Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:03:02 +
> "Jeff Gratton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > said that RMS is indeed a loser), I'm just saying that RMS shouldn't be
> > taken at face value anymore, that is all :)
>
> I respectfully disagree -- RMS is one of t
Ethics. how many of us have ethics? It's funny how people are so into
killing our idols when they "betray us".
interesting thread.
happy birthday debian.
I am free.
>>He clearly states his principles, and as far as I know he lives by
them.
That's better than most people can say (including me)
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 10:40, ben wrote:
Rob VanFleet wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37PM -0400, J.F.Gratton wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 22:07, ben wrote:
be fair. if it wasn't for rms, there might very well not be a linux,
much less a debian.
A zealot is a zealot i
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:12:01AM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37PM -0400, J.F.Gratton wrote:
A zealot is a zealot is a zealot. He might have been usefull, but
past a certain point, constant whining
Congratulations, you just joined the 10% of th
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:03:02 +
"Jeff Gratton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> said that RMS is indeed a loser), I'm just saying that RMS shouldn't be
> taken at face value anymore, that is all :)
I respectfully disagree -- RMS is one of the few people I'm aware of who
*should* be taken at face
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:03:02PM +, Jeff Gratton wrote:
> ... well I am *not* native english either, but French-Canadian (Quebecer)=
=20
> :).
French (an En
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:03:02PM +, Jeff Gratton wrote:
> ... well I am *not* native english either, but French-Canadian (Quebecer)
> :).
>
> Thing is.. I am not calling RMS a loser (... looser :) ) either (here I
> don't know if you were joking on people's spelling or implying that my pos
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 09:25:12 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=right
> "In accordance with fact, reason, or truth; correct:"
> So, the spelling is right, and also correct...
Is that a left turn?
Right.
--
Steve C. Lamb
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:12:01AM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
>
> Congratulations, you just joined the 10% of the net (not faulting those
> who aren't native english speakers) that actually *does* spell "whining"
> right (i.e. not "whinging"). Now, just don't call anybody a "looser"
> and you'll
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 10:40, ben wrote:
> Rob VanFleet wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37PM -0400, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 22:07, ben wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>be fair. if it wasn't for rms, there might very well not be a linux,
> >>>much less a debian.
> >>
> >>A ze
t RMS shouldn't be
taken at face value anymore, that is all :)
Jeff
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Rob VanFleet)
To: "Debian list (user)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT: Re: rms on debian : background noise
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:12:01 -0500
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37P
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 03:40:49PM +, ben wrote:
> Rob VanFleet wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37PM -0400, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 22:07, ben wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>be fair. if it wasn't for rms, there might very well not be a linux,
> >>>much less a debian.
>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:12:01AM -0500, rvf wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37PM -0400, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 22:07, ben wrote:
> >
> > > be fair. if it wasn't for rms, there might very well not be a linux,
> > > much less a debian.
> >
> > A zealot is a zealot is
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:12:01AM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37PM -0400, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> > A zealot is a zealot is a zealot. He might have been usefull, but
> > past a certain point, constant whining
>
> Congratulations, you just joined the 10% of the net (
Rob VanFleet wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37PM -0400, J.F.Gratton wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 22:07, ben wrote:
be fair. if it wasn't for rms, there might very well not be a linux,
much less a debian.
A zealot is a zealot is a zealot. He might have been usefull, but past a
certain poin
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:19:37PM -0400, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 22:07, ben wrote:
>
> > be fair. if it wasn't for rms, there might very well not be a linux,
> > much less a debian.
>
> A zealot is a zealot is a zealot. He might have been usefull, but past a
> certain point,
16 matches
Mail list logo
