on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:22:14PM +0200, martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is anyone using the rfc-ignorant RBL? I have seen Karsten and Baloo
> report there, but testing it out right now, I immediately discovered
> that
>
> - amazon.com does not accept postmaster@
> - aol.com does
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030924 17:23]:
> Is anyone using the rfc-ignorant RBL? I have seen Karsten and Baloo
> report there, but testing it out right now, I immediately discovered
> that
>
> - amazon.com does not accept postmaster@
> - aol.com does not accept abuse@
>
> Thus I
Is anyone using the rfc-ignorant RBL? I have seen Karsten and Baloo
report there, but testing it out right now, I immediately discovered
that
- amazon.com does not accept postmaster@
- aol.com does not accept abuse@
Thus I am wondering: is this at all useful? dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
seems to be,
3 matches
Mail list logo