Re: MTA (DMARC)

2021-07-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 05:49:44AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > >> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server > >> Got some idea ? > > > > Your MTA signs these headers: > > > > Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Cc:References:To:From:Sub

Re: MTA (DMARC)

2021-07-10 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
Hi, On 2021-07-10 3:46 a.m., Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > wrote: >> Hi, >> I've wrote a message regarding my MTA. >> >> I was thinking it's corrected but... >> >> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server >> Got

Re: MTA (DMARC)

2021-07-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi, > I've wrote a message regarding my MTA. > > I was thinking it's corrected but... > > Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server > Got some idea ? Your MTA signs these headers: Content-T

Re: MTA (DMARC)

2021-07-10 Thread tomas
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:43:56PM +0300, Kevin N. wrote: > Not sure if that is the case here, but sometimes mailing list > software alters the original message headers which then can lead to > failed DKIM signature checks. Most probably. This is a known problem. DKIM is (roughly speaking) a signa

Re: MTA (DMARC)

2021-07-09 Thread Kevin N.
Not sure if that is the case here, but sometimes mailing list software alters the original message headers which then can lead to failed DKIM signature checks. Cheers, K. Hi, I've wrote a message regarding my MTA. I was thinking it's corrected but... Here what I got from the Debian maili

MTA (DMARC)

2021-07-09 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
Hi, I've wrote a message regarding my MTA. I was thinking it's corrected but... Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server Got some idea ? -- This is a spf/dkim authentication-failure report for an email message received from IP 82.195.75.100 on Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:12:17 +0200.