On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> > why not just use the arguments passed to /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down} by pppd?
>
> Sure, I could do that, but suppose pppd changes the order in which it
> passes parameters with the next pppd upgrade... I'll still be running,
> if I used $4, and didn't k
Jason Costomiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sure, I could do that, but suppose pppd changes the order in which it
> passes parameters with the next pppd upgrade... I'll still be running, if
> I used $4, and didn't know about the change, I'd be dead.
If pppd changes the order of its parameters
On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:
> why not just use the arguments passed to /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down} by pppd?
Sure, I could do that, but suppose pppd changes the order in which it
passes parameters with the next pppd upgrade... I'll still be running, if
I used $4, and didn't know about the
> I use that fun awk stuff since my dialup is a dynamically assigned IP
> address.
>
why not just use the arguments passed to /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down} by pppd?
They are documented in the comments at the beginning of the scripts
included with the ppp .deb package:
# $Id: ip-up,v 1.1 1996/01/31 21:
On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:
> That just about somes it up
>
> If the router sends, receives or carries a ping flood (ping -f or ping -l
> 65510) pppd dies. I'm unable to hang-up the modem from anything I do in
> telnet. (serial ports have no DTR line) After I flash the power on t
That just about somes it up
If the router sends, receives or carries a ping flood (ping -f or ping -l
65510) pppd dies. I'm unable to hang-up the modem from anything I do in
telnet. (serial ports have no DTR line) After I flash the power on the modem
I can telnet in and "/etc/init.d/ppp start
6 matches
Mail list logo
