Re: Performance of mu in buster

juh writes: > Hi all, > > I am very disappointed of mu in buster. In stretch I index nearly > 300.000 emails with mu. Each time I index new mails in mu4e I had to > wait 15 minutes until the indexing was complete. So I hoped that > indexing with mu 1.2 would be much faster, but instead mu eats a

Re: Performance of mu in buster

juh [2019-07-20T19:44:47+02] wrote: > I am very disappointed of mu in buster. In stretch I index nearly > 300.000 emails with mu. Each time I index new mails in mu4e I had to > wait 15 minutes until the indexing was complete. So I hoped that > indexing with mu 1.2 would be much faster, but instead

Performance of mu in buster

Hi all, I am very disappointed of mu in buster. In stretch I index nearly 300.000 emails with mu. Each time I index new mails in mu4e I had to wait 15 minutes until the indexing was complete. So I hoped that indexing with mu 1.2 would be much faster, but instead mu eats all my memory and indexes s