http://www.hobby.nl/~clifton/bogomips-2.html#ss2.5
Explains what's going on...
Oki DZ wrote:
> Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
>
> > I still find it interesting, that his bogomips count has increased by
> > factor 2.
>
> Yes, me too. And in fact, I was pretty happy (at least for a while)...
> wow, I u
Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
I still find it interesting, that his bogomips count has increased by
factor 2.
Yes, me too. And in fact, I was pretty happy (at least for a while)...
wow, I upgraded the kernel, and now my machine has doubled its power
My bogomips count has always been the sa
Quoting Viktor Rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I still find it interesting, that his bogomips count has increased by
> factor 2. My bogomips count has always been the same on the same
> machine, regardless of whether I used a 2.0, 2.2, or now 2.4 series
> kernel. It has never changed it's value
I still find it interesting, that his bogomips count has increased by
factor 2. My bogomips count has always been the same on the same
machine, regardless of whether I used a 2.0, 2.2, or now 2.4 series
kernel. It has never changed it's value (apart from one or two 1/100)
on both an AMD and an In
Bogomips really isnt a measure of anything performance wise, its just there to
calibrate a delay loop. I'm not sure about 2.4, but in 2.2 bogomips was
generally equal the mhz for intel chips, and *2 for amd chips.
Your inablity to run more than java 1.3 is most likely not related at all the
y
Hi,
I have the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a; /bin/more /proc/cpuinfo
Linux bdg 2.4.0 #2 Tue Jan 30 14:54:09 JAVT 2001 i686 unknown
processor: 0
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 7
model name: Pentium III (Katmai)
stepping: 3
cpu MHz: 551
6 matches
Mail list logo
