On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:55:55AM -0500, Steve Block wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:20:40AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >Short summary of popular IMAP servers:
> >server why you would use it
> >--
> >UW IMAP You are a masochist
> >Cyru
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:20:40AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Short summary of popular IMAP servers:
server why you would use it
--
UW IMAP You are a masochist
Cyrus IMAP You need *serious* scalability (e.g., 100,000 users with
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:23:43AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Jun 05 2005, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > I'd say go with UW's IMAP server.
>
> I'd say go with UW's IMAP server *only* if your computer isn't facing the
> Internet -- it has a bad security track history and many people don't trust
> it.
On Jun 05 2005, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I'd say go with UW's IMAP server.
I'd say go with UW's IMAP server *only* if your computer isn't facing the
Internet -- it has a bad security track history and many people don't trust
it.
> as far as I can tell there is none. Either it works or it doesn't. :D
4 matches
Mail list logo
