On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:08:40PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
Windows 5 (XP, 2000) is based on the now 32-bit kernel (morphed
from a mix of Windows 3, OS/2 and Vax code.)
The so-called NT kernel? *Vax* code? Does that mean the jokes
concerning Windows NT - WNT - one shift along from VMS have
Thus spake Pigeon:
The so-called NT kernel? *Vax* code? Does that mean the jokes
concerning Windows NT - WNT - one shift along from VMS have
some substance? I thought they were based on the cyberspace version of
a urban legend. (Would that be cyberpolitan legend?)
See
It is a fact that MS hired the VMS architect to design Windows NT.
However, IMHO, it doesn't show. There are so many things that VMS did
right that either don't appear at all in WinNT, or are done wrong.
Just my $0.02USD,
Jeffrey
Quoting Pigeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 15:36, Pigeon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:08:40PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
Windows 5 (XP, 2000) is based on the now 32-bit kernel (morphed
from a mix of Windows 3, OS/2 and Vax code.)
The so-called NT kernel? *Vax* code? Does that mean the jokes
concerning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:31:06PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt waxed eloquent and said:
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 15:36, Pigeon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:08:40PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
Windows 5 (XP, 2000) is based on the now 32-bit kernel
5 matches
Mail list logo
