David Palmer writes:
...which is quite often the basis for governmental regulation
legislation.
Except that it appears that in Brazil regulation is the source of the
problem.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Karsten,
I was having similar issues with some of my email recipients. Are you
on a cable modem, dsl, or dialup? If so, you're probably going to have
to configure exim to use your ISP's mailserver as a smarthost.
- Ryan
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:32:57AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Martin:
also sprach Ryan Nowakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1609 +0200]:
I was having similar issues with some of my email recipients. Are
you on a cable modem, dsl, or dialup? If so, you're probably
going to have to configure exim to use your ISP's mailserver as
a smarthost.
We have taken
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:42:21 +0200
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Ryan Nowakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1609
+0200]:
I was having similar issues with some of my email recipients. Are
you on a cable modem, dsl, or dialup? If so, you're probably
going to have
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:42:21PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
We have taken the discussion up in private. The problem is in fact
the dynamic IP of the dialup, which I filter using the dynablock
RBL. It just happens that these RBL filter 65% of all my spam
before it hits the content
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:32:38PM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote:
Unfortunately, there are many private victims for false positives of
RBL-like lists, according to them, mostly due to the lack of response
from our ISPs. As a matter of fact, I do have a fixed IP but that is
taken out of a range
If your ISP is being a bitch about it, then switch! Otherwise just
relay via their SMTP smarthost and the problem is solved.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`-
also sprach Jeronimo Pellegrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1738 +0200]:
reject_rbl_client relays.visi.com,
reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client proxies.relays.monkeys.com,
reject_rbl_client opm.blitzed.org,
reject_rbl_client
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:49:21 +0200
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your ISP is being a bitch about it, then switch! Otherwise just
relay via their SMTP smarthost and the problem is solved.
Living in a country where monopolies are ilegal, I could understand
your suggestion.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 05:49:21PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
If your ISP is being a bitch about it, then switch! Otherwise just
relay via their SMTP smarthost and the problem is solved.
Unfortunately, we don't have a lot of options. And the SMTP smarthost
is veeery unreliable. Quite a mess.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 05:55:20PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I already use all of these (plus ordb.org), but most of the spam
(and most of the virus crap) is filtered by dynablock.
Did you try putting dynablock at the end of the list, so as to check
if some dynablock rejects wouldn't be
Also Sprach martin f krafft
I don't see why people don't relay via their ISPs. Is there one good
reason?
Maximum size? FTP!
Not always practical...but then, sending large files via e-mail is a
crapshoot at best anyway.
Aestethics? Colocate!
Not sure what you mean by aestethics.
Privacy
Christoph Simon writes:
Living in a country where monopolies are ilegal...
Which country might that be?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
also sprach Jeronimo Pellegrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.21.1902 +0200]:
Did you try putting dynablock at the end of the list, so as to check
if some dynablock rejects wouldn't be caught by the others first?
Good point. I will do so now.
Anyway -- the situation is a mess, but the point is,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:01:04 -0500
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Simon writes:
Living in a country where monopolies are ilegal...
Which country might that be?
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't offer you a legal definition of a
monopoly, but ask Microsoft about their last big
At 2003-09-21T15:49:21Z, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If your ISP is being a bitch about it, then switch! Otherwise just relay
via their SMTP smarthost and the problem is solved.
Martin,
First, I've beaten this to death on Slashdot, so I don't want to go into
long-winded detail.
Christoph Simon writes:
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't offer you a legal definition of a monopoly,
but ask Microsoft about their last big trial and that which still seem to
be in process in the EU. Or wasn't that in the end about being a monopoly
and taking unfair advantage of it?
The latter.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:52:28 -0300,
Christoph Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:01:04 -0500
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Simon writes:
Living in a country where monopolies are ilegal...
Which country might that be?
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:19:42 -0500
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latter. Having a monopoly is not illegal. Taking unfair advantage
of it is.
It might not be illegal, but the method to reach/hold it might at
least be questionably for a normal citizen.
I have only one provider
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:06:53 +0200
Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any company in the world which can
do that without having the status of a monopoly?
..www.telenor.no ? It only has the copper... ;-)
Ooops. World seems to be a worse place than I thought.
--
Christoph
Christoph Simon writes:
If your only local provider doubles price in a consumer product, what
would happen in your area?
Nothing in particular, in general. For example, there is only one
drugstore in my village. The owner is entirely free to set his prices
however he wishes. Same goes for my
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 05:23:48PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Nothing in particular, in general. For example, there is only one
drugstore in my village. The owner is entirely free to set his prices
however he wishes. Same goes for my ISP.
I think the point is that in Brazil you can't start
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:23:48 -0500
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Simon writes:
If your only local provider doubles price in a consumer product, what
would happen in your area?
Nothing in particular, in general. For example, there is only one
drugstore in my village.
Christoph Simon writes:
One thing is to double prices and expose them _before_ you pay, and
another thing is to double prices you suddenly have to pay in
disagreement with a former contract. Maybe you are a lawyer, but for my
taste, these things stink like hell.
That's got nothing to do with
Jeronimo Pellegrini writes:
I think the point is that in Brazil you can't start offering DSL
service. The monopoly is sort of enforced by a regulating agency.
And thus we have an example of the evils of regulation, not of the evils of
monopoly.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 07:04:07PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Jeronimo Pellegrini writes:
I think the point is that in Brazil you can't start offering DSL
service. The monopoly is sort of enforced by a regulating agency.
And thus we have an example of the evils of regulation, not of the
On Monday 22 September 2003 05:23, Christoph Simon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:06:53 +0200
Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any company in the world which can
do that without having the status of a monopoly?
..www.telenor.no ? It only has the copper... ;-)
Ooops.
Martin:
Your spam blocking is bouncing my mail:
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Received: from mail by ganymede.tranquillity.lan with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22)
id 1A0u2r-0006SS-AP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 03:33:59 +0100
28 matches
Mail list logo
