On Saturday 04 March 2017 13:32:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote:
> > Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting
> > Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing
> > your message (and
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 07:13:22PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> In other words Back EMF?
>
> I know a chap who found about that the hard way when he tried to get
> something from nothing by charging a battery from a generator which he
> turned by having a fan
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 07:13:22PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:16:36 John Hasler wrote:
>
> > Gene Heskett writes:
> > > Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction
> > > motor that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also
> > >
I wrote:
> Induction motors can function as generators. You just need to connect
> them to an appropriate AC source and drive them above synchronous
> speed.
Gene writes:
> Yes, there is that exception, they need an excitation current, true,
> but in that case they make excellent brakes as they
On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:16:36 John Hasler wrote:
> Gene Heskett writes:
> > Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction
> > motor that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also
> > be used as a motor...
>
> Induction motors can function as generators. You
On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:04:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> ΟΚ!
>
> Gene Heskett:
> > On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> >> Back to shanity, how does a microphone produce an electrical wave
> >> that can be translated into sound and how a wave may take the form
> >> of electrical
Gene Heskett writes:
> Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction motor
> that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also be used as
> a motor...
Induction motors can function as generators. You just need to connect
them to an appropriate AC source and
ΟΚ!
Gene Heskett:
> On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
>> Back to shanity, how does a microphone produce an electrical wave that
>> can be translated into sound and how a wave may take the form of
>> electrical current that produces sound through a speaker?
>
> Very simple.
On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> Curt:
> > In case this wasn't clear: we're imagining clay being fashioned upon
> > a potter's wheel, and the striations that occur in the clay as it is
> > molded (which might possibly produce, according to Charpak's
> > conjecture, a sort of
Curt:
>
> In case this wasn't clear: we're imagining clay being fashioned upon a
> potter's wheel, and the striations that occur in the clay as it is
> molded (which might possibly produce, according to Charpak's conjecture,
> a sort of analog audio recording of ambient sounds in the finished
>
On 2017-03-05, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-03-04, deloptes wrote:
>> GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>>
>>> PS Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are
>>> recorded by one's only true friend, the PC :)) :)))
>>
>> Paranormal activities :D
>>
>> I think it
On 2017-03-04, deloptes wrote:
> GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
>> PS Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are
>> recorded by one's only true friend, the PC :)) :)))
>
> Paranormal activities :D
>
> I think it could be some voltage induced by physical contact.
>
GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> PS Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are
> recorded by one's only true friend, the PC :)) :)))
Paranormal activities :D
I think it could be some voltage induced by physical contact.
Think logically - if there is no mic or nothing plugged in to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:25:00AM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
[...]
> Come to think of it, do newsgroups still exist?
To round-up this thread's recursive meta-hijacking:
oh, yes, they definitely exist. There are a couple of
providers out there
On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote:
> Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting
> Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing
> your message (and possibly delete the quoted text, change the Subject
> line, et cetera).
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/fmit
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/fmit
Here are the two current versions of it and I like it because it gives a
little more control in tuning out noise and concentrate in what I want
to measure.
It is most probably electrical noise and fluctuations of
The Wanderer:
> On 2017-03-03 at 14:35, deloptes wrote:
>
>> The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>>> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an
>>> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message
>>> is unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know
>>>
On 2017-03-03 at 14:35, deloptes wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an
>> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message
>> is unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know
>> how to do this. (Or be
On 03/03/2017 08:53 AM, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
I plugged
then in to 3 different machines, downloaded FMIT and run it. Similar
results.
Is it in the repos?? Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of
The Wanderer wrote:
> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an
> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message is
> unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know how to do
> this. (Or be using a mail client which does permit that.)
But
GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> I don't see how the previous got linked to a previous thread so I am
> reposting with additional clarification.
>
> OK, I did some testing on an other machine with a testing installation,
> downloaded FMIT (an instrument tuner that will pickup audio input/analog
> and tell
Op 03-03-17 om 14:15 schreef Greg Wooledge:
Or manually remove the In-Reply-To: header, if your mail user agent
permits you to do this.
Don't forget the References: header.
Regards,
Frank
I don't see how the previous got linked to a previous thread so I am
reposting with additional clarification.
OK, I did some testing on an other machine with a testing installation,
downloaded FMIT (an instrument tuner that will pickup audio input/analog
and tell you all kinds of stuff about the
On 2017-03-03 at 08:15, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:13:37AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> In order to start a new thread, you have to create the E-mail from
>> scratch, e.g. by using a "New Mail" button or the equivalent.
>> Creating an E-mail by replying to an existing
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:13:37AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> In order to start a new thread, you have to create the E-mail from
> scratch, e.g. by using a "New Mail" button or the equivalent. Creating
> an E-mail by replying to an existing message puts the new message into
> an existing thread,
On 2017-03-03 at 05:46, deloptes wrote:
> GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
>> It probably has nothing to do with the program itself but its
>> dependencies and some code feeding in wrong data as audio input.
>> But it is actual sound
>
> you have to provide information so that it may be reproduced. Please
GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> It probably has nothing to do with the program itself but its
> dependencies and some code feeding in wrong data as audio input. But it
> is actual sound
you have to provide information so that it may be reproduced. Please open
another thread. The information you provided
OK, I did some testing on an other machine with a testing installation,
downloaded FMIT (an instrument tuner that will pickup audio inpur/analog
and tell you all kinds of stuff about the wave that is fed).
Same exact behavior, hardware only lists two audio inputs and are both
unplugged. The lower
28 matches
Mail list logo