On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:11:26PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Note this bit from the "apt-get --compile source ${pnam}${pver}"
> command:
>Need to get 647kB of source archives.
>Get:1 http://mirrors.kernel.org sarge/main gqview 1.0.2-1 (dsc)
>
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 16:26, Pigeon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > Here's how I do it:
> > # apt-get source gqview=1.0.2-1
> > # export CC=gcc-3.2 -Wall -O2 -mcpu=pentiumpro
> > # apt-get --compile source gqview=1.0.2-1
> > # dpkg -i gqview.deb
> >
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 07:42, Andreas J Guelzow wrote:
> Pigeon wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
> apt-get --compile source
>
> is supposed to download the source and
>
> apt-get --compile source
>
> is supposed to download it and compile it.
You
Pigeon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>>Here's how I do it:
>># apt-get source gqview=1.0.2-1
>># export CC=gcc-3.2 -Wall -O2 -mcpu=pentiumpro
>># apt-get --compile source gqview=1.0.2-1
>># dpkg -i gqview.deb
>> alternatively:
>># apt-get --compile source
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Here's how I do it:
> # apt-get source gqview=1.0.2-1
> # export CC=gcc-3.2 -Wall -O2 -mcpu=pentiumpro
> # apt-get --compile source gqview=1.0.2-1
> # dpkg -i gqview.deb
> alternatively:
> # apt-get --compile source gqview=1.0.2-1
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 12:14, Pigeon wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 04:43:44PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > Having put appropriate deb-src
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 04:43:44PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD
> > > images or websi
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 23:43, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD
> > > images or websites as approp
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD
> > images or websites as appropriate, have I got this sequence right?
> >
> > apt-get sourc
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD
> > images or websites as appropriate, have I got this sequence right?
> >
> > apt-get sourc
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
[snip]
>
> Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD
> images or websites as appropriate, have I got this sequence right?
>
> apt-get source --download-only whatever # get source package
> dpkg-source -x whatever.dsc
Hi,
Having installed woody I'm now wanting to compile stuff that is used a
lot and/or is CPU-intensive (C libraries, shell, gcc, gzip...)
optimised for my CPU. I've done the kernel and X already; gcc has gone
from egcs-2.91.66 to gcc-2.95.4; definitely looks slower than with
slink.
With all my wo
12 matches
Mail list logo