On 2024-04-18 at 11:53, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 18/04/2024 12:43, Hans wrote:
>
>> But the "Sorry" mail I did send without the spam tag. However, I
>> get it WITH the spamtag, as all mails get the DCIM=false tag in the
>> header (created by the debian servers) and megamailservers.eu add
On 18/04/2024 12:43, Hans wrote:
But the "Sorry" mail I did send without the spam tag. However, I get it WITH
the spamtag, as all mails get the DCIM=false tag in the header (created by the
debian servers) and megamailservers.eu add the SPAM tag.
Or you could use a less shitty mail
-
> From: "Nicolas George"
> To: "debian-user"
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 11:13:44 AM
> Subject: Re: *SPAM* Marking as spam [was: *SPAM* Re:
> LibreOffice removed from Debian]
> Hans (12024-04-18):
> > As I can not fix it
>
&g
rtnetz...@windstream.net (12024-04-18):
> As I understand what he wrote, the SPAM tag is added after the message leaves
> his control.
I very much doubt it, we would see “*SPAM* Re:” rather than
“Re: *SPAM*”.
And his recent “Sorry” mail was not tagged.
As I understand what he wrote, the SPAM tag is added after the message leaves
his control.
- Original Message -
From: "Nicolas George"
To: "debian-user"
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 11:13:44 AM
Subject: Re: *****SPAM* Marking as spam [was: *SPAM* Re:
Hans (12024-04-18):
> As I can not fix it
You can manually remove “*SPAM*” from the mail when you reply.
You could even automate it on your end.
--
Nicolas George
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2024, 11:53:38 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
Hi Tomas,
this is by debian servers, I talked about this for a while. Because the debian
servers mark some things in the header, megamailservers.eu mark them as spam
and add SPAM to the headline.
As I can not fix it
Hi, Hans
is it your mail setup adding that *SPAM* decoration to the
subject?
Just curious...
cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2/24/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Interestingly, there is no two-line instruction on your mail.
I've noticed the same for some other people, too, but haven't chased it
down.
Hint: it is there, your client isn't
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:45:12 +0100
Wim De Smet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/24/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Interestingly, there is no two-line instruction on your mail.
I've noticed the same for some other people,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:47:50PM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:38:00AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
} Hi spam-killers,
} Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
} It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Sure, no problem. Now,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 09:01:52PM -0700, Scott wrote:
Alex Nordstrom spake thusly on 02/24/2006 10:06 AM:
Saturday, 25 February 2006 00:38, Kevin Mark wrote:
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Presumably,
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:08:17 -0600
Jacob S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi spam-killers,
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:40:04 +0200
Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:08:17 -0600
Jacob S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500
Kevin Mark
Alex Nordstrom spake thusly on 02/24/2006 10:06 AM:
Saturday, 25 February 2006 00:38, Kevin Mark wrote:
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Presumably, KMail users should also be able to participate.
And
John Halton spake thusly on 02/24/2006 09:51 AM:
On 2/24/06, Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] Bounce as in mutt b. I don't know if and how this can be done in
thunderbird
Apparently the following extension allows bouncing using Thunderbird -
http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
Hi spam-killers,
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Cheers,
Kev
- Forwarded message from Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:03:31 -0600
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Hallo!
On 2/24/06, Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] Bounce as in mutt b. I don't know if and how this can be done in
thunderbird
Apparently the following extension allows bouncing using Thunderbird -
http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
Haven't looked into it any further though so don't
Saturday, 25 February 2006 00:38, Kevin Mark wrote:
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Presumably, KMail users should also be able to participate.
- Forwarded message from Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Alex Nordstrom wrote:
Now, as a question of policy, are the half-dozen daily unsubscribe
messages from those too illiterate to comprehend a two-line instruction
added in caps to every message on the list considered spam? They're
certainly unsolicited (nobody wants 'em)
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:38:00AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
} Hi spam-killers,
} Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
} It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Sure, no problem. Now, given that I archive my spam (yes, spamassassin is
trained on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi spam-killers,
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Cheers,
Kev
Sylpheed users are also
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:06:27 +0800
Alex Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, as a question of policy, are the half-dozen daily unsubscribe
messages from those too illiterate to comprehend a two-line
instruction added in caps to every message on the list considered
spam? They're certainly
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Interestingly, there is no two-line instruction on your mail.
I've noticed the same for some other people, too, but haven't chased it
down.
Hint: it is there, your client isn't showing it, and it is related to gpg
support.
Mutt doesn't show it (by
24 matches
Mail list logo
