Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-05 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:36:33AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 02 Jul 2008, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > On 02 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry, I hadn't read the e2label line properly. But I don't t

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 02 Jul 2008, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 02 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > > > Sorry, I hadn't read the e2label line properly. But I don't think it > > > would affect the issue I encountered here, which was a change

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 02 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > Sorry, I hadn't read the e2label line properly. But I don't think it > > would affect the issue I encountered here, which was a change in the > > actual partition referred to. The label

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 02 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 09:09:00AM +0100, Wackojacko wrote: > > > I think you should be asking yourself how the old kernel boots with hdb9. > > Grub numbering system starts from 0 so hd(0,0) is hda1 and hda(1,9) is > > hdb10 etc. Are you sure you don't h

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 09:09:00AM +0100, Wackojacko wrote: > I think you should be asking yourself how the old kernel boots with hdb9. > Grub numbering system starts from 0 so hd(0,0) is hda1 and hda(1,9) is > hdb10 etc. Are you sure you don't have another debian/linux install on > hdb9 :).

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:37:19AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:40:12PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > > and did you use a vga= parm? And did that work? > > $ dmesg | grep vga\=791 > [0.00] Kernel command line: root=LABEL=sid ro vga=791 > > $ uname -a > L

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > Sorry, I hadn't read the e2label line properly. But I don't think it > would affect the issue I encountered here, which was a change in the > actual partition referred to. The label would still be referring to > the wrong partiti

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Wackojacko
Anthony Campbell wrote: On 02 Jul 2008, Bob Cox wrote: On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 07:51:20 +0100, Anthony Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I don't understand label in this context. Where is it set? This was explained by Florian Kulzer earlier in this thread. (It was such a good explanation

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 02 Jul 2008, Bob Cox wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 07:51:20 +0100, Anthony Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > > I don't understand label in this context. Where is it set? > > This was explained by Florian Kulzer earlier in this thread. (It was > such a good explanation I kept it

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:40:12PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > and did you use a vga= parm? And did that work? $ dmesg | grep vga\=791 [0.00] Kernel command line: root=LABEL=sid ro vga=791 $ uname -a Linux think 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Jun 12 16:26:30 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Regard

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-02 Thread Bob Cox
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 07:51:20 +0100, Anthony Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I don't understand label in this context. Where is it set? This was explained by Florian Kulzer earlier in this thread. (It was such a good explanation I kept it for future reference!) On Mon, Jun 30, 2008

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-01 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 01 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:02:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > Well, I finally found the answer but it's very odd. I don't think it > > should work but it does. I put the "wrong" root entry in > > /boot/grub/menu.lst. All previous kernels have had

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-01 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:02:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > Well, I finally found the answer but it's very odd. I don't think it > should work but it does. I put the "wrong" root entry in > /boot/grub/menu.lst. All previous kernels have had /dev/hdb9 but this > kernel seems to need /dev/h

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-01 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 01 Jul 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Anthony Campbell wrote: >> On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:28:10PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: >>> > Uh-oh, speaking of initrds: I forgot that in my previous message; you > should probably rebuild it if you cha

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-01 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Anthony Campbell wrote: On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:28:10PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: Uh-oh, speaking of initrds: I forgot that in my previous message; you should probably rebuild it if you change your fstab to labels or UUIDs. How do you do that? I c

Re: Linux-image-2.6.25 won't boot - target filesystem error -SOLVED

2008-07-01 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 30 Jun 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:28:10PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > > Uh-oh, speaking of initrds: I forgot that in my previous message; you > > > should probably rebuild it if you change your fstab to labels or UUIDs. > > > > How do you do that? I chang