Hi,
>>"Amos" == Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amos> I'm still looking for this kernel-image package. Can't find it
Amos> in the ls-lR files.
It should appear in the mirrors soon, it was moved out of
incoming recently.
Amos> Now what about support for multiple kernels? Is it p
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Hi,
> >>"Brian" == Brian C White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> >> There is indeed a Debian-ized version of the kernel. The package
> >> is >> called kernel-image.
I'm still looking for this kernel-image package. Can't find it in the ls-lR
files.
>
> >> You cou
On Fri, 31 May 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava writes [ SuperCite undone - iwj ]:
> > Brian C White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > So... Should there be a restriction against listing the
> > > kernel-image as a dependancy in another package?
> >
> > No, since if you follow the
Manoj Srivastava writes [ SuperCite undone - iwj ]:
> Brian C White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So... Should there be a restriction against listing the
> > kernel-image as a dependancy in another package?
>
> No, since if you follow the recommended method of generating
> kernel images,
Hi,
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> On the contrary, we should not require people to follow this
Ian> method, especially when it's easy not to make this requirement.
Ian> Packages which need a particular kernel or kernel feature to run
Ian> correctly should test for the ke
Hi,
>>"Brian" == Brian C White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> There is indeed a Debian-ized version of the kernel. The package
>> is >> called kernel-image.
>> You could also grab the raw source and use kernel-package package
>> to generate your new image package. This is the recommended meth
Hi,
>>"Brian" == Brian C White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Is there a Debian-ized package of this kernel or are Debian
>> testers > expected to grab the "raw" source?
>> There is indeed a Debian-ized version of the kernel. The package is
>> called kernel-image.
You could als
> "Brian" == Brian C White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> But is there a "self-compiled-kernel-image"? At least the new
Brian> "diald" (in Incoming) depends on "kernel-image".
Brian> So... Should there be a restriction against listing the
Brian> kernel-image as a dependancy in another
> > Is there a Debian-ized package of this kernel or are Debian testers
> > expected to grab the "raw" source?
>
> There is indeed a Debian-ized version of the kernel. The package is called
> kernel-image.
But is there a "self-compiled-kernel-image"? At least the new "diald" (in
Incoming) depend
On Wed, 29 May 1996, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Bruce Perens wrote:
> > Linus released pre2.0.7 and then went to the Linux Kongress in Germany
> > for a week. Please test this on pre2.0.7 if you can, and report it if
> > it is still broken. He urged us to put a lot of testing into pre2.0.7 .
>
> Is th
Bruce Perens wrote:
> Linus released pre2.0.7 and then went to the Linux Kongress in Germany
> for a week. Please test this on pre2.0.7 if you can, and report it if
> it is still broken. He urged us to put a lot of testing into pre2.0.7 .
Is there a Debian-ized package of this kernel or are Debian
On Tue, 28 May 1996, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> Never compile PPP into the kernel. Always compile it as a module and load
> it via /etc/modules. This is because slhc.c says it needs to be compiled
> as a module and ppp relies on it.
I have ppp compiled into my kernel (not as a module) and it's wor
On Mon, 27 May 1996, Michael Callahan wrote:
> I just grabbed the latest disks from ftp.debian.org (in
> /pub/debian/unstable/disks-i386/current, the 1440 series), and
> proceded to do the installation. It mostly works, but I'm
> having trouble with PPP. I recompiled the kernel (using 1.3.100-1
Michael Callahan said:
> I just grabbed the latest disks from ftp.debian.org (in
> /pub/debian/unstable/disks-i386/current, the 1440 series), and
> proceded to do the installation. It mostly works, but I'm
> having trouble with PPP. I recompiled the kernel (using 1.3.100-1 now)
> with PPP support
>Michael Callahan said:
>> I just grabbed the latest disks from ftp.debian.org (in
>> /pub/debian/unstable/disks-i386/current, the 1440 series), and
>> proceded to do the installation. It mostly works, but I'm
>> having trouble with PPP. I recompiled the kernel (using 1.3.100-1 now)
>> wit
> For now, I run 'pppd' without the 'connect' option once after a reboot. It
> will fail, of course, but it puts the ttyS* device into the correct state,
> and
> 'pppd' works fine after that.
> I gave it a try, and yes, this works.
Linus released pre2.0.7 and then went to the Linux Kongress in Ge
I just grabbed the latest disks from ftp.debian.org (in
/pub/debian/unstable/disks-i386/current, the 1440 series), and
proceded to do the installation. It mostly works, but I'm
having trouble with PPP. I recompiled the kernel (using 1.3.100-1 now)
with PPP support, but when I try to run pppd, it
17 matches
Mail list logo
