Quoting Carel Fellinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Yep, that seems to be the tradition in Open Software Circles anyway,
so be my guest:) I improved a bit on that recepy (better locking):
| cat $FOLDER touch -m -d next sec $FOLDER
Thanks - I've had to modify it slightly for a Sun because
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:42:47PM +, David Wright wrote:
...
Thanks - I've had to modify it slightly for a Sun because touch isn't
so clever, and it becomes either
cat $BOX sleep 2 touch -m $BOX
or, better locking but much worse looking,
cat $BOX env TZ=EST touch -m -t `date
Quoting Carel Fellinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:42:47PM +, David Wright wrote:...
Thanks - I've had to modify it slightly for a Sun because touch isn't
so clever, and it becomes either
wonder what happens of you go to far west and hit the date border:)
Yes,
Hai,
lately I've problems with mutt detecting the arrival of new mail.
I use procmail to sort my mail in folders, for each list a seperate
folder. In order to weed out the empty mailboxes in the c tab-tab
window, I've unset save_empty and now mutt doesn't seem to notice
the first arrived mail.
Quoting Carel Fellinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In order to weed out the empty mailboxes in the c tab-tab
window, I've unset save_empty
... presumably so it deletes empty mailboxes.
It seems to have to do with access and modification times, the first
mail to be delivered to a non-existing
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 07:17:08PM +, David Wright wrote:
...
Nice. The problem hadn't worried me enough to look for a workaround,
but may I steal that?
Yep, that seems to be the tradition in Open Software Circles anyway,
so be my guest:) I improved a bit on that recepy (better locking):
6 matches
Mail list logo
