Re: OT: Spam was Re: Spamassassin Configuration

2003-10-25 Thread Will Trillich
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:07:05PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote: > Or I could take the plunge and switch to an address on my own > domain, on my own mailserver. (The current one is hosted by my > ISP.) But if I do that, I'll be all tempted to upgrade to > exim4 with the funky integration with SA to do SM

Re: OT: Spam was Re: Spamassassin Configuration

2003-09-30 Thread ScruLoose
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:06:47AM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote: > ScruLoose wrote: > > >As others have noted, virus traffic is not actually the same as > >spam-traffic, and you might want a particular tool for each job... > Back on topic, I agree that it is important to realize that different >

OT: Spam was Re: Spamassassin Configuration

2003-09-28 Thread Jacob Anawalt
ScruLoose wrote: As others have noted, virus traffic is not actually the same as spam-traffic, and you might want a particular tool for each job... To me they are both Spam. I did not ask to recieve either, and they are both attempting to fill the mailboxes of several users on the same syste