Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com writes:
The particular part I was pedantically talking about was your comment
that said checks that it is executable, yes, all good, and then you
go on to say *and* sees to it that this user has permission. It was
that last part, the second part of the _and_ that I
Harry Putnam wrote:
Bob Proulx writes:
commenting upon. Because while true for non-root for root if it is
root there isn't any user test. For the root user it is purely a
Alright... at last. I've been laying for a chance to pedantic right
back at you...
:-)
check to see if there is
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm still not getting the whole picture of what is supposed to happen
on a machine with both anacron and cron installed.
And you might be tired of having me respond about it. :-)
Not on your life! I have a certain fondness for
Harry Putnam wrote:
Bob Proulx writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm still not getting the whole picture of what is supposed to happen
on a machine with both anacron and cron installed.
And you might be tired of having me respond about it. :-)
Not on your life! I have a certain fondness
I'm still not getting the whole picture of what is supposed to happen
on a machine with both anacron and cron installed.
I understand the reasoning for machines that are not up all the time,
where anacron picks up the slack for cron jobs that came up with
the machine down.
I get that.
But in my
Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm still not getting the whole picture of what is supposed to happen
on a machine with both anacron and cron installed.
And you might be tired of having me respond about it. :-)
I have lines like the one below in /etc/crontab
[...] test -x /usr/sbin/anacron || ( cd /
6 matches
Mail list logo
