Re: OT: AI

2019-08-27 Thread rhkramer
Ok, I'm going to try to restrain myself after this: It is possible though, that in one of the other universes, some of us are real. (Wouldn't that be something to see!) (Aside: Are there multiverses of multiverses?) On Monday, August 26, 2019 07:27:00 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Oh, wait,

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-26 Thread mick crane
On 2019-08-26 17:43, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: On 08/26/2019 10:42 AM, mick crane wrote: On 2019-08-26 15:35, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, August 26, 2019 09:46:40 AM Dan Clery wrote: I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... I'm interested. (We may have to move the discussion

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-26 Thread Stephen P. Molnar
On 08/26/2019 10:42 AM, mick crane wrote: On 2019-08-26 15:35, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, August 26, 2019 09:46:40 AM Dan Clery wrote: I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... I'm interested. (We may have to move the discussion off list, but I'd prefer not to.) He mea

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-26 Thread mick crane
On 2019-08-26 15:35, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, August 26, 2019 09:46:40 AM Dan Clery wrote: I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... I'm interested. (We may have to move the discussion off list, but I'd prefer not to.) He means starships on fire off the belt of Orion --

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-26 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, August 26, 2019 09:46:40 AM Dan Clery wrote: > I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... I'm interested. (We may have to move the discussion off list, but I'd prefer not to.)

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-26 Thread Dan Clery
How would I even know? I'm not three laws safe, I know that, but how would I know? I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:27 AM wrote: > Oh, wait, never mind, it turns out we're all just a simulation, so it > really > doesn't matter. > > On Monday, August 26,

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-26 Thread rhkramer
Oh, wait, never mind, it turns out we're all just a simulation, so it really doesn't matter. On Monday, August 26, 2019 07:10:38 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > You bots are very clever, Mick, but you can't fool me -- obviously, because > John is the only human here, you (mick) must be a bot. > >

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-26 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, August 26, 2019 04:55:59 AM mick crane wrote: > On 2019-08-25 13:36, John Hasler wrote: > > You are all AI's. I'm the only human here. > > I spent 2 days question and answer with what turned out to be a yahoo > bot. > mick You bots are very clever, Mick, but you can't fool me -- obvio

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-26 Thread mick crane
On 2019-08-25 13:36, John Hasler wrote: You are all AI's. I'm the only human here. I spent 2 days question and answer with what turned out to be a yahoo bot. mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-25 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
In the end, the Turing Test was another AI sham. Then humans couldnt tell the difference any more :-) Blade Runner is now. To save humanity we must become part machine. That is not crossing a divide, merely the next step in our evolution. In a straight line from our prior milestones. On Sun, Aug 2

Re: OT: AI

2019-08-25 Thread John Hasler
You are all AI's. I'm the only human here. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: OT: AI (was: Re: why won't ff look at this url?)

2019-08-25 Thread rhkramer
Hmm, I probably should have replied to the (sub-)thread started by bw, "How good is AI?" On Sunday, August 25, 2019 08:20:00 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, August 24, 2019 08:47:03 PM Gene Heskett wrote: > > > No programmer is good enough to make a bot like Gene. > > things.>

OT: AI (was: Re: why won't ff look at this url?)

2019-08-25 Thread rhkramer
On Saturday, August 24, 2019 08:47:03 PM Gene Heskett wrote: > > No programmer is good enough to make a bot like Gene. I disagree, now that I think about it. I remember Lisa, and I know there have been great advances in AI (e.g., neural networks, ...) What a stroke of genius by the programme