Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-04-22 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Saturday 04 March 2017 13:32:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote: > > Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting > > Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing > > your message (and

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-27 Thread kAt
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 07:13:22PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > In other words Back EMF? > > I know a chap who found about that the hard way when he tried to get > something from nothing by charging a battery from a generator which he > turned by having a fan

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-27 Thread cbannister
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 07:13:22PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:16:36 John Hasler wrote: > > > Gene Heskett writes: > > > Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction > > > motor that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also > > >

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: > Induction motors can function as generators. You just need to connect > them to an appropriate AC source and drive them above synchronous > speed. Gene writes: > Yes, there is that exception, they need an excitation current, true, > but in that case they make excellent brakes as they

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:16:36 John Hasler wrote: > Gene Heskett writes: > > Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction > > motor that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also > > be used as a motor... > > Induction motors can function as generators. You

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:04:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote: > ΟΚ! > > Gene Heskett: > > On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote: > >> Back to shanity, how does a microphone produce an electrical wave > >> that can be translated into sound and how a wave may take the form > >> of electrical

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread John Hasler
Gene Heskett writes: > Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction motor > that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also be used as > a motor... Induction motors can function as generators. You just need to connect them to an appropriate AC source and

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread GiaThnYgeia
ΟΚ! Gene Heskett: > On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote: > >> Back to shanity, how does a microphone produce an electrical wave that >> can be translated into sound and how a wave may take the form of >> electrical current that produces sound through a speaker? > > Very simple.

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote: > Curt: > > In case this wasn't clear: we're imagining clay being fashioned upon > > a potter's wheel, and the striations that occur in the clay as it is > > molded (which might possibly produce, according to Charpak's > > conjecture, a sort of

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread GiaThnYgeia
Curt: > > In case this wasn't clear: we're imagining clay being fashioned upon a > potter's wheel, and the striations that occur in the clay as it is > molded (which might possibly produce, according to Charpak's conjecture, > a sort of analog audio recording of ambient sounds in the finished >

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread Curt
On 2017-03-05, Curt wrote: > On 2017-03-04, deloptes wrote: >> GiaThnYgeia wrote: >> >>> PS  Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are >>> recorded by one's only true friend, the PC   :)) :))) >> >> Paranormal activities :D >> >> I think it

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-05 Thread Curt
On 2017-03-04, deloptes wrote: > GiaThnYgeia wrote: > >> PS  Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are >> recorded by one's only true friend, the PC   :)) :))) > > Paranormal activities :D > > I think it could be some voltage induced by physical contact. >

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-04 Thread deloptes
GiaThnYgeia wrote: > PS  Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are > recorded by one's only true friend, the PC   :)) :))) Paranormal activities :D I think it could be some voltage induced by physical contact. Think logically - if there is no mic or nothing plugged in to

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-04 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:25:00AM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote: [...] > Come to think of it, do newsgroups still exist? To round-up this thread's recursive meta-hijacking: oh, yes, they definitely exist. There are a couple of providers out there

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-04 Thread rhkramer
On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote: > Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting > Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing > your message (and possibly delete the quoted text, change the Subject > line, et cetera).

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-04 Thread GiaThnYgeia
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/fmit https://packages.debian.org/stretch/fmit Here are the two current versions of it and I like it because it gives a little more control in tuning out noise and concentrate in what I want to measure. It is most probably electrical noise and fluctuations of

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-04 Thread GiaThnYgeia
The Wanderer: > On 2017-03-03 at 14:35, deloptes wrote: > >> The Wanderer wrote: >> >>> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an >>> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message >>> is unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know >>>

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread The Wanderer
On 2017-03-03 at 14:35, deloptes wrote: > The Wanderer wrote: > >> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an >> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message >> is unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know >> how to do this. (Or be

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread Ric Moore
On 03/03/2017 08:53 AM, GiaThnYgeia wrote: I plugged then in to 3 different machines, downloaded FMIT and run it. Similar results. Is it in the repos?? Ric -- My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread deloptes
The Wanderer wrote: > True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an > existing message threads the reply in under the existing message is > unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know how to do > this. (Or be using a mail client which does permit that.) But

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread deloptes
GiaThnYgeia wrote: > I don't see how the previous got linked to a previous thread so I am > reposting with additional clarification. > > OK, I did some testing on an other machine with a testing installation, > downloaded FMIT (an instrument tuner that will pickup audio input/analog > and tell

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread Frank
Op 03-03-17 om 14:15 schreef Greg Wooledge: Or manually remove the In-Reply-To: header, if your mail user agent permits you to do this. Don't forget the References: header. Regards, Frank

No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread GiaThnYgeia
I don't see how the previous got linked to a previous thread so I am reposting with additional clarification. OK, I did some testing on an other machine with a testing installation, downloaded FMIT (an instrument tuner that will pickup audio input/analog and tell you all kinds of stuff about the

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread The Wanderer
On 2017-03-03 at 08:15, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:13:37AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > >> In order to start a new thread, you have to create the E-mail from >> scratch, e.g. by using a "New Mail" button or the equivalent. >> Creating an E-mail by replying to an existing

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:13:37AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > In order to start a new thread, you have to create the E-mail from > scratch, e.g. by using a "New Mail" button or the equivalent. Creating > an E-mail by replying to an existing message puts the new message into > an existing thread,

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread The Wanderer
On 2017-03-03 at 05:46, deloptes wrote: > GiaThnYgeia wrote: > >> It probably has nothing to do with the program itself but its >> dependencies and some code feeding in wrong data as audio input. >> But it is actual sound > > you have to provide information so that it may be reproduced. Please

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-03 Thread deloptes
GiaThnYgeia wrote: > It probably has nothing to do with the program itself but its > dependencies and some code feeding in wrong data as audio input.  But it > is actual sound you have to provide information so that it may be reproduced. Please open another thread. The information you provided

No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-03-02 Thread GiaThnYgeia
OK, I did some testing on an other machine with a testing installation, downloaded FMIT (an instrument tuner that will pickup audio inpur/analog and tell you all kinds of stuff about the wave that is fed). Same exact behavior, hardware only lists two audio inputs and are both unplugged. The lower