On Friday 14 November 2003 06:27, Ken Gilmour wrote:
> im sure that if theres a way to configure one to, in a sense "crossover" it
> might work.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ken Gilmour
> You may be beautiful but they're keeping my idea on file.
>
> Registered Linux User # 330371
> http://counter.li.org
>
im sure that if theres a way to configure one to, in a sense "crossover" it might work.
Best Regards,
Ken Gilmour
You may be beautiful but they're keeping my idea on file.
Registered Linux User # 330371
http://counter.li.org
Replying to the message sent by Adam Galant on Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:5
Hi.
I'm not quite sure, but I think you need an acess point - a device similar
to hub for 'copper' LANs. I don't think two wireless LAN cards can talk to
each other directly (although, as I said, I am not quite sure).
Regards,
Adam
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Japox wrote:
> I have just recently bou
I have just recently bought a DELL inspiron 500m
which has a wireless card built in... how do i get two of the same type
notebooks to get wireless LAN...
JAPOX
Look at dnsmasq package (thekelleys.org.uk I think - or
just google find). Its simple and easy and much better
than bind for small LANS. Excellent!
On Thursday 31 January 2002 20:11, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've got my LAN set up and running, and so far so good.
> I'm using a gat
Thus spake Jason Majors:
> I'd suspect exim is set up incorrectly then. Run eximconfig and set up all
> your boxes as type 1 (Internet Site). That's how mine is setup. But I have
> fetchmail running on my mail server pull mail from the other boxes, so I
> only have one mail account to check. But I
> I've got my LAN set up and running, and so far so good. I'm using a
> gateway/router/firewall (hadrian) to stop unwanted traffic and allow
> internet access and LAN access to everybody else. Then I have
> gashuffer, my main workstation, and a Win box that my girlfriend uses,
> and an occasional
Hello all,
I've got my LAN set up and running, and so far so good. I'm using a
gateway/router/firewall (hadrian) to stop unwanted traffic and allow
internet access and LAN access to everybody else. Then I have
gashuffer, my main workstation, and a Win box that my girlfriend uses,
and an occasiona
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:36:39PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
| I am Debian newbie. I have a LAN that was running and is now in need of
| reconstruction. On the LAN were two Linux boxes and two Macs. The Linux
| box that provided internet access via ppp has a Netgear fa311 NIC. This
| card is not
On Sun, 2001-12-02 at 15:36, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I am Debian newbie. I have a LAN that was running and is now in need of
> reconstruction. On the LAN were two Linux boxes and two Macs. The Linux
> box that provided internet access via ppp has a Netgear fa311 NIC. This
> card is not supported by
On Sunday 02 December 2001 01:36 pm, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I am Debian newbie. I have a LAN that was running and is now in need of
> reconstruction. On the LAN were two Linux boxes and two Macs. The Linux
> box that provided internet access via ppp has a Netgear fa311 NIC. This
> card is not suppo
I am Debian newbie. I have a LAN that was running and is now in need of
reconstruction. On the LAN were two Linux boxes and two Macs. The Linux
box that provided internet access via ppp has a Netgear fa311 NIC. This
card is not supported by potato. I have obtained another NIC, a Linksys
LNE100TX, w
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 11:55:51PM +, Darren Wyn Rees wrote:
> I am using Donald Becker's ether-wake v.1.03 with some 3COM 905
> NICs, however I am unable to 'wake' any machines.
>
> I send the magic packet using the correct MAC address :
>
> debian:~/ether-wake-1.03.orig# ./etherwake -D -b
I am using Donald Becker's ether-wake v.1.03 with some 3COM 905
NICs, however I am unable to 'wake' any machines.
I send the magic packet using the correct MAC address :
debian:~/ether-wake-1.03.orig# ./etherwake -D -b 00:50:DA:34:61:23
Command line stations address is 00:50:da:34:61:23.
Packet
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:13:02AM -0500 or thereabouts, Matthew Garman wrote:
>
> Does anyone out there have a home LAN setup using non-routable IP
> addresses (e.g. 192.168.x.x)? And if so, do you have postfix running as
> the MTA on more than one machine in the LAN?
>
Yes.
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:13:02AM -0500, Matthew Garman wrote:
> Have you been able to get postfix to send mail to different machines on
> the LAN (completely internal, no external DNS routing)?
I'm sure this is possible with a Postfix 'transport map', like
your.host.name smtp:[192.168
is slightly off-topic, but I thought I'd give it a go...
>
> Does anyone out there have a home LAN setup using non-routable IP
> addresses (e.g. 192.168.x.x)? And if so, do you have postfix running as
> the MTA on more than one machine in the LAN?
>
> Have you been able to ge
This is slightly off-topic, but I thought I'd give it a go...
Does anyone out there have a home LAN setup using non-routable IP
addresses (e.g. 192.168.x.x)? And if so, do you have postfix running as
the MTA on more than one machine in the LAN?
Have you been able to get postfix to send ma
18 matches
Mail list logo
