Hi.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 05:49:44AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> >> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server
> >> Got some idea ?
> >
> > Your MTA signs these headers:
> >
> > Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Cc:References:To:From:Sub
Hi,
On 2021-07-10 3:46 a.m., Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've wrote a message regarding my MTA.
>>
>> I was thinking it's corrected but...
>>
>> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server
>> Got
Hi.
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
> I've wrote a message regarding my MTA.
>
> I was thinking it's corrected but...
>
> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server
> Got some idea ?
Your MTA signs these headers:
Content-T
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:43:56PM +0300, Kevin N. wrote:
> Not sure if that is the case here, but sometimes mailing list
> software alters the original message headers which then can lead to
> failed DKIM signature checks.
Most probably. This is a known problem. DKIM is (roughly speaking) a
signa
Not sure if that is the case here, but sometimes mailing list software
alters the original message headers which then can lead to failed DKIM
signature checks.
Cheers,
K.
Hi,
I've wrote a message regarding my MTA.
I was thinking it's corrected but...
Here what I got from the Debian maili
Hi,
I've wrote a message regarding my MTA.
I was thinking it's corrected but...
Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server
Got some idea ?
--
This is a spf/dkim authentication-failure report for an email message
received
from IP 82.195.75.100 on Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:12:17 +0200.
6 matches
Mail list logo