Re: Network issue

Hi. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 06:38:50AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:32:24AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:43:00PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Reco wrote: > > > > 3) e1000e may be bad, but

Re: Network issue

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:32:24AM +0300, Reco wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:43:00PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Reco wrote: > 3) e1000e may be bad, but vmxnet3 will make oom-killer an everyday > reality. SR-IOV is a way to go. everyday? really?

Re: Network issue

Hi. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:43:00PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Reco wrote: > > 3) e1000e may be bad, but vmxnet3 will make oom-killer an everyday > > reality. SR-IOV is a way to go. > > everyday? really? when did you last try this? Saw the

Re: Network issue

Hi. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:37:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:00 PM Reco wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:18:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > > > Hi, I've never used OVH. How certain are you that the e1000 network driver > > > is the

Re: Network issue

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:58:47PM +0300, Reco wrote: 3) e1000e may be bad, but vmxnet3 will make oom-killer an everyday reality. SR-IOV is a way to go. everyday? really? when did you last try this?

Re: Network issue

> ... I advise to look at your hardware configuration like flow control. > This line doesn't seem good for me (mind the text in bold): > > "Aug 28 15:50:34 ovh-1 kernel: e1000e: enp1s0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full > Duplex, *Flow Control: None"* In general, enabling flow control is a bad idea -

Re: Network issue

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:00 PM Reco wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:18:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > > Hi, I've never used OVH. How certain are you that the e1000 network driver > > is the correct one? > > Under VMWare/ESX the network driver choice can be crucial, for example. > >

Re: Network issue

Dear Kevin, and just one more thing. I am beginner with iptables, but your POSTROUTING doesn't seem good as well. You made a POSTROUTING in the case of VM-s what you manage (they can see the internet), but there is no source change on IP packets which goes in the direction of your VM-s. Your

Re: Network issue

Dear all, the explanation of Reco seems quite good for me. If you use load generator on your mobile device it could be the reason. What happens if you use a normal download for a large file? Do you get the same result? If yes, I advise to look at your hardware configuration like flow control.

Re: Network issue

Hi. Please do not top post. This is a mailing list, not a corporate e-mail spamfest. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:18:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > Hi, I've never used OVH. How certain are you that the e1000 network driver > is the correct one? > Under VMWare/ESX the network driver

Re: Network issue

Hi, I've never used OVH. How certain are you that the e1000 network driver is the correct one? Under VMWare/ESX the network driver choice can be crucial, for example. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:30 AM Kevin DAGNEAUX wrote: > Hi, > > I've a server in OVH datacenter, on this server i've 7 VMs, on 1

Network issue

Hi, I've a server in OVH datacenter, on this server i've 7 VMs, on 1 of them in run Apache. To debug a slow upload (who was ~2Mo/s instead 12Mo/s) i've installed an HTML5/PHP speed test application. When i use this app, i've no problem in general, but, when a make a speed test from a source

Re: Network issue........

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:40:20 +1000 Charlie wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 19:18:50 -0400 Neal P. Murphy sent: > > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:00:51 +1000 > > Charlie wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:31:36 -0600 Joe Pfeiffer sent: > >

Re: Network issue........

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 19:18:50 -0400 Neal P. Murphy sent: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:00:51 +1000 > Charlie wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:31:36 -0600 Joe Pfeiffer sent: > > > > > > Kernel IP routing table > > > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window

Re: Network issue........

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:00:51 +1000 Charlie wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:31:36 -0600 Joe Pfeiffer sent: > > > > Kernel IP routing table > > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface > > > 0.0.0.0 10.80.2.85 0.0.0.0 UG 00

Re: Network issue........

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:31:36 -0600 Joe Pfeiffer sent: > > Kernel IP routing table > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface > > 0.0.0.0 10.80.2.85 0.0.0.0 UG 00 0 eth0 > > 10.80.2.84 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 00 0 eth0 > > > > But

Re: Network issue........

Charlie <ariest...@ipstarmail.com.au> writes: > Hello Debian Users, > > I have a network issue that I find perplexing: > > When I do: # netstat -r -n > > or > > # route > > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt

Re: Network issue........

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:54:08 +0100 Darac Marjal sent: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:26:55PM +1000, Charlie wrote: > > > >Hello Debian Users, > > > >I have a network issue that I find perplexing: > > > >When I do: # netstat -r -n > > > &

Re: Network issue........

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:20:30PM CEST, Darac Marjal said: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:07:51AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > >On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 04:54:08 AM Darac Marjal wrote: > >>On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:26:55PM +1000, Charlie wrote: > >>>Kernel

Re: Network issue........

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:07:51AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 04:54:08 AM Darac Marjal wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:26:55PM +1000, Charlie wrote: >Kernel IP routing table >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface >0.0.0.0

Re: Network issue........

On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 04:54:08 AM Darac Marjal wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:26:55PM +1000, Charlie wrote: > >Kernel IP routing table > >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface > >0.0.0.0 10.80.2.85 0.0.0.0 UG 00 0 eth0 > >10.80.2.84

Re: Network issue........

I suppose you are using DHCP: the gw is assigned by the service. Il 13 set 2016 08:27, "Charlie" <ariest...@ipstarmail.com.au> ha scritto: > > Hello Debian Users, > > I have a network issue that I find perplexing: > > When I do: # netstat -r -n > > or

Re: Network issue........

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:26:55PM +1000, Charlie wrote: Hello Debian Users, I have a network issue that I find perplexing: When I do: # netstat -r -n or # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 0.0.0.0 10.80.2.85 0.0.0.0 UG 0

Network issue........

Hello Debian Users, I have a network issue that I find perplexing: When I do: # netstat -r -n or # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 0.0.0.0 10.80.2.85 0.0.0.0 UG 00 0 eth0 10.80.2.84 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252

Re: Jessie network issue

it appears that there is a problem with guest vm adapter type. After changing , the network worked on reboot. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:26 PM Roman Gelfand wrote: > I am running jessie on both virtualbox 5 host and guest. The host > networking is using eth0 interface and

Jessie network issue

I am running jessie on both virtualbox 5 host and guest. The host networking is using eth0 interface and is fine. On the guest, I have 8 virtual interfaces on the physical eth0. When I bring up the guest, the networking service starts, yet the network is unreachable. Then, when i restart the

network issue [random disconnection} after sid upgrade

Hi, After a recent upgrade of Jessie/sid I experience some network disconnections (of both wired and wireless interface). Does anyone else have this problem and is this line have a particular meaning : NetworkManager[582]: error [1408629866.746297] [platform/nm-linux-platform.c:1714]

Re: network issue

Kailash a écrit : I've got two machines at home with Debian (Wheezy) installed: A B. A is a desktop and B is a laptop. A connects to the network via a wired connection and B via the wireless. Both have RAM in excess of 1 GB and for machine A, I've set up XFCE. When browsing the internet,

Re: network issue

On Monday 26 August 2013 01:22 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Kailash a écrit : I've got two machines at home with Debian (Wheezy) installed: A B. A is a desktop and B is a laptop. A connects to the network via a wired connection and B via the wireless. Both have RAM in excess of 1 GB and for

Re: network issue

On 8/26/13, Kailash listskail...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 26 August 2013 01:22 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Kailash a écrit : I've got two machines at home with Debian (Wheezy) installed: A B. A is a desktop and B is a laptop. A connects to the network via a wired connection and B via the

RE: network issue

-Original Message- From: Pascal Hambourg [mailto:pas...@plouf.fr.eu.org] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:53 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network issue Kailash a écrit : I've got two machines at home with Debian (Wheezy) installed: A B. A is a desktop and B

network issue

Hi, I've got two machines at home with Debian (Wheezy) installed: A B. A is a desktop and B is a laptop. A connects to the network via a wired connection and B via the wireless. Both have RAM in excess of 1 GB and for machine A, I've set up XFCE. When browsing the internet, I often find that B

Re: how to examine the network issue

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:18:50 +0800, lina wrote: I found I can ssh to server, To what server? Local server, remote server...? local. it happened in the past. now it's gone. but could not open some webpage. What page?

Re: how to examine the network issue

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:14:25 +0800, lina wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:18:50 +0800, lina wrote: I found I can ssh to server, To what server? Local server, remote server...? local. it happened in the past. now it's gone.

Re: how to examine the network issue

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:18:50 +0800, lina wrote: I found I can ssh to server, To what server? Local server, remote server...? but could not open some webpage. What page? but can open google on and off. is it weird? It is if you don't provide more data :-) The connection was reset (...)

how to examine the network issue

Hi, I found I can ssh to server, but could not open some webpage. but can open google on and off. is it weird? The connection was reset The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading. The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few

Re: Odd network issue

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:29:17 -0500, gun_smoke wrote: I'm have some issues while connected to the network on campus only. From the moment I get connected to the wifi, bwm-ng is reporting I'm receiving nearly 50KB/s of traffic. I don't have a browsers open etc. Looking at tcpdump, I see a lot

Re: Odd network issue

On 11/10/2010 04:29 PM, gun_sm...@shellium.org wrote: I'm have some issues while connected to the network on campus only. From the moment I get connected to the wifi, bwm-ng is reporting I'm receiving nearly 50KB/s of traffic. I don't have a browsers open etc. Looking at tcpdump, I see a lot of

Re: Odd network issue

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:54:36AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: What, if any, firewall do you have installed? I had the same problem here when I (finally) got a wireless setup. I tried a bunch of firewalls and and settled on arno-iptables-firewall and privoxy. Now I can surf the web and

Re: Odd network issue

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:06:14AM +, Camaleón wrote: Mmm, your problem is that you cannot browse the web? Then perform the usual steps: ping -c 3 google.com dig google.com traceroute google.com I can ping google. No packet loss, but the times are in the 1000-2000ms times. -- To

Odd network issue

I'm have some issues while connected to the network on campus only. From the moment I get connected to the wifi, bwm-ng is reporting I'm receiving nearly 50KB/s of traffic. I don't have a browsers open etc. Looking at tcpdump, I see a lot of this. tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or

Re: help - Browsing network Issue after installing SAMBA?

On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:32:49 -0700, dbpbandit posted: I've been experimenting with several distributions of Linux over the past few months and I finally decided on Debian for many reasons. Currently I have it running on a couple of laptops and an old PC. The PC has two HDD, one has Debian

Re: help - Browsing network Issue after installing SAMBA?

The method I used before was just using Nautilus 2.20.0 network Windows Network select the server and brows from there. Never got any error messages, it worked fine. Turns out I ended up doing a reinstall and this time I didn't select the File Server option, works fine now. I will post a new

help - Browsing network Issue after installing SAMBA?

I've been experimenting with several distributions of Linux over the past few months and I finally decided on Debian for many reasons. Currently I have it running on a couple of laptops and an old PC. The PC has two HDD, one has Debian Lenny and the other has Fedora 9 so I could switch between the

Network issue with WOODY

Hi all, I tried searching the archives with no luck. I have a standard load of Debian running and am constantly having problems with the network not responding when trying to connect to the box. No matter waht I try to hit, smtp ssh web, it will not respond unless I try and re-connect many

Re: Network issue with WOODY

Robert == Robert Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert Hi all, I tried searching the archives with no luck. I Robert have a standard load of Debian running and am constantly Robert having problems with the network not responding when Robert trying to connect to the box. No

Re: Network issue

From: Bradley Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Moe Binkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network issue Date: 17 Jun 2003 00:34:26 -0400 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 22:25, Moe Binkerman wrote: what happens if you just do the ifconfig command and then route? When The same thing

Network issue

Got a networking question. I have this box thats acting as a firewall. Basically, its a PII/350 running Woody and gShield. eth0 is the external interface (DSL) and eth1 is the internal interface. When Verizon screwed him, he got cablemodem as a backup connection. So I added another interface (all

Re: Network issue

Here's a wild guess. Try a soft reboot of just networking and those ethernet cards, like: /sbin/ifconfig eth0 down /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up /etc/init.d/network restart Bradley Alexander wrote: Got a networking question. I have this box thats acting as a firewall. Basically, its a PII/350 running

Re: Network issue

you tryto swap over? From: Bradley Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network issue Date: 16 Jun 2003 21:18:15 -0400 Got a networking question. I have this box thats acting as a firewall. Basically, its a PII/350 running Woody and gShield. eth0 is the external interface

Re: Network issue

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 22:25, Moe Binkerman wrote: what happens if you just do the ifconfig command and then route? When The same thing. Usually it takes about two network commands before things start going awry. I tried on one boot to bring eth2 up with no default gateway, so it would be on

Very strange network issue

Hi, I have a debian/woody + some sid packages which includes a very strange issue. Whenever I connect to certain site with opera, netscape, konqueror, lynx or links, I never get an ackgowledge packet. Therefore, the http connection always fail with a no answer kind of message. The sites which

Re: Very strange network issue

On Monday 08 October 2001 07:22 am, Jean-Paul Smets wrote: Hi, I have a debian/woody + some sid packages which includes a very strange issue. Whenever I connect to certain site with opera, netscape, konqueror, lynx or links, I never get an ackgowledge packet. Therefore, the http connection

Re: Very strange network issue

Thank you so much for your help. I could finnd one article on this issue in DP http://www.debianplanet.org/debianplanet/article.php?sid=374 Now I understand what is this issue. JPS. -- Jean-Paul Smets-Solanes [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 40FF FA78 75AA 680D 8BB4 EEF9 539A

Re: Very strange network issue

You probably have the ECN bit set in your networking. I ran into a similar problem when I switched to 2.4 kernel. See http://urchin.earth.li/ecn/ for more information. Randy On Mon, 2001-10-08 at 04:22, Jean-Paul Smets wrote: Hi, I have a debian/woody + some sid packages which includes a