Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga.

2019-07-25 Thread David Wright
On Tue 23 Jul 2019 at 15:31:12 (-0400), Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:19:27PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > I don't see any NUL characters, but x80 as shown below. I'm reading > > the cached message that mutt downloaded from an IMAP server. Is that > > different from you? > >

Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga.

2019-07-23 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:35:59PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:31:12PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:19:27PM -0500, David Wright wrote: >I don't see any NUL characters, but x80 as shown below. I'm reading >the cached message that mutt

Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga.

2019-07-23 Thread tomas
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:38:33PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:19:27PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > On Tue 23 Jul 2019 at 11:07:37 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > Yup. Two NUL bytes in the body of the message. How completely bizarre. > > > > > > Apparently

Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga.

2019-07-23 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:19:27PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 23 Jul 2019 at 11:07:37 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Yup. Two NUL bytes in the body of the message. How completely bizarre. > > > > Apparently what mutt does is truncate that *line* at the first NUL > > byte, but then

Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga.

2019-07-23 Thread tomas
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:31:12PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:19:27PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > >I don't see any NUL characters, but x80 as shown below. I'm reading > >the cached message that mutt downloaded from an IMAP server. Is that > >different from you? > >

Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga.

2019-07-23 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:19:27PM -0500, David Wright wrote: I don't see any NUL characters, but x80 as shown below. I'm reading the cached message that mutt downloaded from an IMAP server. Is that different from you? I see it as x80 in mutt and x00 in the raw file on the imap server. I

Re: Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga.

2019-07-23 Thread tomas
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:19:27PM -0500, David Wright wrote: [...] > I don't see any NUL characters, but x80 as shown below [...] Oh, that's cute :-) If I followed along correctly, the questionable mails have neither Content-Type nor Content-Transfer-Encoding. So the content type defaults to

Odd character, was Re: buster, ekiga.

2019-07-23 Thread David Wright
On Tue 23 Jul 2019 at 11:07:37 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:41:20AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > * From: Brad Rogers > > Oh, it's this guy again. > > /me looks at the raw mail message with less(1) > > * From: Brad Rogers ^@b...@fineby.me.uk^@ > >