On 2011-01-09 19:25 +0100, Ken Heard wrote:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2011-01-09 17:01 +0100, Ken Heard wrote:
>
>>> Is it however now sufficiently stable to use instead of OpenOffice.org,
>>> or should I wait until it becomes an official debian package?
>>
>> There are already official Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-01-09 17:01 +0100, Ken Heard wrote:
>> Is it however now sufficiently stable to use instead of OpenOffice.org,
>> or should I wait until it becomes an official debian package?
>
> There are already official Debian packag
On Jan 9, 2011 12:15 PM, "Sven Joachim" wrote:
>
> On 2011-01-09 17:01 +0100, Ken Heard wrote:
>
> > I note that this version of LibreOffice is now available as a debian
> > package in several languages from http://www.libreoffice.org/download/.
> > I think I am correct in assuming that it is not
On 2011-01-09 17:01 +0100, Ken Heard wrote:
> I note that this version of LibreOffice is now available as a debian
> package in several languages from http://www.libreoffice.org/download/.
> I think I am correct in assuming that it is not an "official" debian
> package.
>
> Is it however now suffi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I note that this version of LibreOffice is now available as a debian
package in several languages from http://www.libreoffice.org/download/.
I think I am correct in assuming that it is not an "official" debian
package.
Is it however now sufficiently s
5 matches
Mail list logo