On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:25:16 +0200, Almut Behrens wrote:
> BTW, for the sake of completeness [...]
wow, that's a comprehensive explanation. Thanks a lot (I archived the msg
right away).
never underestimate the power of this mlist.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:23:00 -0400, T wrote:
> thanks. Roberto for the reply. I am now confirmed that it is not the
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH's problem. Maybe transcode is looking for its libs in a
> fixed location or something.
yes, this part confirmed. transcode hardcode where to look for its libs.
st
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:23:00PM -0400, T wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:17:44 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> >> We used the environment var LD_LIBRARY_PATH to give preference/order of
> >> the libraries that we use. Does this still applied to Linux?
> >>
> >> I tried to do it under Linu
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:17:44 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> We used the environment var LD_LIBRARY_PATH to give preference/order of
>> the libraries that we use. Does this still applied to Linux?
>>
>> I tried to do it under Linux but didn't success. Here is what I tried:
>>
>> [...]
>
> I
T wrote:
> Hi
>
> In the Solaris environment in the big firm that I worked with previously,
> they have multi-version of anything, from Perl to Tcl/Tk, and even X.
>
> We used the environment var LD_LIBRARY_PATH to give preference/order of
> the libraries that we use. Does this still applied to
Hi
In the Solaris environment in the big firm that I worked with previously,
they have multi-version of anything, from Perl to Tcl/Tk, and even X.
We used the environment var LD_LIBRARY_PATH to give preference/order of
the libraries that we use. Does this still applied to Linux?
I tried to do
6 matches
Mail list logo
