> I installed Mozilla today on my potato system. It was very slow. I don't
> know how to say this, but if this is how it is supposed to perform it is
> no better than it's "dad" Netscape. In fact, it is "worse".
This is a known issue, and from what I've heard, the problem lies in gtk,
not Mozilla
Quoting Christian Dysthe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I installed Mozilla today on my potato system. It was very slow. I don't know
> how to say this, but if this is how it is supposed to perform it is no better
> than it's "dad" Netscape. In fact, it is "worse".
Yep. Slow as molasses. But I found it wa
On 04-Jun-99 Jim Foltz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tried Mozilla Milestone 6 and found it nearly as fast as Netscape 4.5.
> I
> have an AMD K-5 133 with 32 megs mem and 120 megs swap. M6 is noticeably
> faster than M5, BTW, though it still crashed a lot.
>
> It will run faster when they compile wi
Hi,
I just tried Mozilla Milestone 6 and found it nearly as fast as Netscape 4.5. I
have an AMD K-5 133 with 32 megs mem and 120 megs swap. M6 is noticeably
faster than M5, BTW, though it still crashed a lot.
It will run faster when they compile with the debugging directives
removed. I am lookin
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Christian Dysthe wrote:
>
> I installed Mozilla today on my potato system. It was very slow. I don't know
> how to say this, but if this is how it is supposed to perform it is no better
> than it's "dad" Netscape. In fact, it is "worse".
>
> I really hope it is my system, but
Hi,
I installed Mozilla today on my potato system. It was very slow. I don't know
how to say this, but if this is how it is supposed to perform it is no better
than it's "dad" Netscape. In fact, it is "worse".
I really hope it is my system, but then again, why would only Moxilla be slow
like that
6 matches
Mail list logo
