Re: Parallel GZIP --> speed instead of 2 CPUs running

On 12/23/08 00:28, Osamu Aoki wrote: [snip] PS: I did not understand intent of "Total" time written in Ron Johnson's post. I added up real+user+sys, but suddenly I realize what a stupid mistake that was. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA I like my women like I like my coffee - purchas

Re: Parallel GZIP --> speed instead of 2 CPUs running

Hi, I am wonderig why Ron Johnson replied to my post with just bzip2 bench marks. Maybe I was unclear about myself. >> Osamu: >> The full story is here on my amd64 core2duo system: >> >> Summary: (with -1 option for speed, real time for compression) >> >> Binary filesText f

Re: Parallel GZIP --> speed instead of 2 CPUs running

On 12/22/08 10:49, Osamu Aoki wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:13:17PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Thomas Preud'homme wrote: The Monday 22 December 2008 13:53:43 Eugene V. Lyubimkin, you wrote : ... I have a core 2 duo and time give me a usage of almost 200% with pbzip2 Anyone has bet

Re: Parallel GZIP --> speed instead of 2 CPUs running

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:13:17PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > The Monday 22 December 2008 13:53:43 Eugene V. Lyubimkin, you wrote : ... > > I have a core 2 duo and time give me a usage of almost 200% with pbzip2 > > > > Anyone has better results ? > Yes, see