Hi Jon,
> Far worse: I have a 1TB external drive with a DOS partition table, one
> partition formatted for LVM, with an LVM logical volume on top which is
> part of an md RAID set, inside the RAID device is another LVM PV for a
> different volume group. Your point is correct: it is far from
> user
(Incidentally is your first name 'Jetse'?)
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 07:37:31PM +0200, J.A. de Vries wrote:
> Ever tried to put a fully encrypted disk with LVM in another machine, without
> booting from it?
Far worse: I have a 1TB external drive with a DOS partition table, one partition
formatted
Hi Jon,
> The system on which you might want to read the disk will need to know
> how to decrypt it. Do you anticipate hot-plugging it to a running
> machine, or trying to boot from it?
In this situation I will have a disk which is used to boot one machine, but
does contain data that will be ne
On 01/04/12 08:27, J.A. de Vries wrote:
> This time I need my disk to be easily portable, so I prefer to have a
> fully encrypted disk without LVM
The system on which you might want to read the disk will need to know
how to decrypt it. Do you anticipate hot-plugging it to a running
machine, or tr
If you only encrypt the disk, the default (at least on the squeeze
netinstall disk) is to create a large ext3 partition. Then you don't
have an lvm partition...
--b
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:27 AM, J.A. de Vries wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I plan on installing testing on a brand new disk later this week
Hi all,
I plan on installing testing on a brand new disk later this week. Last time I
did this I just followed the options the installer offered and ended up with a
perfectly fine system on a fully encrypted disk using LVM.
This time I need my disk to be easily portable, so I prefer to have a f
6 matches
Mail list logo
