On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:47:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:35:29AM -0900, jerry wrote:
> > I should also mention, if mutt still complains about the
> > files as not being a mailbox, you will have to delete and
> > recreate them. As I mentioned earlier, I had thi
>
> I've gotten hold of the drill; echo>usernamebox; ae usernamebox. (The latter
> is for removing the final white-space; when Mutt works, I'll get to vi or
> emacs. They both scare me)
>
> I think it's in the headers that procmail/fetchmail delivers. I'll
> experiment on it and make sure to
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:35:29AM -0900, jerry wrote:
> >
> > Are you sure? SCHADUW=${MAILDIR}/schaduw does say it's in
> > /home/snotty/Mail/schaduw??
> >
> No, not sure what you are using for a referance.
That's ok then; you had me there
> >
> I should also mention, if mutt still complain
>
> Are you sure? SCHADUW=${MAILDIR}/schaduw does say it's in
> /home/snotty/Mail/schaduw??
>
No, not sure what you are using for a referance.
> Almost there
>
> Thanks again!
> Frans
>
>
>
I should also mention, if mutt still complains about the files as
not being a mailbox, you will have
> > > mda '/usr/bin/procmail'
> > >
> >
> > I also had the mda line as well in my .muttrc, I think this may have
> > been the culprit causing the error with the mailbox not being recognized
> > as being a mailbox, don't know for sure, but it's not commented out
> > and seems to work fine.
>
> N
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:11:06PM +0100, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
[...]
> >However able to get the mail delivered where I want to, Mutt
> >complains that the destination box (spoolfile) is not a mail
> >box. I don't have a clue as to where I must look.
>
> This was snipped from your .muttrc
>
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:08:27AM -0900, jerry wrote:
> > However able to get the mail delivered where I want to, Mutt complains that
> > the destination box (spoolfile) is not a mail box.
> > I don't have a clue as to where I must look. The documentation of
> > procmail/mutt requires expert-ins
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 01:59:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> However able to get the mail delivered where I want to, Mutt complains that
> the destination box (spoolfile) is not a mail box.
> I don't have a clue as to where I must look. The documentation of
> procmail/mutt requires
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been attempting to get my Mutt going but it's giving me a
hard time I've included .procmailrc .muttrc .forward
.fetchmailrc . If there's more, please let me know
[...]
However able to get the mail delivered where I want to, Mutt
complains that
Hai all,
I've been attempting to get my Mutt going but it's giving me a hard time
I've included .procmailrc .muttrc .forward .fetchmailrc . If there's more,
please let me know
Did not include /etc/Muttrc as it is the default.
Using Debian-woody; I do not use exim, trying to use ssmtp and procmai
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:01:10PM -0500, Chris Hilts wrote:
| On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:57:53AM +0100, R. Pac wrote:
| > By the way how may I configure Mutt to take mail directly from a pop
| > server without using fetchmail ?
|
| You don't. The closest you can come to this is probably IMAP,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:57:53AM +0100, R. Pac wrote:
> I would like to know which software are better to use with Mutt.
Depends on your needs.
> By the way how may I configure Mutt to take mail directly from a pop
> server without using fetchmail ?
You don't. The closest you can come to this
Hello,
I would like to know which software are better to use with Mutt.
Exim with Procmail and Fetchmail
or another configuration ?
By the way how may I configure Mutt to take mail directly from a pop
server without using fetchmail ?
Thanks
Best regards
Pac
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:48:29PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
| On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:48:00PM +0530, Jijo Jose A wrote:
...
| 'mutt -f my_mbox ', my_mbox is not a mailbox
...
| > how can i solve this ?
...
| then fix your procmail action accordingly.
Once the mailbox is fixed, I recommend
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:48:00PM +0530, Jijo Jose A wrote:
> hi all
> still i used procmail 3.21.20010831.3.22pre-1 for mail processing and mutt
> 1.3.22-1 as MUA, to remove the unwanted headers i wrote '|cat | formail -k -X
> From:
> -X Return-Path: -X Date:.. >>my_mbox' in .procmailrc as t
hi all
still i used procmail 3.21.20010831.3.22pre-1 for mail processing and mutt
1.3.22-1 as MUA, to remove the unwanted headers i wrote '|cat | formail -k -X
From:
-X Return-Path: -X Date:.. >>my_mbox' in .procmailrc as the action line
for a condition. but i started 'mutt -f my_mbox ', my_m
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 01:50:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> # debian user mailing list
> :0:
> * ^X-Mailing-List:
> debian-user
If you subscribe to more than a few debian lists, try this:
:0
* ^X-Mailing-List: .*[<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
* ^X-Mailing-List: .*[<] *\/[^ [EMAIL PROTECTE
At Fri, 20 Apr 2001 12:50:48 -0700 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Install procmail and put this recipe in ~/.procmailrc ... it should do the
>job...
>
># debian user mailing list
>:0:
>* ^X-Mailing-List:
>
Oops, again ... there should be a name of a file to place the matched e-mail
in, like ...
At Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:10:04 -0300 , Mike G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just subscribed to the list, I'd really need some help for
>separating mail from lists, as you might easily guess.
Install procmail and put this recipe in ~/.procmailrc ... it should do the
job...
# debian user mailing l
> I just subscribed to the list, I'd really need some help for
> separating mail from lists, as you might easily guess.
> This is my cfg: mutt/exim/potato
> Any help (and receipe better yet!) will be higly appreciated
Have a look at
www.procmail.org
and in particular (the ones that made it click
Hi,
I just subscribed to the list, I'd really need some help for
separating mail from lists, as you might easily guess.
This is my cfg: mutt/exim/potato
Any help (and receipe better yet!) will be higly appreciated
Thanks!
On 2000-10-04 16:25:50, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:06:59PM -0400, Joel Dinel wrote:
> > I store all mails from this list in ~/Mail/IN.debian-user. How can I go
> > read those mails in Mutt ? I can't see anything in the man pages...
>
> mutt -f ~/Mail/IN.debian-user
>
> or
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:06:59PM -0400, Joel Dinel wrote:
> I store all mails from this list in ~/Mail/IN.debian-user. How can I go read
> those mails in Mutt ? I can't see anything in the man pages...
mutt -f ~/Mail/IN.debian-user
or when in mutt hit `c' then =IN.debian-user ENTER
or if you
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:06:59PM -0400, Joel Dinel wrote:
> I store all mails from this list in ~/Mail/IN.debian-user. How can I go read
> those mails in Mutt ? I can't see anything in the man pages...
man mutt will tell you that you can either:
start mutt as
mutt -f ~/Mail/IN.debian-user
I store all mails from this list in ~/Mail/IN.debian-user. How can I go read
those mails in Mutt ? I can't see anything in the man pages...
Thanks !
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:02:01PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote:
> Okay,
> I started using procmail to filter mail into various places
> under ~/Mail. If all the filters are passed, mail gets put into
> ~/Mail/inbox. In my muttrc file, I specified all the places where new
> mail arrives. H
Okay,
I started using procmail to filter mail into various places
under ~/Mail. If all the filters are passed, mail gets put into
~/Mail/inbox. In my muttrc file, I specified all the places where new
mail arrives. However, mutt never recognizes there's new mail in
~/Mail/inbox, although
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 16:47:38 -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> I can view pdf attachments from mutt if they have mime headers like
>
> Content-Type: application/pdf; name="file.pdf"
>
> However I get quite a few emails with
>
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream
>
> Does anyone have a reli
I can view pdf attachments from mutt if they have mime headers like
Content-Type: application/pdf; name="file.pdf"
However I get quite a few emails with
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Does anyone have a reliable way for modifying the Content-Type and
changing octet-stream to a useable
Quoting Wojciech Zabolotny ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I just wanted to configure procmail in my system, and I'm a little afraid
> of locking problems. How should I configure the locking in procmail and
> in mutt, to avoid the destruction of mail folders when procmail delivers
> a message to the fold
Hi All,
I just wanted to configure procmail in my system, and I'm a little afraid
of locking problems. How should I configure the locking in procmail and
in mutt, to avoid the destruction of mail folders when procmail delivers
a message to the folder which is currently beeing modified by mutt.
Is
31 matches
Mail list logo
