On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:23:31PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> In <20090529013505.ga12...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Adding versioned Provides would affect all the software that tries
> >to process Debian packages and reason about their dependency
In <20090529013505.ga12...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:21:38AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
>> In <20090528153521.ga31...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> >On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 08:35 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
> was heard to say:
> > Isn't that supposed to change in the future (but perhaps not before
> > Squeeze)
> > so that we can have versioned dependencies on virtual packag
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:28:42PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi debmasters,
>
> I thought I'd give the Webkit based Midori browser
> a try, and ran into a dependency problem.
>
> I've got libwebkit.
>
> ii libwebkit-1.0-2 1.1.7-1 Web
> content engine l
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:21:38AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> In <20090528153521.ga31...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
> was heard to say:
> >> Isn't that supposed to change in the fu
In <20090528153521.ga31...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
>> Isn't that supposed to change in the future (but perhaps not before
>> Squeeze) so that we can have versioned dependencies on virtual
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> Isn't that supposed to change in the future (but perhaps not before Squeeze)
> so that we can have versioned dependencies on virtual packages?
Yes. It's been supposed to change in the future for at least t
On 2009-05-28 16:02 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <20090528135056.gb13...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>>
>> Also, a request for a package with a version constraint can never
>>be satisfied by another package, even if a Provides relationship
>>exists.
>
> Isn't that
In <20090528135056.gb13...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:59:50AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
>> You have the package "libwebkit-1.0-2" version "1.1.7-1". But, the
>> package "midori" needs the package "libwebkit-1.0-1" version "1
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:59:50AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> You have the package "libwebkit-1.0-2" version "1.1.7-1". But, the package
> "midori" needs the package "libwebkit-1.0-1" version "1.0.1" or greater.
> Package names are only compared for equality; they are
In <20090526222842.ga5...@sprite>, Joel Roth wrote:
>I thought I'd give the Webkit based Midori browser
>a try, and ran into a dependency problem.
>
>I've got libwebkit.
>
>ii libwebkit-1.0-2 1.1.7-1
>ii libwebkit-1.0-common 1.1.7-1
>
>What about Midori:
># ap
On Tue, 26 May 2009 12:28:42 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi debmasters,
>
> I thought I'd give the Webkit based Midori browser
> a try, and ran into a dependency problem.
>
> I've got libwebkit.
>
> ii libwebkit-1.0-2 1.1.7-1
> Web content engine library for Gtk+ ii
> libweb
Hi debmasters,
I thought I'd give the Webkit based Midori browser
a try, and ran into a dependency problem.
I've got libwebkit.
ii libwebkit-1.0-2 1.1.7-1 Web
content engine library for Gtk+
ii libwebkit-1.0-common 1.1.7-1
13 matches
Mail list logo
