On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:13:58 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:13:58 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 21:45:24 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:00:13 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>>
>> > Please post the output of:
>> >
>> > grep ^Ori
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 21:45:24 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:00:13 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> > Please post the output of:
> >
> > grep ^Origin /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Release
> >
>
> No output
>
> Perhaps "ls -lt /var/lib/apt/lists" will tell you something. It lis
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:00:13 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> Please post the output of:
>
> grep ^Origin /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Release
>
No output
Perhaps "ls -lt /var/lib/apt/lists" will tell you something. It lists:
total 19224
-rw-r- 1 root root 0 2008-01-20 21:10 lock
drwxr-xr-x
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 20:36:04 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:31:27 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
[ We are trying to figure out why "aptitude search '~i!~Odebian'", a
command meant to find all installed non-Debian packages, returns so
many false positives on Felix's Debi
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:31:27 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> What do you see when you run
> apt-cache policy a2ps adduser alsa-base
> ?
The following:
| a2ps:
| Installed: 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1
| Candidate: 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1
| Version table:
| *** 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1 0
| 500 cdrom://[Debian
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 20:03:37 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:40:09 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:54:02PM +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> >
> >> I recollect running a command that identified non-Debian packages
> >> as part of the upgrade to Etch
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:40:09 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:54:02PM +, Felix Karpfen
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> I recollect running a command that identified non-Debian packages
>> as part of the upgrade to Etch and *the command gave the expected
>> output*. But, alas,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:54:02PM +, Felix Karpfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:34:14 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> They failed to address my misunderstanding and the fault was mine.
>
> My concern arose not from the absence of "vuescan" (which - as pointed
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:34:14 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:54:08 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>> Check for non-Debian packages on your system by running:
>>
>> aptitude search '~i!~Odebian'
>>
>
> As an aptitude-novice, I tried the above command on my
> fully-operationa
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 19:06:27 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Florian Kulzer was heard to say:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 20:34:14 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:54:08 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > > Check for non-Debian pa
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 20:34:14 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> > On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:54:08 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > Check for non-Debian packages on your system by running:
> > >
> > > ap
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 20:34:14 +, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:54:08 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > Check for non-Debian packages on your system by running:
> >
> > aptitude search '~i!~Odebian'
>
> As an aptitude-novice, I tried the above command on my
> fully-operationa
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:54:08 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:54:08 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> Check for non-Debian packages on your system by running:
>
> aptitude search '~i!~Odebian'
>
As an aptitude-novice, I tried the above command on my
fully-operational upgrade from
13 matches
Mail list logo
