myers schrieb:
Who do I contact about a bad *.deb file?
Everytime I try to "bzip2 d" the above file I get;
bzip2 --test kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2
bzip2: kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2: data integrity (CRC) error in data
You can use the `bzip2recover' program to attempt
Rodney D. Myers schrieb:
Who do I contact about a bad *.deb file?
Everytime I try to "bzip2 d" the above file I get;
bzip2 --test kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2
bzip2: kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2: data integrity (CRC) error in data
You can use the `bzip2recover' program to attempt
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:41:58PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> Who do I contact about a bad *.deb file?
File a bug report; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Who do I contact about a bad *.deb file?
Everytime I try to "bzip2 d" the above file I get;
bzip2 --test kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2
bzip2: kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2: data integrity (CRC) error in data
You can use the `bzip2recover' program to attempt to recover
data from und
#include
* martin f krafft [Tue, Jul 22 2003, 08:20:25AM]:
> > If the kernel is installed and running, would "uname -r" get what you
> > need? Or if not installed, would running dpkg --contents on the .deb
> > and seeing what the /lib/modules/xxx directory name is do it?
>
> It's installed, bu
#include
* martin f krafft [Tue, Jul 22 2003, 08:15:35AM]:
> 2.4.20-8 is the revision. I would like to know which revision the
> kernel on the LT2003 CDs are.
RTF Changelog.Debian.gz, should not be THAT complicated.
MfG,
Eduard.
--
Zugschlus: Du untertreibst mal wieder maßlos.
Alfie: so bin
also sprach David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.22.0053 +0200]:
> If the kernel is installed and running, would "uname -r" get what you
> need? Or if not installed, would running dpkg --contents on the .deb
> and seeing what the /lib/modules/xxx directory name is do it?
It's installed, but uname
> /lib/modules/2.4.20xxx
> and you want to know what the xxx is?
That's not the revision, that's the version appendix. In my case, it
is -bf2.4 .
> Or, something else.
kernel-source-2.4.20_2.4.20-8_all.deb
2.4.20-8 is the revision. I would like
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:00:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I need to compile a module to be used with the LT 2003 Debian CD,
> which comes with the 2.4.20-bf2.4 kernel. I can't seem to find the
> kernel-source package. Of course, there is kernel-source-2.4.20, but
> I
#include
* martin f krafft [Mon, Jul 21 2003, 03:00:14PM]:
> I need to compile a module to be used with the LT 2003 Debian CD,
> which comes with the 2.4.20-bf2.4 kernel. I can't seem to find the
apt-cache search kernel headers 2.4.20
MfG,
Eduard.
--
Alfie: in zukunft frag mich einfach, bevor
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 10:56, martin f krafft wrote:
> I also found that. My problem, and I probably wasn't quite clear
> enough is that I don't know what revision to use for the kernel
> module package.
You want to know the revision of the kernel modules that go with this
kernel (are installed if
also sprach Bret Comstock Waldow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.21.1554 +0200]:
> I don't believe the bf2.4 represents a different kernel source - rather
> it's a particular configuration of the 2.4.20 kernel, for installing
> ("bf" = "boot floppy" II
I don't believe the bf2.4 represents a different kernel source - rather
it's a particular configuration of the 2.4.20 kernel, for installing
("bf" = "boot floppy" IIRC).
You can copy the config- file from /boot to
/usr/src/linux/.config (note the .) to du
I need to compile a module to be used with the LT 2003 Debian CD,
which comes with the 2.4.20-bf2.4 kernel. I can't seem to find the
kernel-source package. Of course, there is kernel-source-2.4.20, but
I don't know which revision is on the CD (as the initially installed
Linux ker
Vineet Kumar escribio el 14/07/03 20:10:
Debian's kernel-source package does include the debian patches. The
description of kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21 says it should be applied to
"pristine" kernel source, meaning an unpatched tarball from kernel.org.
Now it seems logical. Thanks
* Ismael Valladolid Torres ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030714 11:00]:
> Hi,
>
> The description of the kernel-source-2.4.21 package says "Linux kernel
> source for version 2.4.21 with Debian patches". But, there is another
> package called kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21 whose
Hi,
The description of the kernel-source-2.4.21 package says "Linux kernel
source for version 2.4.21 with Debian patches". But, there is another
package called kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21 whose description says "Debian
patches to Linux 2.4.21". Bizarrely enough, this sec
Op wo 02-07-2003, om 21:18 schreef Kevin Mark:
> >
> > I wrote the documentation
> > for myself and have offered it to the open source community as a
> > "here you might find this useful" kind of document. I was then asked
> > by one debian user to contribute my documentation to The LDP.
> > T
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:51:47AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:33:09PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > However, I'll stop here and not say anything more unless there are
> > specific questions; I think I've put forward my point as best I can and
> > your licensing dec
301 - 400 of 742 matches
Mail list logo
