On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:50:17AM -0800, Paul Johnson said
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:37:19PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
Of course, just saying RTFM and SFTW when there's no FM or W hits to
read is not OK, either.
At least not without qualifying it with where one can find it on TFW
or in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:39:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a shame that at times debian-user can be so
inhospitable to debain users. I think it is unfair to have a
question answered with try google or some other variation
of RTFM.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:37:19PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
Of course, just saying RTFM and SFTW when there's no FM or W hits to
read is not OK, either.
At least not without qualifying it with where one can find it on TFW
or in TFM.
- --
.''`.
It is a shame that at times debian-user can be so
inhospitable to debain users. I think it is unfair to have a
question answered with try google or some other variation
of RTFM. Am I to understand that instead of using the
debian-user list that I should use a search engine? I was
under the
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:39:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is a shame that at times debian-user can be so inhospitable to
debain users. I think it is unfair to have a question answered with
try google or some other variation of RTFM.
If the answer is in a readily available manual
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:39:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of RTFM. Am I to understand that instead of using the
debian-user list that I should use a search engine?
It's unclear from your rant what you are actually upset about.
The answer to this question is no -- but google indexes
On 2004-02-25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned:
It is a shame that at times debian-user can be so inhospitable to
debain users. I think it is unfair to have a question answered with
try google or some other variation of RTFM. Am I to understand that
instead of using the debian-user list that I
On 2004-02-25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned:
However I will in the future assume that any problem I have is the
same in all distros and I will do searches on the web first. I concede
to RT proverbial FM even if that M is spread across all of the known
Internet. Who knows? maybe I will never
Hello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It is a shame that at times debian-user can be so inhospitable
to debain users.
It is not debian-user that is inhospitable, it are the other readers (or
some of them). In many cases this has a reason, one being that they
don't want to read
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:39:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
It is a shame that at times debian-user can be so inhospitable to
debain users. I think it is unfair to have a question answered with
try google or some other variation of RTFM. Am I to understand that
instead of using the
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 14:39 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I will in the future assume that any problem I have
is the same in all distros and I will do searches on the web
first.
An invaluable resource on the art of asking questions, despite the
overblown hacker talk, is ESR's How To
11 matches
Mail list logo
