On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:17:50PM +, Steve Kleene wrote:
On 2011-01-12 23:13:13 GMT, Simon Hollenbach
ionpowered at googlemail.com wrote:
Debian Mailing lists are not there to test if you can post to them, that's
highly unwanted, as stated on debian.org .
You have my apologies.
On 2011-01-12 23:13:13 GMT, Simon Hollenbach
ionpowered at googlemail.com wrote:
Debian Mailing lists are not there to test if you can post to them, that's
highly unwanted, as stated on debian.org .
You have my apologies. Posts from my organization are being bounced recently
by debian-user.
Please ignore this test.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/e13205c9cb112a44b029c1c3f20eb8ff5dcc7fe...@ucmailbe5.ad.uc.edu
Dne, 12. 01. 2011 14:07:53 je Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a):
Please ignore this test.
Ignoring.
Please ignore this reply.
--
Cheerio,
Klistvud
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com
Certifiable Loonix User #481801 Please reply to the list, not to
me
Le 14986ième jour après Epoch,
Klistvud écrivait:
Dne, 12. 01. 2011 14:07:53 je Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a):
Please ignore this test.
Ignoring.
Please ignore this reply.
Should we ignore you've replied, or should we ignore that you've ignored
the first msg?
It's confusing
Dne, 12. 01. 2011 17:23:27 je François TOURDE napisal(a):
Le 14986ième jour après Epoch,
Klistvud écrivait:
Dne, 12. 01. 2011 14:07:53 je Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a):
Please ignore this test.
Ignoring.
Please ignore this reply.
Should we ignore you've replied, or should we ignore
* On 2011 12 Jan 10:34 -0600, Klistvud wrote:
Dne, 12. 01. 2011 17:23:27 je François TOURDE napisal(a):
Le 14986ième jour après Epoch,
Klistvud écrivait:
Dne, 12. 01. 2011 14:07:53 je Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a):
Please ignore this test.
Ignoring.
Please ignore this reply
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:34:23 +0100
Klistvud quotati...@aliceadsl.fr wrote:
Dne, 12. 01. 2011 17:23:27 je François TOURDE napisal(a):
Le 14986ième jour après Epoch,
Klistvud écrivait:
Dne, 12. 01. 2011 14:07:53 je Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a):
Please ignore this test
Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a):
Please ignore this test.
Ignoring.
Please ignore this reply.
Should we ignore you've replied, or should we ignore that you've
ignored
the first msg?
It's confusing ;) ... Oh, ignore it :P
Well, replying to your
If a thread is posted to a listserv, and everyone ignores it, does
Godwin's law apply?
Since it is a law we could reason that it always applies. Therefore If a
thread is ignored from the beginning then that would mean that it was a
Nazi reference on it's own and therefore it's been
14:07:53 je Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a):
Please ignore this test.
Ignoring.
Please ignore this reply.
Should we ignore you've replied, or should we ignore that you've
ignored
the first msg?
It's confusing ;) ... Oh, ignore it :P
Well, replying to your question wouldn't be ignoring
- Original message -
If a thread is posted to a listserv, and everyone ignores it, does
Godwin's law apply?
only to 'ignore' rant Nazis.
For sure Quirks Exception applies now, its not in the English wikipedia(its in
the German), here's another link:
12 matches
Mail list logo