Re: Obscure Perl modules

2003-07-23 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Leif B. Kristensen wrote: Hi, I'm still fairly new to Debian and am trying to find my way around the system. I've got some gripes about the naming practice and poor documentation of Perl modules. As an example, I started out today to find a package which I have used a lot on my W2K system, named

Re: Obscure Perl modules

2003-07-22 Thread Richard Downer
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:11:11 +0200, Leif B. Kristensen wrote: However, I wonder if there is any correspondence between a package name such as it appears on say, CPAN, and the Debian package names? Most Perl packages in Debian are named based upon the CPAN package name. Some examples: DBD::Pg -

Re: Obscure Perl modules

2003-07-22 Thread Paul Talacko
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:43:12AM +0100, Richard Downer wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:11:11 +0200, Leif B. Kristensen wrote: However, I wonder if there is any correspondence between a package name such as it appears on say, CPAN, and the Debian package names? Most Perl packages in Debian

Obscure Perl modules

2003-07-21 Thread Leif B. Kristensen
Hi, I'm still fairly new to Debian and am trying to find my way around the system. I've got some gripes about the naming practice and poor documentation of Perl modules. As an example, I started out today to find a package which I have used a lot on my W2K system, named DBD::XBase. It's an

Re: Obscure Perl modules

2003-07-21 Thread Nathan Poznick
Thus spake Leif B. Kristensen: However, I wonder if there is any correspondence between a package name such as it appears on say, CPAN, and the Debian package names? Shouldn't the original module name be referred to on the package page?

Re: Obscure Perl modules

2003-07-21 Thread Leif B. Kristensen
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:29:24 -0500, Nathan Poznick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus spake Leif B. Kristensen: However, I wonder if there is any correspondence between a package name such as it appears on say, CPAN, and the Debian package names? Shouldn't the original module name be referred to on

Re: Obscure Perl modules

2003-07-21 Thread Nathan Poznick
Thus spake Leif B. Kristensen: Ahem. So, in order to find one package of interest, I should install a random number of packages and read the documentation afterwards? Or, maybe I could run an apt-get install * and be finished with it once and for all? Thank you for a really imaginative

Re: Obscure Perl modules

2003-07-21 Thread Leif B. Kristensen
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:33:30 -0500, Nathan Poznick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You asked what you should do to read the documentation from a package. If you want to read a package's documentation, you should install or at least download the package. Not rocket science there. If your intent is to