On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:13:57AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:18:52 +0100,
> Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 06:22:09AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > >
> > > ..I would think British Rail has _several_ use
On (12/09/03 00:23), Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>
> > > .agreed, but I do not wanna use this list to discuss the
> > > details of the tender docs. ;-)
> > >
> > Agreed again but as yet there seem to only six people interested on list
> > and two off. Is this enough? Or more importantly do we have
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:18:52 +0100,
Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 06:22:09AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >
> > ..I would think British Rail has _several_ uses for computers,
> > and not just the un-written RailGear.org train simulat
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:48:19 +0100,
Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On (11/09/03 17:58), Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:18:51 +0100,
> > Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On (11/09/03
--- Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > .agreed, but I do not wanna use this list to discuss the
> > details of the tender docs. ;-)
> >
> Agreed again but as yet there seem to only six people interested on list
> and two off. Is this enough? Or more importantly do we have suffic
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 06:22:09AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> ..I would think British Rail has _several_ uses for computers,
> and not just the un-written RailGear.org train simulator,
It hasn't been British Rail since the early 90s when it was
privatised. We now have separate sets of organi
On (11/09/03 17:58), Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:18:51 +0100,
> Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On (11/09/03 08:09), Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 00:36, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > > [ re Network Rail tender reque
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:18:51 +0100,
Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On (11/09/03 08:09), Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 00:36, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > [ re Network Rail tender request ]
> > > I'm London (UK) based and have a business ba
On Thursday 11 September 2003 15:09, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> I'm an accountant by training, but technical by long-settled choice.
>
> Making a tender is very much a business and marketing exercise. We
> would need to convince the customer not only of the technical merits of
> our proposal but also
On (11/09/03 08:09), Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 00:36, Clive Menzies wrote:
> [ re Network Rail tender request ]
> > I'm London (UK) based and have a business background. I lack the
> > technical skills and knowledge to approach this but I'd be happy to
> > contribute.
>
> I'm
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 00:36, Clive Menzies wrote:
[ re Network Rail tender request ]
> I'm London (UK) based and have a business background. I lack the
> technical skills and knowledge to approach this but I'd be happy to
> contribute.
I'm an accountant by training, but technical by long-settled
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:17:58 +0800,
David Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 11 September 2003 07:36, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > On (10/09/03 15:29), Pigeon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:21:56PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 9 Sep
On Thursday 11 September 2003 07:36, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (10/09/03 15:29), Pigeon wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:21:56PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:21:23 +0100,
> > > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:
--- Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On (10/09/03 15:29), Pigeon wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:21:56PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:21:23 +0100,
> > > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:57:05AM +010
On (10/09/03 15:29), Pigeon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:21:56PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:21:23 +0100,
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:57:05AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > > on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:21:56PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:21:23 +0100,
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:57:05AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:09:43AM +0100, Pig
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:21:23 +0100,
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:57:05AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:09:43AM +0100, Pigeon
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:> From the current issue of RAIL
> > mag
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:57:05AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:09:43AM +0100, Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > From the current issue of RAIL magazine:
> >
> > "Network Rail is seeking tenders to replace its Windows NT system,
> > which Microsoft abandons in Dec
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:10:12PM +0200, Geoff Thurman wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2003 5:09 am, Pigeon wrote:
> > From the current issue of RAIL magazine:
> >
> > "Network Rail is seeking tenders to replace its Windows NT system,
> > which Microsoft abandons in December. NR has 10,000 deskto
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 11:21 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:57:05AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:09:43AM +0100, Pigeon
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > From the current issue of RAIL magazine:
> > >
> > > "Network Rail is seeking tenders
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 5:09 am, Pigeon wrote:
> From the current issue of RAIL magazine:
>
> "Network Rail is seeking tenders to replace its Windows NT system,
> which Microsoft abandons in December. NR has 10,000 desktop
> computers, 2,900 laptops and 300 servers - the equivalent of one
> co
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:57:05AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:09:43AM +0100, Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > From the current issue of RAIL magazine:
> >
> > "Network Rail is seeking tenders to replace its Windows NT system,
> > which Microsoft abandons in Dec
on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:09:43AM +0100, Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From the current issue of RAIL magazine:
>
> "Network Rail is seeking tenders to replace its Windows NT system,
> which Microsoft abandons in December. NR has 10,000 desktop computers,
> 2,900 laptops and 300 servers - t
From the current issue of RAIL magazine:
"Network Rail is seeking tenders to replace its Windows NT system,
which Microsoft abandons in December. NR has 10,000 desktop computers,
2,900 laptops and 300 servers - the equivalent of one computer for
each track mile it owns!"
--
Pigeon
Be kind to pi
24 matches
Mail list logo