I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list, and
neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be moderating
complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing spa--ers to do
what they like.
I've had a few drinks, but am especially pi--ed off
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote:
I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list,
and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be
moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing
spa--ers
KS wrote:
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote:
I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list,
and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be
moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing
On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote:
I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list,
and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be
moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing
spa--ers to do what they
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 03:35:41PM -0400, KS wrote:
KS wrote:
Nigel Henry wrote:
A serious question. How can the spa--ers post to the list, using any
words
they like, and yet when I complain to the list using the same words they
do,
I am blocked from posting???
The only
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:35:41 -0400
KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way I know to report spam is to click the Report Spam
button on the web interface for list archives. Can that be done
via Iceweasel(or other mail clients) interface so that users
don't have to go and find that
Raquel wrote:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:35:41 -0400
KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way I know to report spam is to click the Report Spam
button on the web interface for list archives. Can that be done
via Iceweasel(or other mail clients) interface so that users
don't have to go and find
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote:
No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an
email client can also report spam just as we can do via the web
interface manually. If it was possible, my client (and possibly several
others) could have already updated
Hi,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 14:33:08 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote:
No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an
email client can also report spam just as we can do via the web
interface manually. If it was
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 14:33:08 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote:
No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an
email client can also report spam just as we can do via the web
10 matches
Mail list logo
