I've been downloading and installing from www.mozilla.org to run on
Woody. Updating and reinstalling the plugins is only slightly pain-
ful. I am running into two problems, I'd appreciate it if any
one out there can help.
1. Bad fonts in JavaVM
When I run Java VMs, specifically, when I play chess
"duraid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This message was sent from Geocrawler.com by "duraid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Personally, I like to install recent builds by
> >hand... however, if you
> >want a debian package, you'll have to get the
> >most recent out of
> >sid/unstable (stable and test
> As an aside, does there exist an up-to-date Mozilla debian package?
> The one I can currently apt-get is the milestone 18 (!) release, so
> I've been installing the recent builds by hand. Is there a better way
> to do this?
>
>
You are running testing or stable. In unstable it is 0.9.5. If you
Gordon Paynter wrote:
On Monday 15 October 2001 09:45, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
As an aside, does there exist an up-to-date Mozilla debian package?
The one I can current
on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:54:58PM -0700, Gordon Paynter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Monday 15 October 2001 09:45, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
> > I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> > seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
>
> As an aside, does
Hey,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:54:58PM -0700, Gordon Paynter wrote:
> As an aside, does there exist an up-to-date Mozilla debian package?
> The one I can currently apt-get is the milestone 18 (!) release, so
> I've been installing the recent builds by hand. Is there a better way
> to do this?
H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 13:54:58 -0700, Gordon Paynter wrote:
> As an aside, does there exist an up-to-date Mozilla debian package?
Yes, in "unstable". See
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html for why it's not in
"testing" yet.
HTH,
Ray
--
POPULATION EXPLOSION Unique in huma
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:54:58PM -0700, Gordon Paynter wrote:
> On Monday 15 October 2001 09:45, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
> > I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> > seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
>
> As an aside, does there exist an up-to-
Gordon Paynter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 15 October 2001 09:45, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
> > I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> > seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
>
> As an aside, does there exist an up-to-date Mozilla debian
* Gordon Paynter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011027 12:32]:
>
> As an aside, does there exist an up-to-date Mozilla debian package?
> The one I can currently apt-get is the milestone 18 (!) release, so
> I've been installing the recent builds by hand. Is there a better way
> to do this?
Unstable has 0.9.
On Monday 15 October 2001 09:45, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
> I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
As an aside, does there exist an up-to-date Mozilla debian package?
The one I can currently apt-get is the milest
on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 07:35:20AM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> > "Karsten M. Self" writes:
> >
> > > To this extent, the CSS spec is severely flawed in that it grants
> > > precedence to website author, not reader. This
on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:52:52PM -0400, Alan Shutko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" writes:
>
> > To this extent, the CSS spec is severely flawed in that it grants
> > precedence to website author, not reader. This is bass ackwards.
>
> One major point of CSS was explicitly to
> Dunno if it affects css or not but I believe there's a mozilla bug filed
> fo the whole min font size set to 14 deal and to make a UI for the user
> to set it with.
It's Bug 104937, which has been closed / invalid because the 14 point
thing is a Debian package issue. One of the later comments m
"Jeffrey W. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
>> One major point of CSS was explicitly to grant precedence to reader to
>> override things. It's browser vendors/authors who have been unable to
>> grasp this concept, and come up with a decent UI.
> Mozi
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" writes:
>
> > To this extent, the CSS spec is severely flawed in that it grants
> > precedence to website author, not reader. This is bass ackwards.
>
> One major point of CSS was explicitly to grant precedence to reader to
> override
"Karsten M. Self" writes:
> ...which again calls for: the user should be able to specify font size,
> to whatever arbitrary extent possible and override *all* website
> directives in this regard. To this extent, the CSS spec is severely
> flawed in that it grants precedence to website author, no
"Karsten M. Self" writes:
> To this extent, the CSS spec is severely flawed in that it grants
> precedence to website author, not reader. This is bass ackwards.
One major point of CSS was explicitly to grant precedence to reader to
override things. It's browser vendors/authors who have been un
on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 07:55:06PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> > on Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 08:45:06AM -0800, Christopher S. Swingley ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed th
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 08:45:06AM -0800, Christopher S. Swingley ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> > seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
>
> Frankly, this IMO is a feat
on Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 08:45:06AM -0800, Christopher S. Swingley ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
> Shows up with all fonts being the same size except the last two lines,
> whic
I think this problem has been resolved with mozilla-browser-0.9.5-2.
The problem (see Mozilla bug 104937) was the the file
/usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref/unix.js
contains the line
pref("font.minimum-size.x-western", 14);
which means that Western fonts will be displayed at a minimum siz
> > http://www.frontier.iarc.uaf.edu/~cswingle/test_css.html
> >
> > It has font styles with 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 20 point fonts.
> > On my display 8 - 14 are exactly the same, 16 is a bit larger, and
> > 20 is a bit larger than that.
>
> no problems here at all! all fonts showed properly, w
> > http://www.frontier.iarc.uaf.edu/~cswingle/test_css.html
>
> This is how the above example URL looks on my mozilla nightly build
> (from yesterday) on woody:
>
> http://home.jam.rr.com/dvb/css_font.jpg
Thanks. I've installed 0.9.5-1 on more than one sid machine and the
font sizes aren't
Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
> Thanks. As it turns out, my HTML example was a poor one. The real bug
> comes when using font sizes in style sheets. This can be viewed at:
>
> http://www.frontier.iarc.uaf.edu/~cswingle/test_css.html
>
> It has font styles with 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 20 p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher S. Swingley) writes:
>
> http://www.frontier.iarc.uaf.edu/~cswingle/test_css.html
>
> It has font styles with 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 20 point fonts.
> On my display 8 - 14 are exactly the same, 16 is a bit larger, and
> 20 is a bit larger than that.
>
> At lea
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
[...]
> http://www.frontier.iarc.uaf.edu/~cswingle/test_css.html
>
> It has font styles with 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 20 point fonts.
> On my display 8 - 14 are exactly the same, 16 is a bit larger, and
> 20 is a bit larger than that.
>
no pro
Joachim,
> > > > I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> > > > seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
> >
> > It's just a series of lines from N = -5 to N = +5.
> > Each line should display in a different size font.
>
> Here the lines from "Two" upwards s
"Christopher S. Swingley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> > > seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
> A quick test is at:
>
> http://www.frontier.iarc.uaf.edu/~cswingle/test.html
>
> It's just a series of lin
> I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
FYI, this is Debian bug #115689
Also registered with Mozilla as bug #104868
Chris
--
Christopher S. Swingley phone: 907-474-2689
Computer / Network Manager
> > I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> > seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
>
> You might want to search on http://bugzilla.mozilla.org to see if
> there's already a bug filed for this and, if not, file a new one. I
> doubt that this is a Debian-rel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher S. Swingley) writes:
> I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
> seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
You might want to search on http://bugzilla.mozilla.org to see if
there's already a bug filed for this and, if not, file a
I just moved from Mozilla 0.9.4 to 0.9.5 and noticed that it doesn't
seem to be respecting font sizes. For example,
Negative five
Negative four
Negative three
Negative two
Negative one
Zero
One
33 matches
Mail list logo
