On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:24:27AM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
:Right Answer: LaTeX2e is intended to be a mostly-compatible successor
:to LaTeX 2.09.
Thanks, I'll try that first, this is all complecated by the fact that
I know *nothing* about TeX of any flavor...
:(I know that LaTeX2e isn't 100%
Jonathan D Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JDP> Don't ask me why 'cus I don't know, but my fearless leader has decided
JDP> he needs an ancient version of LaTex on his spiffy new Debian laptop.
JDP>
JDP> Since this is from Dec 1989, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess I
JDP> can't get a .de
>
> Hi,
>
> Don't ask me why 'cus I don't know, but my fearless leader has decided
> he needs an ancient version of LaTex on his spiffy new Debian laptop.
>
> Since this is from Dec 1989, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess I
> can't get a .deb for it :)
>
> Anyone have a clue where I coul
Hi,
Don't ask me why 'cus I don't know, but my fearless leader has decided
he needs an ancient version of LaTex on his spiffy new Debian laptop.
Since this is from Dec 1989, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess I
can't get a .deb for it :)
Anyone have a clue where I could find source, and wha
4 matches
Mail list logo
