On 25/11/11 18:56, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:45:25 +1100
> Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
> Hello Scott,
>
>> Problem seems to be your mirror (perhaps an upgrade is in progress) -
>
> mozilla.debian.net has been in this state for almost a week.
Certainly was working November 10, def
FWIW testing today, perhaps already yesterday, switched to version 8.
Haven't read the thread, but IIUC there's an issue with backports
regarding to version 8 for stable?!
You could try to upgrade Iceweasel only from testing.
OT: Won't capture this thread, so please don't reply to the following b
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:45:25 +1100
Scott Ferguson wrote:
Hello Scott,
> Problem seems to be your mirror (perhaps an upgrade is in progress) -
mozilla.debian.net has been in this state for almost a week.
> only Sid seems to have the required version available.
That's stupid; Why didn't the ba
On 25/11/11 08:21, Rob Hurle wrote:
> Hi Andrew and Brad,
>
> On 25 November 2011 00:44, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:26:47 -0500
>> Andrew Reid wrote:
>>
>> Hello Andrew,
>>
>>> You need to specify the backport repo in order to get the
>>> dependencies to work, I think.
>>
>>
Hi Andrew and Brad,
On 25 November 2011 00:44, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:26:47 -0500
> Andrew Reid wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew,
>
>> You need to specify the backport repo in order to get the
>> dependencies to work, I think.
>
> Dunno about Rob, but I'd already done that. Trying
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:26:47 -0500
Andrew Reid wrote:
Hello Andrew,
> You need to specify the backport repo in order to get the
> dependencies to work, I think.
Dunno about Rob, but I'd already done that. Trying to upgrade Iceweasel
fails due to the fact xulrunner isn't going to be installe
On 24/11/11 14:57, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> NOTE: I have since been getting a message about an expired signing key,
>> perhaps that is the problem in your case.
>
> The previous key expired mozilla.debian.net archive signing key
> expired 2011-11-20. You need to get the n
Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Rob Hurle wrote:
> > Recently there seemed to be a change to the gpg key for the version of
> > iceweasel that I use and I had to wget the new one. That's OK.
What does this say?
apt-cache policy iceweasel
> NOTE: I have since been getting a message about an expired si
> Dear All,
> An attempt to reinstall iceweasel produces:
>
> # apt-get --reinstall install iceweasel
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situat
On 24/11/11 10:34, Rob Hurle wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm running a standard squeeze i386 system and regularly do:
>
> apt-get update
> apt-get upgrade
>
> Recently there seemed to be a change to the gpg key for the version of
> iceweasel that I use and I had to wget the new one. That's OK. No
Dear All,
I'm running a standard squeeze i386 system and regularly do:
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
Recently there seemed to be a change to the gpg key for the version of
iceweasel that I use and I had to wget the new one. That's OK. Now I
get, when I do the upgrade (dist-upgrade in this c
11 matches
Mail list logo
