for the PIC microcontrollers which needs a number
> of libraries in order to build. My last impediment to a successful
> build appears to be the lack of the libraries mentioned below and I am
> trying to figure out how to either fix what is broken or add the
> libraries I need. I
I rebuilt my Debian sarge system last june from the
installation image and the network. It is one of the most stable and
healthy-looking installations I have ever had. I recently tried to
install an emulator for the PIC microcontrollers which needs a number
of libraries in order to build
hanger.conf', 'disklist', etc.
>
>However cannot get amanda and the 'tpchanger' chg-zd-mtx to backup
> any disk that is larger than the size of one tape in the library.
> Sort of defeats the whole purpose of using amanda and tape
> libraries.
This is a basic lim
e 'tpchanger' chg-zd-mtx to backup any disk
that is larger than the size of one tape in the library. Sort of defeats the
whole purpose of using amanda and tape libraries.
Plus no data is written to the disk cache, '/var/tmp', either when tape
drive fails for whatever reason, as
Hi, I'm trying to install the amule package on Unstable and there is an
unsatisfied dependency, with a package name `libcrypto++5.2c2' . I have
installed amule before, but I've recently reinstalled debian and now
there is this dependency thing. I have searched aptitude for this
libcrypto++, and the
>You need the "libncurses5-dev" package.
Thank you. It looks like things are more healthy now.
Martin McCormick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;
>>>Unable to find the Ncurses libraries.
>>>
>>>You must install ncurses-devel in order
>>>to use 'make menuconfig'
>>>
>>>
>
> I used apt-get to try to find a package with that name to no
>avail. I also looked
I went to modify a kernel build on a system I rebuilt last
Summer. When I gave the command
make menuconfig
I got the following error message:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lncurses
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> Unable to find the Ncurses libraries.
>>
>> You mu
Hi,
I am using Fedora Core 4 and I have the same problem...when opening xine
I get the same error. I was wondering if you have already solved the
problem and more important...HOW?? I did the trick cd /usr/lib
# ln -s libcrypto.so.0.9.7 libcrypto.so.4
# ln -s libssl.so.0.9.7 libssl.so.4, but it did
Thanks a lot for your recomendation about qemu, i can compile it and
it works grate and also i can run the bochs virtual disk with the OS
inside.
Pablo E. Bullian
to use.
You might want to give it a shot.
> configure: WARNING: Bochs for wxWidgets cannot be compiled here, disabling it
> checking for default gui on this platform... x11
> ERROR: X windows gui was selected, but X windows libraries were not found.
>
> I think i have to tell in the
ui on this platform... x11
ERROR: X windows gui was selected, but X windows libraries were not found.
I think i have to tell in the ./configure where the libraries are, but
where are they??
Thanks a lot
Well I now have 1.2 Gigs free on my 3 Gig root partition. Amazing!
I was down to nearly 300 Megs before.
Brian Kimball wrote:
Just so you know, aptitude's fullscreen interface can be heavily
customized to your liking. You can decide what information should be
shown on each line in the packag
fraz wrote:
> I'll give aptitude another go in the future.
Just so you know, aptitude's fullscreen interface can be heavily
customized to your liking. You can decide what information should be
shown on each line in the package list (name, version, size, priority,
description, etc). I've curr
fraz:
> Jochen Schulz wrote:
> >
> >Beware that aptitude in its default configuration always treats
> >packages' recommends as if they were dependencies. You can easily switch
> >it off in the options menu when starting aptitude with no arguments.
>
> I'll give aptitude another go in the future. I
Jochen Schulz wrote:
fraz:
[...] For future reference is there a better way to remove packages so
the unused dependencies are also removed?
If you use aptitude to install packages, it will remember which packages
have been installed just because something you really wanted depended on
it. If
fraz wrote:
> How can I find libraries etc that were installed as dependencies, but
> which currently have no "dependants" installed? IE the package that
> caused apt to install them isn't installed anymore.
Personally I used aptitude for this. I simply marked th
frazu wrote:
> How can I find libraries etc that were installed as dependencies, but
> which currently have no "dependants" installed? IE the package that
> caused apt to install them isn't installed anymore.
Note the use of backtics as opposed to quotes here:
fraz:
>
> [...] For future reference is there a better way to remove packages so
> the unused dependencies are also removed?
If you use aptitude to install packages, it will remember which packages
have been installed just because something you really wanted depended on
it. If you decide to remove
Thanks all!
98 Megs freed! My root partition was getting a little tight. I knew
there had to something to do the job. :D Orphaner was pretty straight
forward.
Some of it was old -dev packages so I could compile programs from the
authors tarballs while helping debug. And a few other random th
fraz wrote:
How can I find libraries etc that were installed as dependencies, but
which currently have no "dependants" installed? IE the package that
caused apt to install them isn't installed anymore.
I've been apt-getting and removing packages on my system for the
Le Sunday 26 June 2005 13:47, fraz(fraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
disait:
> How can I find libraries etc that were installed as dependencies,
> but which currently have no "dependants" installed? IE the package
> that caused apt to install them isn't installed anymor
On Sunday 26 of June 2005 13:47, fraz wrote:
> How can I find libraries etc that were installed as dependencies, but
> which currently have no "dependants" installed? IE the package that
> caused apt to install them isn't installed anymore.
>
> I've been apt-
How can I find libraries etc that were installed as dependencies, but
which currently have no "dependants" installed? IE the package that
caused apt to install them isn't installed anymore.
I've been apt-getting and removing packages on my system for the last 4
years. And
d probably make an ext2 floppy and include
> > major
> > binaries such as
> > - bash
> > - login
> > - mount
why those binaries ???
- you will need to know why and which binaries
to include
login is not needed ... since you're trying
For those, who like me were rookies and who wonder
about shared library path a good how to
http://users.actcom.co.il/~choo/lupg/tutorials/libraries/unix-c-libraries.html
--- Stephane Durieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> hello
>
> I am trying to make my own floppy roo
hello
I am trying to make my own floppy root image
But I don t know how to do
I should probably make an ext2 floppy and include
major
binaries such as
- bash
- login
- mount
but I have also to include shared libraries .so
and I think I can't only copy them from hdd to the
floppy
I
Lee Braiden wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 22:09, Scarletdown wrote:
cinelerra: Depends: libavcodec1 (>= 1:0.4.8) but it is not installable
Depends: libguicast (>= 1:1.2.2) but it is not installable
Depends: liblame0 (>= 3.96.1-1) but it is not installable
Depends:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 22:09, Scarletdown wrote:
> cinelerra: Depends: libavcodec1 (>= 1:0.4.8) but it is not installable
> Depends: libguicast (>= 1:1.2.2) but it is not installable
> Depends: liblame0 (>= 3.96.1-1) but it is not installable
> Depends: libmpeg3
I'm trying to get Cinelerra installed. However, there's several
libraries missing, that do not appear to be available via apt-get
(sid). here's the error that I get when I attempt to install
Cinelerra via dpkg:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
cinelerra: Depen
Hello,
for some libraries, there are different versions concurrently available, and
different packages are built with different versions of those libraries.
In such cases, this may cause different versions to be installed, even if
it's not really needed.
Example (atm on sarge):
% grep-s
I posted this on the evening of Nov 21, and again last night (Nov 22)
about 27 hours after the original post. It has now been another 13
hours since the second post and I have still not seen my post come back
to me. Yesterday, I was unable to even connect to lists.debian.org to
even see if my
thanks for the information.
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Aube" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "wayne A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: upgraded libraries
> On Sunday 12 September 2004 08:24 am, wayne A wrote
Wayne Ayotte wrote:
> I have installed debian 3.0r2. I would like to install aspell and a few
> other packages. They all report dependencies such as; libc6 2.3.2.ds1-4
> and telling me I have 2.2.5-11.5. I take it I need to upgrade my c
> libraries. I have tried using apt-get ins
I have installed debian 3.0r2. I would like to
install aspell and a few other packages. They all report dependencies such as;
libc6 2.3.2.ds1-4 and telling me I have 2.2.5-11.5. I take it I need to
upgrade my c libraries. I have tried using apt-get install, but it tells me I
have the
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 08:17:42AM -0400, Loki wrote:
> But your local libraries & executables should all be in /usr/local.
> autoconf-based configure scripts default to installing in /usr/local, so I
Which is why utilities such as 'stow' and 'checkinstall'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, P V Mathew wrote:
> I am using Debian sid. I had also installed some packages and libraries
> from original tar balls also. Now I think there are conflicts between some
> installed libraries.
> Is there an
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 07:27 +0530, P V Mathew wrote:
> Hello
> I am using Debian sid. I had also installed some packages and libraries
> from original tar balls also. Now I think there are conflicts between some
> installed libraries.
> Is there any utility or option for d
Hello
I am using Debian sid. I had also installed some packages and libraries
from original tar balls also. Now I think there are conflicts between some
installed libraries.
Is there any utility or option for dpkg which lists
libraries/executables
which are not installed by dpkg?
p v
On Wednesday 04 August 2004 06:22, Brad Camroux hurled the following on the
wire:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just wondering if there are any PHP-GD packages available in .deb
> format. I've googled, apt-cached, apt-get'ed, all to no avail. Any help
> would be greatly appreciated.
I'm running sarge, and
Hi all,
I'm just wondering if there are any PHP-GD packages available in .deb format. I've
googled, apt-cached, apt-get'ed,
all to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
--
+--+---+
|Brad Camroux | === http://
Hi,
I have been using Debian for five or so years now and have basically learned
most of Linux on Debian, hence I post my question to this list. When I
compile software such as PHP with imap, Exim with Mysql, or PHP with
Openldap, I find that often the libraries or includes are not found even
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:47:15PM -0400, Bob Tilley (AT&T) wrote:
> I am receiving "bad interpreter" error messages when trying to run a script
> that uses XML:Mechanize. Perhaps I need missing libraries?
>
> My Perl is /usr/bin/perl.
This error message also occur
I am receiving "bad interpreter" error messages when trying to run a script that uses
XML:Mechanize. Perhaps I need missing libraries?
My Perl is /usr/bin/perl.
Robert
--
The content of the message is a reflection only of the writer and not of AT&T or
Tybrin.
Robert
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:13:07 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Please excuse the OTness of this post. Since I am writing a library
> to be included in Debian, I feel that I should not be slaughtered
> for bothering you and hoping for your time and knowledge.
>
It wouldn't be OT if y
Hi there,
Please excuse the OTness of this post. Since I am writing a library
to be included in Debian, I feel that I should not be slaughtered
for bothering you and hoping for your time and knowledge.
I have a question about shared libraries. Even though I did search
the web, I could not find a
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:50:21PM -0600, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I always thought that the libxx.a libraries are needed to compile
> programs. However it appears that it is
> possible to compile programs without them (I suppose this means .so
> version wil
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:50:21PM -0600, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I always thought that the libxx.a libraries are needed to compile
> programs. However it appears that it is
> possible to compile programs without them (I suppose this means .so
> version wil
Hi,
I always thought that the libxx.a libraries are needed to compile
programs. However it appears that it is
possible to compile programs without them (I suppose this means .so
version will be used). This I gather from the
response from the debian maintainer of libqt-dev (testing) - libqt-dev
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 09:19:19AM -0500, michelle wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Remember that you need to link with -lm in order to call mathematical
> > functions like sqrt().
>
> Thanks, that's it.
> After re-running, the fprintf went away as well. (That must have been
> linker garbage due
Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Remember that you need to link with -lm in order to call mathematical
> functions like sqrt().
>
Thanks, that's it.
After re-running, the fprintf went away as well. (That must have been
linker garbage due to 100 previous errors.)
I'm down to one error now. The linker c
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 06:39:42AM -0500, michelle said
> and my marbles, I think.
>
> I can still compile "hello world", but I'm getting link errors if I call
> math or file functions (basic stuff like sqrt, fprintf). They've been
> available so long through the default library path that I don'
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 06:39:42AM -0500, michelle wrote:
> I can still compile "hello world", but I'm getting link errors if I call
> math or file functions (basic stuff like sqrt, fprintf). They've been
> available so long through the default library path that I don't know where
> to find them
and my marbles, I think.
I can still compile "hello world", but I'm getting link errors if I call
math or file functions (basic stuff like sqrt, fprintf). They've been
available so long through the default library path that I don't know where
to find them. How do I restore this?
How embarrassi
Hi.
I'm trying to build wxwindows apps for windows from debian and I'm
having problems linking with the wxwindows libraries. I'm using the
wxwindows cvs source,after installing the libraies in
/usr/local/i586-mingw32msvc/lib/ I have:
libwx_base-2.5-i586-mingw32msvc.a
libwx_ba
presume it needs an
a.out version of libvga.so.1. Does anyone know where I can get old
libraries like this?
--
Joel Konkle-Parker
Webmaster [Ballsome.com]
Phone [+1 662-518-1636]
E-mail[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 29 September 2003 05:57 pm, Victor Cain wrote:
> I'm running Debian SID and normally update packages daily. The last update
> removed ten perl libraries and about 90 other packages dependent on them.
>
> I have two questions: Is there any thing I can do to fix this, or
I'm running Debian SID and normally update packages daily. The last update
removed ten perl libraries and about 90 other packages dependent on them.
I have two questions: Is there any thing I can do to fix this, or is it
something that I just have to wait for? Second, if this is a
ack and blas/atlas. I was kinda
> > expecting this in install Fortran libraries with
> names
> > like liblapack.a that I could just link to at
> compile
> > time, but I don't, only lapack.so and lapack.so.2
> > (maybe they have a 'lib' in front, I forg
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:54:15 +0100, Simon Tod wrote:
> I was kinda expecting this in install Fortran libraries with names like
> liblapack.a
.a files are static libraries.
> that I could just link to at compile time, but I don't, only
> lapack.so and lapack.so.2 (maybe the
The quickest way to build a library of all the Fortran
codes available in LAPACK appeared to be just by
apt-get-ing lapack and blas/atlas. I was kinda
expecting this in install Fortran libraries with names
like liblapack.a that I could just link to at compile
time, but I don't, only lapack.s
so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40016000)
I needed to install packages xlib6 and xpm4.7, each of which has libraries
compiled against libc5. My old app now works again. (Yes, it _is_
Wordperfect 8; I didn't want to start the old argument about it!)
Patrick
--
Patrick Wiseman
ved symbols. The unfound libraries exist in
/usr/X11R6/lib, which is in /etc/ld.so.conf. The executable is almost
certainly an a.out (is there a way to tell?), while the libraries are
presumably ELF (I'm on a 'testing' box). Is there anything to be done?
Patrick
--
Patrick Wise
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:03:23PM -0400, David Meiser wrote:
> Mark C wrote:
> >On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 20:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin/netscape-installer# ./netscape-installer
> >>./netscape-installer-bin: error while loading sha
On Sun, 08 Jun 2003 00:42:00 -0400
Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> >
> How do I go about keeping my current gtk stuff around, and install
> the gtk2.0 as well?
> >>>
> >>>If you compiled i
In 'n bericht van 7 Jun 2003 schreef je:
> I want to install, not upgrade to gtk2.0.
>
> How do I go about keeping my current gtk stuff around, and install the
> gtk2.0 as well?
Put any package you want to keep installed under all circumstances on hold,
in dselect, or by doing
echo hold | dpkg
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
How do I go about keeping my current gtk stuff around, and install
the gtk2.0 as well?
If you compiled it yourself, you should keep your self-compiled
version in /opt...
Unfortunately, all by way of apt-get
So w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > > How do I go about keeping my current gtk stuff around, and install
> > > the gtk2.0 as well?
> >
> > If you compiled it yourself, you should keep your self-compiled
> > version in
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 02:38:38 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:48:05PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > How do I go about keeping my current gtk stuff around, and install
> > the gtk2.0 as well?
>
> If you compiled it yourself, you should keep your self-co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:48:05PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> How do I go about keeping my current gtk stuff around, and install the
> gtk2.0 as well?
If you compiled it yourself, you should keep your self-compiled
version in /opt...
- --
.''`
I want to install, not upgrade to gtk2.0.
How do I go about keeping my current gtk stuff around, and install the
gtk2.0 as well?
Thanks
--
Rodney D. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Registered Linux User #96112
ICQ#: AIM#: YAHOO:
18002350 mailman452 mailman42_5
They that can give up e
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 03:32, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Just upgraded my packages for Xwindows to unstable and downgraded them
> again. Gnome 1.4 started fine with Startx.
>
> Gnome 2.2 gives me:
>
> error while loading shared libraries: libXmuu.so.1:
> when I
Hi List
Just upgraded my packages for Xwindows to unstable and downgraded them
again. Gnome 1.4 started fine with Startx.
Gnome 2.2 gives me:
error while loading shared libraries: libXmuu.so.1:
when I do startx
~/.xsession-errors tells me:
xrdb: error while loading shared libraries
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:54:15PM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
> I have installed the following packages:
>
> libwxgtk-2.2
> libwxgtk-2.4
> libwxgtk-2.4-devel
> wxwin2.4-doc
> wxwin2.4-examples
> wxwin2.4-headers
> wxwin2.4-il8n
>
> But when I go to compile my wxWindows code which has previously
Hello.
I have installed the following packages:
libwxgtk-2.2
libwxgtk-2.4
libwxgtk-2.4-devel
wxwin2.4-doc
wxwin2.4-examples
wxwin2.4-headers
wxwin2.4-il8n
But when I go to compile my wxWindows code which has previously worked
with a manually installed wxWindows, I get an error about a missing
w
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 09:53:58PM +0100, Peppe wrote:
> Hi,
> I have problems with the QT libraries:
>
> But
> 1) gcc doesn't compile ANY qt-based program, like even tutorials O_O
> 2) the binary compiled on another system doesn't start...
Are you using qmake? Or yo
Hi,
I have problems with the QT libraries:
I need to use a QT-based toolset built by some friends.
It is build for qt3-mt and I got these packages:
ii libqt3 3.0.3-20020329 Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii libqt3-dev 3.0.3-20020329 Qt GUI development files
ii libqt3-mt
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:20:05PM -0800, nate wrote:
> Thomas H. George,,, said:
> > I can't use make menuconfig to build a kernel as the setup fails with a
> > message that ncurses can't find libraries. I have verified that
> > ncurses-bin, ncurses-base, n
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas H George,,, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> I can't use make menuconfig to build a kernel as the setup fails
Thomas> with a message that ncurses can't find libraries. I have
Thomas> verified that ncurses-bin, ncur
Thomas H. George,,, said:
> I can't use make menuconfig to build a kernel as the setup fails with a
> message that ncurses can't find libraries. I have verified that
> ncurses-bin, ncurses-base, ncurses-term and libncurses5 are installed and
> have even reinstalled th
I can't use make menuconfig to build a kernel as the setup fails with a
message that ncurses can't find libraries. I have verified that
ncurses-bin, ncurses-base, ncurses-term and libncurses5 are installed
and have even reinstalled them without solving the problem.
Fortunately, ma
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:15:11PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> In order to get a bug fixed, I'm doing an upgrade. Dependencies on
> dependencies on dependencies have started to pull in a bunch of the *c102
> transition libraries...
Use aptitude or apt or whatever to just i
In order to get a bug fixed, I'm doing an upgrade. Dependencies on
dependencies on dependencies have started to pull in a bunch of the *c102
transition libraries...
...which conflict with most everything installed on the system (by design)...
...such as all of KDE:
/usr/bin/apt-get
s, including the lack
of module support and the fact that it doesn't need to be careful with
hardware).
Preloading is about hard-wiring addresses of shared library symbols in
executables. It does give some speedup for programs using a lot of
shared libraries (e.g. Gnome applications) but sh
Noah L. Meyerhans said:
> I'm surprised there isn't anything on the web about this. I just
> searched google and altavista (remember them?) but came up with nothing.
>
> In any case, loading shared libraries is slow. Compiling everything
> statically would be much fa
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:57:27PM -0800, nate wrote:
> running a couple google searches I can't find anything useful, I
> was wondering if anyone could explain what the advantage is to
> preloading libraries on a linux system.
I'm surprised there isn't anything on the
running a couple google searches I can't find anything useful, I
was wondering if anyone could explain what the advantage is to
preloading libraries on a linux system.
my grandparents sent me their ThinkNIC, which I am doing some mods
to, and was looking at the init scripts and saw
TECTED]
> Subject: libraries problems
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:45:51 +0100
> X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/245278
>
> Hi erverbody!!
>
> I upgraded my system (debian unstable). apt-get update - apt-get upgrade .
> Everything worked. But when i
Hi erverbody!!
I upgraded my system (debian unstable). apt-get update - apt-get upgrade .
Everything worked. But when i tried to make a apt-get [foobar] or a apt-cache
[foobar], tried to start kmail or mozilla, this message comes.
apt-get: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc
se of
> the improved support for the sablotron libraries.
>
> I'm trying to figure out what the best approach is:
>
> 1) Take out all php packages, and compile php 4.2.3 from source
> 2) use just the php4-xslt module from sid
> 3) use all of the php4 modules from sid
Hi folks,
I need a suggestion. I've got a box running testing, which has the
php version 4.1.2. Just about everything with that is OK - except for
the xslt support. I *need* the xslt module of version 4.2.3, because
of the improved support for the sablotron libraries.
I'm trying to
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:09:55AM -0400, Chip Rose wrote:
>
>
> However, nothing else with .php, .php4, .php3 works at all. They fail with
> various errors, one of which is the following:
> Fatal error: Failed opening required './libraries/grab_globals.lib.php'
>
I still can't get get PHP working - Apache and MySQL work fine, but loading
PHP pages continually show errors such as:
Fatal error: Failed opening required './libraries/grab_globals.lib.php'
I reinstalled everything via deb files - phpmyadmin, apache, and php4, and
uncommen
wizard. Then I go to
the linker options and write "-lpthread" in the additional libraries field as
described in the KDevelop user manual, section 9.4. After this I get a lot of
messages (see below) when i compile the project. The programm starts but
without any changes. It seems that it wo
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:43:11PM -0700, Craig Maloney wrote:
> > my first thought was that the .2 was g++ 2.95, .2.3 was g++ 3.0, and
> > .2.3.1 was g++ 3.1.
>
> Look more carefully and you'll see that three of those are just symlinks
> to the fourth.
Doh!... my bad.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:43:11PM -0700, Craig Maloney wrote:
> Is there a standard way in debian to determine which version of g++ a
> c++ shared library was compiled with?
The easiest way I know of is to find the version of libstdc++ it's
linked to using 'ldd', map that filename back to the p
Hi all.
Is there a standard way in debian to determine which version of g++ a
c++ shared library was compiled with?
Does anyone know how to determine this by just looking at the object files?
In particular, I'm trying to compile some qt examples:
-
$ dpkg --search libqt.so
libq
I've installed the debugging libraries libc6-dbg 2.2.5-6 and
libstdc++2.10-dbg.
I'm trying to debug a perl module that calls aspell's c++ library. But gdb
isn't showing me what I need to know. Are there source packages I need to
install, too?
(gdb) s
217 in
/home/doko
fo when tracing into system libraries with gdb. I'm
running woody.
Here's the problem in a nutshell:
The module works on some platforms and on others it doesn't, and I've
installed everything from source, except the system libraries (and gdb is a
deb).
Normally:
My perl
Nicholls
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: documentation of libraries
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Rohan Nicholls wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have a happily running debian distribution, but am getting very
> confused when trying to install certain software as
201 - 300 of 529 matches
Mail list logo
