Sven - who is desparate to run 2.4.0
#
# Multi-device support (RAID and LVM)
#
CONFIG_MD=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD is not set
# CONFIG_MD_LINEAR is not set
# CONFIG_MD_RAID0 is not set
# CONFIG_MD_RAID1 is not set
# CONFIG_MD_RAID5 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LVM=y
CONFIG_LVM_PROC_FS=y
try to leave
This guy is in deep trouble guys, try helping him out ...
Apperently i couldn't help him
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Cheong Shu Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:12 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.0 root fs problem
On Thu
ยป Joris Lambrecht said this and I say that:
This guy is in deep trouble guys, try helping him out ...
Apperently i couldn't help him
Count me in this trouble too. My guess is that it's something
about modules - I compiled two 2.4 test12 kernels - one of them had
_almost_ everything
Hello
After having built and installed my custom linux-2.4.0-deb, I get the
following when booting:
[boot msgs]
VFS: Cannot open root device 803 or 08:03
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:03
After which booting halts.
$ rdev
Just to clarify:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
$ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.18
Root device /dev/sda3
(Booting with 2.2.18 works)
$ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.0
Root device /dev/sda3
... but not with 2.4.0.
Thanks in advance!
Sven
Sven Burgener [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just to clarify:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
$ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.18
Root device /dev/sda3
(Booting with 2.2.18 works)
$ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.0
Root device /dev/sda3
... but not with 2.4.0.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
VFS: Cannot open root device 803 or 08:03
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:03
Did you remember to say 'yes' *not* 'module' for ext2 support in the kernel
(under General
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:07:00PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
Sven Burgener [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just to clarify:
$ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.18
Root device /dev/sda3
(Booting with 2.2.18 works)
$ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.0
Root device /dev/sda3
... but not with 2.4.0.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Bob Billson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
VFS: Cannot open root device 803 or 08:03
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:03
Did you remember to say
Sven Burgener [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Bob Billson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
VFS: Cannot open root device 803 or 08:03
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount
I simply used the configurations for my 2.2.18 kernel and then did a
make oldconfig.
So, yes, I did select ext2 support built-in, as I did in 2.2.18.
I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
install Linux without ext2 support?
I have always wondered why the
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:36:54PM +, Pollywog wrote:
I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
install Linux without ext2 support?
I have always wondered why the option was given.
In a word: choice. Before ext2 there was the original ext. Or was it
called
To quote Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED],
# I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
# install Linux without ext2 support?
# I have always wondered why the option was given.
A number of reasons;
Embedded applications: typical embedded applications are *extremely*
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 01:19:41PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
Well, it's a pain but I'd go through the config the old-fashioned way,
eg.:
make clean
make-kpkg clean
make distclean
make (xconfig|config|menuconfig)
make-kpkg whatever
Something
Pollywog == Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I simply used the configurations for my 2.2.18 kernel and
then did a make oldconfig. So, yes, I did select ext2
support built-in, as I did in 2.2.18.
Pollywog I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:42:02PM -0500, David B. Harris wrote:
To quote Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED],
# I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
# install Linux without ext2 support?
# I have always wondered why the option was given.
ReiserFS/ext3: Some people run
16 matches
Mail list logo
