Re: LibreOffice 3.3 Release Candidate 2

2011-01-09 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-01-09 19:25 +0100, Ken Heard wrote: > Sven Joachim wrote: >> On 2011-01-09 17:01 +0100, Ken Heard wrote: > >>> Is it however now sufficiently stable to use instead of OpenOffice.org, >>> or should I wait until it becomes an official debian package? >> >> There are already official Debian

Re: LibreOffice 3.3 Release Candidate 2

2011-01-09 Thread Ken Heard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2011-01-09 17:01 +0100, Ken Heard wrote: >> Is it however now sufficiently stable to use instead of OpenOffice.org, >> or should I wait until it becomes an official debian package? > > There are already official Debian packag

Re: LibreOffice 3.3 Release Candidate 2

2011-01-09 Thread shawn wilson
On Jan 9, 2011 12:15 PM, "Sven Joachim" wrote: > > On 2011-01-09 17:01 +0100, Ken Heard wrote: > > > I note that this version of LibreOffice is now available as a debian > > package in several languages from http://www.libreoffice.org/download/. > > I think I am correct in assuming that it is not

Re: LibreOffice 3.3 Release Candidate 2

2011-01-09 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-01-09 17:01 +0100, Ken Heard wrote: > I note that this version of LibreOffice is now available as a debian > package in several languages from http://www.libreoffice.org/download/. > I think I am correct in assuming that it is not an "official" debian > package. > > Is it however now suffi

LibreOffice 3.3 Release Candidate 2

2011-01-09 Thread Ken Heard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I note that this version of LibreOffice is now available as a debian package in several languages from http://www.libreoffice.org/download/. I think I am correct in assuming that it is not an "official" debian package. Is it however now sufficiently s