Quoting Christoph Simon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:16:19 -
Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In older days a /usr/local was recommended because this is where you would
install all the alien software on your system. By alien I mean, Things
that did not come prepared for
-
From: Lazar Fleysher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 1:11 PM
Subject: Partitioning disk
Hi Everybody,
This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:16:19 -
Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In older days a /usr/local was recommended because this is where you would
install all the alien software on your system. By alien I mean, Things
that did not come prepared for your system, or things you compiled yourself.
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 08:17:23AM -0200, Christoph Simon wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice to give it more use even today. Maybe someone can
find a way to have the stable distribution in the main tree and the unstable
in local. There seem to be many people using stable, but wishing to
get also
on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:38:25PM -0500, S . Salman Ahmed ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
EB == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EB On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 08:17:23AM -0200, Christoph Simon
EB wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice to give it more use even today. Maybe
someone can
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:38:25PM -0500, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
Is there a HOWTO (or sth similar to one) explaining how to setup sth
like this ? I am not at all familiar with chroot (or chroot jails), but
the idea of having stable and unstable on the same machine is very
interesting.
Any
Hi Everybody,
This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions of
/usr
/usr/local/
In early days when disks were small, this was the only choise, but now,
why do not just have a 1 - 2G partition for the
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Lazar Fleysher wrote:
Hi Everybody,
This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions of
/usr
/usr/local/
In early days when disks were small, this was
also, /var can have a tendency to fill up rapidly, and if it's on the same
partition as / there can be some pretty significant problems cropping up.
rick
Ethan Benson writes:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Lazar Fleysher wrote:
Hi Everybody,
This question has been a
on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Lazar Fleysher ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Hi Everybody,
This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions of
/usr
/usr/local/
In early days when disks
Lazar Fleysher schrieb:
Hi Everybody,
This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions of
/usr
/usr/local/
In early days when disks were small, this was the only choise, but now,
why do not just
11 matches
Mail list logo
