On Tue 07 Jan 2014 at 20:58:06 +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 07/01/2014 20:55, Brian a écrit :
> >>
> > How do you know it is postfix? There is nothing here which indictes it.
> > Is it because you know you have postfix installed so that is why you say
> > "looks like postfix".?
> >
> > A misconf
Hi Martin,
> Akonadi also handles POP3 and IMAP access as well as SMTP.
>
> If its running and accounts are configured to check for mail every x minutes
> Akonadi will do just that in the background.
that is, how it is configured here. So the reason is truely akonadi!
I had already akonadi in sus
Am Dienstag, 7. Januar 2014, 19:36:24 schrieb Hans-J. Ullrich:
> > However a MUA won't download emails from a MTA, but from a POP or IMAP
> > server.
>
> Yes, of course from the pop3 server of my provider.
>
> > What makes you think they were "downloaded".
>
> I think, they were downloaded, for
Erwan David wrote:
Le 07/01/2014 20:55, Brian a écrit :
On Tue 07 Jan 2014 at 19:58:31 +0100, Hans wrote:
Hi Erwan,
As root do /usr/sbin/lsof -i:25
You'll see what smtp server is on.
Note that a smtp server is needed by several basic Unix utilities (like
cron).
Hmm, looks like postfix.
lsof
> master is the name of the main postfix process. But note that having a
> MTA running won't get emails from the provider pop3 server...
Exactly! Master pointed me to postfix. But this does not explain, why I got the
mails from the pop3 server.
I changed now postfix, so I get
lsof -i:25
COMMAN
Le 07/01/2014 20:55, Brian a écrit :
> On Tue 07 Jan 2014 at 19:58:31 +0100, Hans wrote:
>
>> Hi Erwan,
>>> As root do /usr/sbin/lsof -i:25
>>> You'll see what smtp server is on.
>>>
>>> Note that a smtp server is needed by several basic Unix utilities (like
>>> cron).
>> Hmm, looks like postfix.
On Tue 07 Jan 2014 at 19:58:31 +0100, Hans wrote:
> Hi Erwan,
> > As root do /usr/sbin/lsof -i:25
> > You'll see what smtp server is on.
> >
> > Note that a smtp server is needed by several basic Unix utilities (like
> > cron).
>
> Hmm, looks like postfix.
> lsof -i:25
> COMMAND PID USER FD
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:58:31 +0100 Hans napísal:
> Hmm, looks like postfix.
> lsof -i:25
> COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
> master 10288 root 12u IPv4 15076 0t0 TCP *:smtp (LISTEN)
try this (as root):
netstat -tnlp | grep 25
tcp0 0 127.
Hi Erwan,
> As root do /usr/sbin/lsof -i:25
> You'll see what smtp server is on.
>
> Note that a smtp server is needed by several basic Unix utilities (like
> cron).
Hmm, looks like postfix.
lsof -i:25
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
master 10288 root 12u IPv4 15076
Le 07/01/2014 19:40, Hans a écrit :
> Hi Miles,
>> What Erwan said. Sounds more like SMTP mail being processed by your
>> MTA, with local delivery.
>>
> Yes, I believe, there is an MTA running, and yes, it is smtp, but which one?
> Is it postfix? Postfix is configured as "local". Exim is NOT inst
Hi Miles,
> What Erwan said. Sounds more like SMTP mail being processed by your
> MTA, with local delivery.
>
Yes, I believe, there is an MTA running, and yes, it is smtp, but which one?
Is it postfix? Postfix is configured as "local". Exim is NOT installed. Do not
know, if procmail is involve
> However a MUA won't download emails from a MTA, but from a POP or IMAP
> server.
Yes, of course from the pop3 server of my provider.
>
> What makes you think they were "downloaded".
>
I think, they were downloaded, for two reasons. First, they are already there,
when I start my MUA. Second,
Erwan David wrote:
Le 07/01/2014 19:10, Brian a écrit :
On Tue 07 Jan 2014 at 18:33:06 +0100, Hans wrote:
I am wondering, why debian has already downloaded, although I got no MUA
started. When I start kmail, all mails are already downloaded.
Do you have any clue, where I can look, and which M
Le 07/01/2014 19:10, Brian a écrit :
> On Tue 07 Jan 2014 at 18:33:06 +0100, Hans wrote:
>
>> I am wondering, why debian has already downloaded, although I got no MUA
>> started. When I start kmail, all mails are already downloaded.
>>
>> Do you have any clue, where I can look, and which MTA migh
On Tue 07 Jan 2014 at 18:33:06 +0100, Hans wrote:
> I am wondering, why debian has already downloaded, although I got no MUA
> started. When I start kmail, all mails are already downloaded.
>
> Do you have any clue, where I can look, and which MTA might be resp0onsible
> for it? I suspected po
Hi folks,
I am wondering, why debian has already downloaded, although I got no MUA
started. When I start kmail, all mails are already downloaded.
Do you have any clue, where I can look, and which MTA might be resp0onsible
for it? I suspected postfix, but it looks like there is another MTA runn
16 matches
Mail list logo
